Lie detection in the brain - Moral, social, legal and religious challenges


Chrysa G Poulou
Abstract

Lie detection and recognition has been an ardent human desire since ancient times. Over the centuries, various methods have been devised to detect fraud. Some methods are low-tech, like the recognition of specialized facial expressions, while others use devices, such as the polygraph or "lie detector" designed in the early 20th century, which measure changes in human body like sweating, heart rate and blood pressure, in order to detect the lie. These methods have various applications in areas such as justice, the military and the secret services.

 Recent attempts to detect falsehood have focused on measuring brain activity. This approach, unlike previous emotional arousal methods, detects physiological changes associated with cognitive processes during deception and therefore, according to the proponents of the technique, could detect the process of deception itself. The most well-known method of detecting a "neurophysiological difference between deception and truth" in the brain is functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), an MRI brain scan which reveals that deception is located in the prefrontal cortex, just behind the forehead.

However, how accurate and reliable are these “brain mapping” approaches to detect lies? What are the moral, legal, religious and social issues arising from the “invasion” of so-called neuroscience into personal data, individual freedom, and the right of non-self-incrimination and the "free will" of human beings? Critical questions, addressed in this paper, in an attempt to approach lie detection in the brain and the challenges - concerns that may determine the way we perceive human society in the future.

Article Details
  • Sezione
  • Reviews
Downloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Correction for Eklund et al. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016, 113 (33).
Devlin H. What is Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)? Psych Central 2018. https://psychcentral.com/lib/what-is-functional-magnetic-resonance-imaging-fmri/.
Eklund A, Nichols TH, Knutsson H. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016, 113 (28): 7900-7905.
Ekman P. Why Don’t We Catch Liars? Social Research 1996, 63(3): 801-817.
Ekman, P. Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. New York - London: W.W.Norton & Company Inc, 1992.
European Magnetic Resonance Forum. Magnetic Resonance, a critical peer - reviewed introduction: functional MRI 2017. https://www.magnetic-resonance.org/ch/11-03.html.
Farah MJ, Hutchinson B, Phelps E, Wagner A. Functional MRI-based lie detection: Scientific and societal challenges. Nature reviews, Neuroscience 2014, 15: 123-131.
Farah MJ. Neuroethics: The Ethical, Legal, and Societal Impact of Neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology 2012, 63(1): 571-591.
Farah MJ, Heberlein AS. Personhood and neuroscience: naturalizing or nihilating? Am. J. Bioeth. Neurosci. 2007, 7(1): 37-48.
Ganis G, Rosenfeld JP, Meixner, J, Kievit RA., Schendan HE. Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage, 2011, 55(1): 312‐319.
Ganis G, Kosslyn SM, Stose S, Thompson WL, Yurgelun - Todd DA. Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 2003, 13(8): 830-836.
Granhag P, Strömwall L. Research on deception detection: Past and present. In: The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts, Chapter: 1, Publisher: Cambridge University Press, Editors: Pär Anders Granhag, Leif Strömwall, 2004: 3-12.
Greely HT, Illes J. Neuroscience-based lie detection: the urgent need for regulation. Am. J. Law Med. 2007, 33(2-3): 377‐431.
Hamann S, Canli T. Individual differences in emotion processing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2004, 14(2):233-238.
Heckman KE, Happel MD. Mechanical Detection of Deception: A Short Review in Educing information: Interrogation: Science and art—foundations for the future, ed. by Swenson, R.. Washington, DC: National Defense Intelligence College Press, 2006: 63-94.
Huettel SA, Song AW, McCarthy G. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2nd ed.), Massachusetts: Sinauer, 2009.
Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Translated and Edited by Guyer Paul & Wood Allen. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Kubis J. Medicine and Lie-Detection, The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 11: No. 2, Article 2, 1943.
Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, Goldberg IE, Weisskoff RM, Poncelet BP, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation 1992, 89: 5675-5679.
Langleben DD, Moriarty JC (2013). Using brain imaging for lie detection: where science, law and research policy collide. Psychology, public policy, and law: an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law 2013, 19(2), 222-234.
Langleben DD, Schroeder L, Maldjian JA, et al. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage 2002, 15: 727-732.
Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Auguth M., Trinath, T., Oeltermann, A. A neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the BOLD signal in fMRI, Nature 2001, 412 (6843): 150-157.
Lieberman MD, Berkman ET, Wager TD. Correlations in Social Neuroscience Aren't Voodoo: Commentary on Vul et al. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009, 4 (3): 299-307.
Messer N. Judging the secret thoughts of all: Functional neuroimaging, ‘brain reading,’ and the theological ethics of privacy. Studies in Christian Ethics 2021, 34(1):17-35.
Mueller K, Lepsien J, Möller HE, Lohmann G. Commentary: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2017, 11:345.
Narayan A. The fMRI brain scan: A better lie detector? Time, 2009. https://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1911546-1,00.html.
National Research Council (NRC). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, D.C: National Academy of the United States, 2009.
Nee DE. fMRI replicability depends upon sufficient individual-level data. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2 (1): 130.
Sahito F, Slany W. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Challenge of Balancing Human Security with State Security, Human Security Perspectives Journal 2012, (1): 38-66.
Stoller SE, Wolpe PR. Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie Detection and the Fifth Amendment. Published in American Journal of Law and Medicine 2007, 33 (2/3) 359-375.
Tovino SA. Imaging body structure and mapping brain function: a historical approach. Am. J. Law Med. 2007, 33(2-3) 193-228.
Turner BO, Santander T, Paul EJ, et al. Reply to: fMRI replicability depends upon sufficient individual-level data. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2, 129.
Turner BO, Paul EJ, Miller MB, et al. Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies. Commun Biol 2018, 1, 62.
Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H. Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009, 4(3):274‐290.
Weinberg S. The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe - Updated. New York: Basic Books, 1993.
Ασημακοπούλου Ι. Ανιχνευτής Ψεύδους (Lie Detector). Νομικές Μελέτες on line. (1269), 2005.
Γκότση Γ. Neuroscience and criminal law: promises and limitations for the assessment of criminal responsibility. Bioethica 2016, 2(2) 19-35.
Κωστόπουλος, Γ. Βιοηθική, 2015.
Μπαμπινιώτης, Γ. Λεξικό της Νέας Ελληνικής Γλώσσας. Αθήνα: Κέντρο Λεξικολογίας, 2002.
Παπαδόπουλος Γ, Κούβελας Η. Το σύμπαν των εγκεφάλων, University Studio Press, Θεσσαλονίκη, 2011.
Παπαδόπουλος Χ. Η Αγιότητα ως Έκφραση της Ηθικής Αυτονομίας. Πεμπτουσία, Θεσσαλονίκη, 2017.
Παπανδρέου - Γιαννακάκη Χ. Ανίχνευση Ψεύδους. Μη Λεκτική Συμπεριφορά. Διπλωματική Εργασία ΜΠΣ Γνωσιακή Επιστήμη, ΜΙΘΕ, ΕΚΠΑ, 2012.