Intergenerational Occupational Persistence across the Worlds of Welfare in the EU

PDF (ελληνικά)
Pubblicato: Sep 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/sp.14602
Stefanos Papanastasiou
Δημοκρίτειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θράκης
Christos Papatheodorou
Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο
Abstract

This paper investigates the intergenerational persistence in the occupational status across the four EU welfare regimes. Utilizing EU-SILC 2005 microdata through multinomial logit models, the paper brings to the forefront the performance of different social protection systems vis-à-vis intergenerational occupational persistence. The countries of the Liberal welfare regime exhibit the highest persistence and those of the Social-democratic welfare regime the lowest one, while the countries of the Conservative-Corporatist and the South-European welfare cluster place themselves somewhere in between. These findings imply a success-story in intercepting the intergenerational persistence in occupations by the regulatory and redistributive mechanisms of the Social-democratic welfare state. 

Article Details
  • Sezione
  • Άρθρα
Creative Commons License

TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.

Οι συγγραφείς των άρθρων που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατηρούν τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας επί των άρθρων τους, δίνοντας στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης. Άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατίθενται με άδεια Creative Commons 4.0 και σύμφωνα με την άδεια μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται ελεύθερα, με αναφορά στο/στη συγγραφέα και στην πρώτη δημοσίευση για μη κερδοσκοπικούς σκοπούς και με δικαίωμα τροποποίησης μόνον με παρόμοια διανομή (αν αναμείξετε, τροποποιήσετε, ή δημιουργήσετε πάνω στο υλικό, πρέπει να διανείμετε τις δικές σας συνεισφορές υπό την ίδια άδεια όπως και το πρωτότυπο).

Downloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
Biografie autore
Stefanos Papanastasiou, Δημοκρίτειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θράκης
Διδάκτωρ ΔΠΘ
Christos Papatheodorou, Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο
Καθηγητής, Τμήμα Κοινωνικής Πολιτικής, Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο


