Uterine Transplants – Considerations of Legal Frameworks, Access for Transgender Women, and Ethical Considerations


Dianelys Ire Santos Pinero
Abstract

Uterine transplantations (UTx) are rapidly gaining popularity as an artificial reproductive technique (ART). Uterine transplantations (UTx) refer to a surgical procedure whereby a healthy uterus is transplanted from one person to another. Up to date, UTx procedures have been performed on cisgender women who struggle with some sort of infertility, whether that be Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility or Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, a disorder where someone is born without a uterus. Though this procedure is not currently offered as routine treatment in any country worldwide, it is essential to determine the key ethical and legal debates surrounding the procedure in order to determine whether current organ transplantation laws are adequate for this procedure, or if new legislation is necessary in order to capture the complex nature of the procedure. UTX not only involves the routine complexities of any organ donations, such as kidney donations, but it also creates a unique level of added harm for both the donor and the recipient. Currently, no country has suggested to bring forward specific legislation regarding this procedure. However, I will argue that it is essential to view this ART as a different level of organ donation, thus requiring an individual set of legislation. UTx specific legislation will aid to combat inequalities and prevent coercion at an international level. This article will establish three main considerations regarding this procedure. Firstly, I will ask whether a new legal framework is required in order to deal with the issue of uterine transplants, or will it be sufficient to apply current rules regarding organ transplantations? I will analyse laws regarding access to UTx in the following countries: Sweden, Lebanon, the United Kingdom, and the United States., I will seek to establish the medical and ethical considerations regarding access to uterus transplants for transgender women, how it would be physiologically possible, and the importance of allowing access to uterus transplants for this subgroup of women. I will seek to point out a myriad of ethical issues that arise from the procedure, such as deceased donations, fair distribution, whether the procedure should be made available for cisgender and transgender men, the principle of harm and whether this level of harm to the donor and to the recipient could be ethically acceptable, and finally, the right to procreate and where UTx lies within this right. Ultimately, I will seek to establish that a new and innovative set of legislation should be implemented in order to encapsulate the complex nature of UTx.

Article Details
  • Sezione
  • Reviews
Downloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Swedish Transplantation Act 1995:831
M. Bergius, T. Mattsson, L.Wahlberg, Uterine Transplantations in Sweden, International Le-gal and Ethical Perspectives on Uterus Trans-plantation, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, London, 2024: 230.
H. Haidar, T. Khansa and T. Arawi, Uterine transplantation in Lebanon: social, ethical, and legal considerations, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, London, 2024: 256-273.
V. Blake and S. Mohapatra, Regulating uterus transplantation: the United States, Edward El-gar Publishing Limited, London, 2024: 241-254.
A. Rosen, The Alabama Supreme Court’s Rul-ing on Frozen Embryos, John Hopkins Univer-sity, Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2024 <https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/the-alabama-supreme-courts-ruling-on-frozen-embryos>
N. Hammond-Browning, Regulating uterus transplantation: the United Kingdom, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, London, 2024: 276-288.
The Human Tissue Act 2004.
The Equality Act 2010.
BP. Jones, NJ. Williams, S. Saso, M-Y. Thum, I. Quiroga, J. Yazbek, S. Wilkinson, S. Ghaem-Maghami, P. Thomas, JR. Smith, Uterine Transplantation in Transgender Wom-en, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstet-rics & Gynaecology, Volume 126, Issue 2, 2019: 152.
R (on the application of TT) v The Registrar General for England and Wales [2019] EWHC 2384 (Fam).
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
Gender Recognition Act 2004.
A. Shetty, Y. Dong, J. Goldman, M. Akiska, B. Ranganath, Uterine Transplantation in Transgender Individuals as Gender Affirma-tion Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, 2023: 1.
B. Bruno, K. Shah Arora, Uterus Transplanta-tion: The Ethics of Using Deceased Versus Living Donors, American Journal of Bioeth-ics, Volume 18, Issue 7, 2018: 7.
Lavoué, V., C. Vigneau, S. Duros, K. Bou-djema, J. Levêque, P. Piver, Y. Aubard, T. Gauthier., Which donors for uterus trans-plants: Brain-dead donor or living donor? A systematic review, Transplantation 101(2), 2017: 271.
Swedish National Council on Medical Ethics, (SMER) S1985:A/2016/00675 2016-09-26.
R. Tonkens, Gatekeeping uterus transplants: a proposal for eligibility criteria and the fair al-location of wombs, International Legal and Ethical Perspectives on Uterus Transplanta-tion, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Lon-don, 2024: 140-142.
MJ. Bayefsky, E. Berkman, The Ethics of Al-locating Uterine Transplants, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016: 353-361.
M. Akan, Transplant health inequities research from an operations perspective, Health Sci-ences Review 11, 100176, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, USA, 2024: 1.
JMJJ. Mavuso, Repronormativity in cisgender men’s reasons why they would not use womb transplant technology to become pregnant, Sociology Compass, Volume 17, Issue 2, e13054, Sociology Department, University of Pretoria, Lynwood, South Africa, 2022: 11-13.
G. Barn, A right to gestate? Uterus transplants and the language of rights, International Legal and Ethical Perspectives on Uterus Transplan-tation, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, London, 2024: 61-72.
R. Chmel, Z. Pastor, J. Matecha, L. Janousek, M. Novackova, J. Fronek, Uterine transplanta-tion in an era of successful childbirths from living and deceased donor uteri: Current chal-lenges, Biomedical Papers, Medical Faculty University of Palacky Olomouc, Czech Re-public, 2020: 116.
M. Lotz, Uterus transplantation and adoption in the empirical and normative context: the question of alternative parenthood modalities, International Legal and Ethical Perspectives on Uterus Transplantation, Edward Elgar Pub-lishing Limited, London, 2024: 54.