Κοινωνική επιχειρηματικότητα και σωφρονιστική. Προτεινόμενο μοντέλο εργασιακής επανένταξης έγκλειστων και αποφυλακισμένων στην Ελλάδα
Abstract
This article explores the dynamics of developing Social Enterprises, within and outside Greek detention centers, by inmates and ex-prisoners respectively. Initially, a historical overview of the right to work for people living in detention centers is presented, while a thorough and critical assessment of the current institutional framework in Greece, regarding employment opportunities it offers, is made. The prospects of developing Social Enterprises both inside and outside detention facilities is furthermore evaluated, while a model of cooperation between third, private and public sector bodies is proposed. The reasons why social enterprises, and third sector organizations in general, can successfully engage in the field of social and work integration or reintegration of prisoners or ex-prisoners are being elaborated on and coupled with examples of partnerships from abroad. A set of valid arguments is put forth as to the necessity of partnerships -both in terms of economy and performance- as well as to the need to develop programs whose effectiveness will eventually be evaluated on the basis of a series of indicators that are specially made for the program in question. In light of the aforestated best practices from abroad, we shall subsequently come up with a framework of cooperation between the Third, the Private and the Public Sector: the aforementioned framework is to be duly structured and analyzed as to its individual features within our proposal and is intertwined with the implementation of a pilot program in rural prisons in Greece.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Τσιλίκης Χ., & Γάκου Ε. Μ. (2018). Κοινωνική επιχειρηματικότητα και σωφρονιστική. Προτεινόμενο μοντέλο εργασιακής επανένταξης έγκλειστων και αποφυλακισμένων στην Ελλάδα. Social Policy, 9, 88–110. https://doi.org/10.12681/sp.15987
- Issue
- Vol. 9 (2018)
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Albrecht, H.-J. (1999). Penal Policies and Criminal Sanctions: A Look at Developments and Trends in Europe. In: The Changing Face of Crime and Criminal Policy in Europe. Ed. R. Hood. Occasional Paper No. 19. Centre for Criminological Research. University of Oxford, Oxuniprint, Oxford, 1-23
Araya, M., & Tomassetti, P. (2012). Working While in Prison: an Experience from Milano-Bollate Detention Centre.
Broome, K. M., & Joe, G. W. (2002). The role of social support following short-term inpatient treatment. The American Journal on Addictions, 11, 57-65.
Center for Global Development. (2013). Investing in Social Outcomes: Development Impact Bonds The Report of the Development Impact Bond Working Group.
CIRIEC. (2012). Study on the situation of the Social Economy in the European Union and candidate countries. European Economic and Social Committee.
Davis, L. M. (2013). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Correctional Education: A Meta-Analysis of Programs That Provide Education to Incarcerated Adults. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporaton, 2013i.
Davister, C. D. (2004). “Work Integration Social Enterprises in the European Union: An Overview of Existing Models”, EMES Working Papers (no. 04/04).
Davister, C., Defourny, J., & Gregoire, O. (2004). «Wise Integration Social Enterprises In The European Union: An Overview Of Existing Models», Centre d'Economie Sociale, University of Liège (Belgium).
DiMaggio, P. P.-W. (1983). "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", American Sociological Review, 48, April, pp.147-160. .
Durnescu, I. (2011). Resettlement research and practices. An international perspective.
Dyson Mike. (2011). Reducing reoffending among short sentenced male offenders from Peterborough prison, Social Impact Bonds, Social Finance.
Emma Disley, C. G. (2015). The payment by results Social Impact Bond pilot at HMP Peterborough: final process evaluation report, RAND Europe.
Enzo dal Verme. (2017). Vantage. Retrieved from https://medium.com/vantage/made-in-prison-a-new-model-of-sustainable-social-enterprise-9166c69eace8
Galitopoulou Stellina. (2016). Understanding Social Impact Bonds: ΟΑΣΑ.
Glenys Dame, S. (2016). Quality & Impact inspection, The effectiveness of probation work in Durham, An inspection by HM Inspectorate of Probation.
Green Penny. (2008). Prison work and social enterprise:the story of Barbed, The Howard League for Penal Reform, Esmee Fairbairn Foundation.
Griffiths, A., & Meinicke, C. (2014). Introduction to Social Impact Bonds and early intervention, Initial Report, Early Intervention Foundation.
HM Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland. (2013). Report on HMP Low Moss.
Nyssens, M. (2006). Social Enterprise. At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society. New York: Routledge.
Osborne, S. P., Bond, S., Dutton, M., & Elric Honore. (2012). The Opportunities and Challenges of the Changing Public Services Landscape for the Third Sector in Scotland: A Longitudinal Study Year One Report: Baseline Findings. Employment Research Institute, Edinburgh Napier University Business School & Centre for Public Services Research, University of Edinburgh Business School.
Ready for Business. (2017). Retrieved 09 02, 2017, from http://readyforbusiness.org/public-social-partnerships/: http://readyforbusiness.org/public-social-partnerships/
Simpson, D., & Brown, B. (1999). (Eds.) ‘Treatment process and outcome studies from DATOS’ Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57(2). .
Αλεξιάδης, Σ. (2001). Σωφρονιστική, Εκδόσεις Σάκκουλα Α.Ε. .
Γεώργιος Π. Νικολόπουλος. (2005). Το ζήτημα της επαγγελματικής επανένταξης των πρώην καταδίκων: θεωρητικές επισημάνσεις, ερευνητικά πορίσματα και κοινωνικές δράσεις. Επιθεώρηση Κοινωνικών Ερευνών. 118. 2005, 95-118 .
ΕΠΑΝΟΔΟΣ. (2017). Retrieved 09 02, 2017, from http://www.epanodos.org.gr/web/guest/skopos-stochoi.
Μηλιώνη Α. Φωτεινή. (2015). Έγκλημα και Ποινική Καταστολή σε εποχή κρίσης. Τιμητικός Τόμος Καθηγητή Νέστορα Κουράκη, Τίτλος άρθρου: Προγράμματα επανένταξης αποφυλακισμένων.
ΟΟΣΑ. (2016). Social Impact Bonds: State of Play and Lessons Learnt.
ΟΟΣΑ. (2016). Policy Brief on Scaling the Impact of Social Enterprises: Policies for Social Enterprises.
ΟΟΣΑ. (2015). Social Impact Bonds: Promises & Pitfalls, Summary Report.
Πανούσης Γ. (1987). Θεμελιώδη Ζητήματα Εγκληματολογίας, εκδ. Σάκκουλας, Αθήνα.
Παπαθεοδώρου, Θ. (2002). Δημόσια Ασφάλεια & Αντεγκληματική Πολιτική. Αθήνα, Νομική Βιβλιοθήκη.
Σπινέλλη, Κ. (2005). Εγκληματολογία – Σύγχρονες και παλαιότερες κατευθύνσεις, Αθήνα – Κομοτηνή, Σάκκουλας.
Τσιλίκης Α. Χρήστος. (2017). Από τις κοινωνικές υπηρεσίες στις κοινωνικές επιχειρήσεις. Ο ρόλος της τοπικής αυτοδιοίκησης στην ανάπτυξη κοινωνικών επιχειρήσεων με σκοπό την ένταξη στην αγορά εργασίας και την κοινωνική ενσωμάτωση ευπαθών κοινωνικών ομάδων. Διδακτορική Διατριβή, Πάντειο.
Χάϊδου, Α. (2002). Το σωφρονιστικό σύστημα- ζητήματα θεωρίας και πρακτικής. Αθήνα, Νομική Βιβλιοθήκη.
