Validation of the Greek version of Euthanasia Attitude Scale in the general population: A Quantitative Study
Published:
Jul 7, 2025
Keywords:
Euthanasia Greek validation study euthanasia attitude scale
Abstract
In examining the broader ethical implications of euthanasia, which is defined as the ace of ending one’s life with the intention of alleviating suffering, it is essential to consider ethical principles such as autonomy and the right to die. Euthanasia is a complex and ethically sensitive issue that continues to spark heated debate globally. Understanding public opinions toward euthanasia is critical for informing policy and healthcare decision-making. This study attempted to validate the Euthanasia Attitude Scale in the Greek general population since this issue affects both healthcare workers and the public. A cross-sectional study design was adopted with a sample of 120 Greek adults who completed a questionnaire which included demographic data and the Euthanasia Attitude Scale. The Cronbach's alpha was determined at a=0.950 for all questions, indicating that the questionnaire has a high internal consistency. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy indicated that factor analysis was appropriate for the data (KMO = 0.913), while Bartlett’s test of sphericity was statistically significant (p < 0.001), confirming the suitability of the correlation matrix for factor extraction. The components had statistically significant positive relationships with the overall Euthanasia Attitude Scale (p<0.001). The assessment of the validity and reliability of the Euthanasia Attitude Scale demonstrated that it is a psychometrically sound instrument for evaluating the general population’s attitudes and perceptions toward euthanasia, and can be effectively used to measure individuals’ proclivity toward its acceptance. The scale may serve as a valuable tool for informing public health policies by offering insight into societal attitudes, thereby guiding ethical decision-making related to euthanasia legislation and healthcare practice.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Provias, G., Argyrou, O., & Theofanidis, D. (2025). Validation of the Greek version of Euthanasia Attitude Scale in the general population: A Quantitative Study. Health & Research Journal, 11(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.12681/healthresj.40498
- Section
- Special Articles
Copyright notice:
The journal "Health and Research Journal" reserves the rights for copyright of the content of the website and also the copyright of the articles published.
By virtue of their appearance in this journal, the articles are free to be used for non-commercial purposes. However, the articles cannot and must not be used in anyway, published elsewhere or modified without any reference to the author and the first publication of the article.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Malliarou M, Tzenetidis V, Papathanasiou I, Vourdami K, Tzenetidis N, Nikolentzos A, et al. Physicians’ attitudes towards euthanasia and correlation with their spirituality. Psychiatriki [Internet]. 2022;33(4):323–7. Available from: https://psychiatriki-jour-nal.gr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1789&lang=en
Parpa E, Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Sakkas P, Patiraki E, Piste-vou-Gombaki K, et al. The attitudes of Greek physicians and lay people on euthanasia and physician-assisted sui-cide in terminally ill cancer patients. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 2006;23(4):297–303.
Hatzis A. Deliberate euthanasia, personal autonomy and human dignity. Bioethica [Internet]. 2016 Nov 22;2(2):2. Available from: https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/bioethica/article/view/19777
Herath HMMTB, Wijayawardhana KWSM, Wickramarachchi UI, Rodrigo C. Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study. BMC Med Ethics [Internet]. 2021 Dec 7 [cited 2024 Jan 18];22(1):162. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00731-2
Vajawat B, Hegde PR, Malathesh BC, Kumar CN, Sivakumar PT, Math SB. Palliative Care and Legal Issues in Geriatric Psychiatry. Indian J Psychol Med [Internet]. 2021 Sep 19;43(5_suppl):S31–6. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02537176211031077
Fontalis A, Prousali E, Kulkarni K. Euthanasia and assisted dying: what is the current position and what are the key arguments informing the debate? J R Soc Med. 2018 Nov;111(11):407–13.
Varelius J. Active and passive physician-assisted dying and the terminal disease requirement. Bioethics. 2016;30(9):663–71.
Protopapadakis E. Passive euthanasia and the right to die. Bioethica. 2018;4(2):9–16.
Brassington I. What passive euthanasia is. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):1–13.
Theofanidis D, Mecek F. Euthanasia: A Healthcare debate from a Greek-Turkish perspective. Int J Caring Sci [Inter-net]. 2016;9(1):321–9. Available from: https://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/31_Thofanidis_original_9_1.pdf
Kono M, Arai N, Takimoto Y. Identifying practical clinical problems in active euthanasia: A systematic literature re-view of the findings in countries where euthanasia is le-gal. Palliat Support Care [Internet]. 2023 Aug 9;21(4):705–13. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1478951522001699/type/journal_article
Mroz S, Dierickx S, Deliens L, Cohen J, Chambaere K. As-sisted dying around the world: a status quaestionis. An-nals of Palliative Medicine; Vol 10, No 3 (March 31, 2021): Annals of Palliative Medicine [Internet]. 2020; Available from: https://apm.amegroups.org/article/view/50986
Rada AG. Spain will become the sixth country worldwide to allow euthanasia and assisted suicide. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 Jan 15;372:n147. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n147
Bitar HN. Greek Orthodox. In: Banerjee C, editor. Under-standing End of Life Practices: Perspectives on Communi-cation, Religion and Culture [Internet]. Cham: Springer In-ternational Publishing; 2023. p. 219–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29923-0_15
Mystakidou K, Parpa E, Tsilika E, Katsouda E, Vlahos L. The Evolution of Euthanasia and Its Perceptions in Greek Cul-ture and Civilization. Perspect Biol Med [Internet]. 2005 Dec;48(1):95–104. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/177283
Kranidiotis G, Ropa J, Mprianas J, Kyprianou T, Nanas S. Attitudes towards euthanasia among Greek intensive care unit physicians and nurses. Heart & Lung [Internet]. 2015 May 1 [cited 2024 Jan 18];44(3):260–3. Available from: http://www.heartandlung.org/article/S014795631500062X/fulltext
Patelarou E, Vardavas CI, Fioraki I, Alegakis T, Dafermou M, Ntzilepi P. Euthanasia in Greece: Greek nurses’ in-volvement and beliefs. Int J Palliat Nurs [Internet]. 2009 May;15(5):242–8. Available from: http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/ijpn.2009.15.5.42350
Stergiannis P, Fanouraki-Stavrakaki E, Manthou P, Intas G. Investigation on the Attitudes and Perspectives of Medi-cal and Nursing Staff About Euthanasia: Data From Four Regional Greek Hospitals. Cureus [Internet]. 2024 Feb 10; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/226993-investigation-on-the-attitudes-and-perspectives-of-medical-and-nursing-staff-about-euthanasia-data-from-four-regional-greek-hospitals
Kontaxaki MI, Paplos K, Dasopoulou M, Kontaxakis V. Psychiatry trainees’ attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Psychiatriki [Internet]. 2018 Apr 1;29(1):74–8. Available from: https://www.psychiatriki-jour-nal.gr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1430&Itemid=992&lang=en
Parpa E, Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Sakkas P, Patiraki E, Pistevou-Gombaki K, et al. Attitudes of health care pro-fessionals, relatives of advanced cancer patients and pub-lic towards euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Health Policy (New York) [Internet]. 2010 Oct;97(2–3):160–5. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168851010001107
Yun YH, Sim JA, Choi Y, Yoon H. Attitudes toward the Le-galization of Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 1;19(9).
Bravo G, Trottier L, Rodrigue C, Arcand M, Downie J, Du-bois MF, et al. Comparing the attitudes of four groups of stakeholders from Quebec, Canada, toward extending medical aid in dying to incompetent patients with de-mentia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry [Internet]. 2019;34(7):1078–86. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/gps.5111
Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Evenblij K, Pasman HRW, van Delden JJM, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Heide A. Physicians’ and Public Attitudes Toward Euthanasia in People with Advanced Dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(10):2319–28.
Kouwenhoven PSC, Raijmakers NJH, van Delden JJM, Rietjens JAC, Schermer MHN, van Thiel GJMW, et al. Opinions of health care professionals and the public after eight years of euthanasia legislation in the Netherlands: A mixed methods approach. Palliat Med [Internet]. 2013;27(3):273–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216312448507
Rietjens JAC, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G. A comparison of atti-tudes towards end-of-life decisions: Survey among the Dutch general public and physicians. Soc Sci Med [Inter-net]. 2005;61(8):1723–32. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795360500119X
Tomlinson E, Stott J. Assisted dying in dementia: A sys-tematic review of the international literature on the atti-tudes of health professionals, patients, carers and the public, and the factors associated with these. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30(1):10–20.
Cohen J, Van Landeghem P, Carpentier N, Deliens L. Pub-lic acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: a survey study in 47 countries. Int J Public Health [Internet]. 2014;59(1):143–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0461-6
Mangino DR, Bernhard T, Wakim P, Kim SY. Assessing Public’s Attitudes Towards Euthanasia and Assisted Sui-cide of Persons With Dementia Based on Their Advance Request: An Experimental Survey of US Public. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;29(4):384–94.
van Teijlingen E, Hundley V. The importance of pilot stud-ies. Nursing Standard [Internet]. 2002 Jun 19;16(40):33–6. Available from: http://rcnpublishing.com/doi/abs/10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214
Conroy RM. The RCSI Sample Size Handbook- A Rough Guide. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland [Internet]. 2016;0(May):1–57. Available from: http://www.rcsi.ie/files/research/docs/20160811111051_Sample size 2016.pdf
Theofanidis D, Fountouki A. Ethics and Deontology in Nursing Research: A Discussion Paper. Int J Caring Sci [In-ternet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Mar 4];11(3):1982–9. Available from: www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org
Holloway HD, Hayslip B, Murdock ME, Maloy R, Servaty HL, Henard K, et al. Measuring Attitudes toward Euthana-sia. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying [Internet]. 1995 Feb 1;30(1):53–65. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2190/EQP2-KUFM-W7TH-BUTL
Malliarou M, Tzenetidis V, Papathanasiou I, Vourdami K, Tzenetidis N, Nikolentzos A, et al. Validation of the Greek Version of Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS) in Greek Medi-cal Doctors. Nurs Rep [Internet]. 2022 Apr 16;12(2):304–12. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/12/2/30
George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update [Internet]. 10th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2010. Available from: https://books.google.gr/books?id=KS1DPgAACAAJ
Hair J, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd edition. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2022.
Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd edition). London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009. 539–583 p.
Malhotra NK, Hall J, Shaw M, Oppenheim PP. Essentials of marketing research : an applied orientation [Internet]. TA - TT -. Frenchs Forest, NSW SE: Pearson Education Australia; 2004. Available from: https://worldcat.org/title/1057995194
Hayton JC, Allen DG, Scarpello V. Factor Retention Deci-sions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis. Organ Res Methods [Internet]. 2004 Apr 29;7(2):191–205. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675
Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociol Methods Res [Internet]. 1992 Nov 29;21(2):230–58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Sarmento R, Costa V. Comparative Approaches to Using R and Python for Statistical Data Analysis [Internet]. Her-shey PA: IGI Global; 2017 [cited 2024 Jan 26]. (Advances in Systems Analysis, Software Engineering, and High Per-formance Computing). Available from: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-68318-016-6
Taber KS. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Educa-tion. Res Sci Educ [Internet]. 2018 Dec 7;48(6):1273–96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Savalei V. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data. Multivariate Behav Res [Internet]. 2021 May 4;56(3):390–407. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1717922
Tang WK, Mak KK, Kam PMH, Ho JWK, Chan DCY, Suen TL, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS) for Hong Kong Medical Doctors. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® [Internet]. 2010 Aug 18;27(5):320–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909109358407
Onieva-Zafra MD, Fernández-Muñoz JJ, Parra-Fernandez ML, Romero-Blanco C, Fernández-Martínez E. Adaptation and validation of the Euthanasia Attitude Scale into Span-ish. Nurs Ethics [Internet]. 2020 Aug 25;27(5):1201–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019864162