http://ineobservatory.gr/human-resources/papatheodorou-christos/
Riferimenti bibliografici
Banerjee, A. & Newman, A., (1993), “Occupational choice and the process of development”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 101, pp. 274-298.
Becker, G. & Tomes, N., (1979), “An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, pp. 1153-1189.
Becker, G. & Tomes, N., (1986), “Human capital and the rise and fall of families”, Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 1-39.
Boggess, S. & Corcoran, M., (1999), “Cycles of disadvantage?”, In Boggess S, Corcoran M & Jenkins S (Eds.): Cycles of disadvantage?, Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies.
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H., (2002), “The inheritance of inequality”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16 (3), pp. 3-30.
Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J., (1999), “Class inequality and meritocracy: A critique of Saunders and an alternative analysis”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 50, pp. 1-27.
Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J., (2001), Class, mobility and merit: The experience of two British birth cohorts, European Sociological Review, Vol. 17, pp. 81-101.
Causa, O., Dantan, S. & Johanson, A., (2009), “Intergenerational social mobility in European OECD countries”, OECD Working Paper No 50, Paris: OECD.
Carneiro, P. & Heckman, J., (2003), “Human capital policy”, NBER Working Paper 9495, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Corcoran, M., (1995), “Rags to rags: Poverty and mobility in the United States”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 21, pp. 237-267.
Corcoran, M. & Adams, T., (1997), “Race, sex and the intergenerational transmission of poverty”, In Duncan, G. & Brooks-Gunn, J. (Eds.): Consequences of growing up poor, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 461–517.
d’ Addio, A., (2007), “Intergenerational transmission of disadvantage: Mobility or immobility across generations? A review of the evidence for OECD countries”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 52, Paris: OECD.
Durlauf, S., (2006), “Group, social influences and inequality: A membership theory perspective on poverty traps”, In Bowles, S., Durlauf, S. & Hoff, K. (Eds.): Poverty traps, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Eckstein, Z. & Zilcha, I., (1994), “The effects of compulsory schooling on growth, income distribution and welfare”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 54, pp. 339-359.
Erikson, R. & Goldthorpe, J., (2002), “Intergenerational inequality: A sociological perspective”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16 (3), pp. 31-44.
Esping-Andersen, G., (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Oxford: Policy Press.
Esping-Andersen, G., (2004), “Untying the Gordian knot of social inheritance”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 21, pp. 115-139.
Ferrera, M., (2000), “Restructuring the welfare state in Southern Europe”, In Kuhnle S (Ed): Survival of the European welfare state, London: Routledge, pp. 131-155.
Fisher, C., Hout, M., Jankowski, M., Lucas, S., Swidler, A., & Voss, K., (1996), Inequality by design: Cracking the bell curve myth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fujita, M., Krugman, P. & Venables, A. (1999), The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Galor, O. & Zeira, J., (1993), “Income distribution and macroeconomics”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60, pp. 35-52.
Goldthorpe, J., (2012), Understanding – and misunderstanding – social mobility in Britain: The entry of the economists, the confusion of politicians and the limits of educational policy, Oxford: Oxford University.
Haveman, R., Wolfe, B. & Spalding, J., (1991), “Childhood events and circumstances influencing high school completion”, Demography, Vol. 28, pp. 133-157.
Heckman, J. & Rubinstein, Y., (2001), “The importance of non-cognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91 (2), pp. 145-149.
Heckman, J., Stixrud, J. & Urzua, S., (2006), “The effects of cognitive and non-cognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior”, Journal of Labor Economics, 2006, Vol. 24, pp. 411-482.
Herrnstein, R. & Murray, C., (1994), The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life, New York: Free Press.
Hilbe, J., (2009), Logistic regression models, New York: CRC Press.
Krugman, P., (1991), “Increasing returns and economic geography”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, pp. 483-499.
Leibfried, S., (1993), “Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community”, In Jones, C. (Ed.): New perspectives on the welfare state in Europe, London & New York: Routledge.
Lewis, O., (1965), La Vida: a Puerto Rican family in the culture of poverty, New York: Random House.
Lewis, O., (1969), “The culture of poverty”, In Moynihan, D. (Ed): On understanding poverty, New York: Basic Books, pp. 187-200.
Long, J. & Ferrie, J., (2006), “A tale of two labour markets: Intergenerational occupational mobility in Britain and the U.S. since 1850”, NBER Working Paper No. 11253.
Long, J. S. & Freese, J., (2006), Regression models for categorical dependent variables using STATA, Stata Press: Texas.
Loury, G., (1981), “Intergenerational transfers and the distribution of earnings”, Econometrica, Vol. 49, pp. 843-867.
Maitre, B. & Whelan, C., (2008), General data quality issues in the EU-SILC 2005 intergenerational module, Dublin: EQUALSOC.
Mayer, S., (1997), What money can’ t buy: Family income and children’ s life chances, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mazumder, B., (2001), Earnings mobility in the US: A new look at intergenerational inequality, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley.
Mazumder, B., (2005), “Fortunate sons: New estimates of intergenerational mobility in the US using social security earnings data”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 87 (2), pp. 235-255.
Mead, L., (1986), Beyond entitlement: The social obligations of citizenship, New York: Free Press.
Mead, L., (1992), The new politics of poverty: The nonworking poor in America, New York City: Harper Collins.
Mookherjee, D. & Ray, D., (2003), “Persistent inequality”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, pp. 369—93.
Murray, C., (1984), Losing ground: American social policy, 1950-1980, New York: Basic Books.
Nolan, Β., Esping-Andersen, G., Whelan, C., Maitre, B. & Wagner, S., (2011), “The role of social institutions in intergenerational mobility”, In Erikson R., Jantti, M. & Smeeding, T. (Eds.): Intergenerational mobility within and across nations, New York: Russell Sage.
Papanastasiou, S., Papatheodorou, C. & Petmesidou, M., (2016), “Child poverty and intergenerational poverty transmission in the EU: What is the impact of social protection policies and institutions?”, In Petmesidou, M., Delamonica, E., Papatheodorou, C. and Aldrie, H-L. (eds): Child poverty, youth (un) employment and social inclusion, CROP International poverty studies, Vol. 1, Stuttgart: CROP/Ibidem, pp. 67-89.
Papanastasiou, S. & Papatheodorou, C., (2010), Intergenerational transmission of poverty in the EU: An empirical analysis, Paper presented at the 1st IIPPE, Crete: Rethymno.
Papatheodorou, C & Papanastasiou S (2010), Intergenerational poverty transmission and social protection in the EU: Theoretical and empirical analysis, Athens: INE/GSEE.
Saunders, P., (1996), Unequal but fair? A study of class barriers in Britain, London: IEA.
Saunders, P., (1997), “Social mobility in Britain: An empirical evaluation of two competing theories”, Sociology, Vol. 31, pp. 261-288.
Saunders, P, (2002), “Reflections on the meritocracy debate in Britain: A response to Richard Breen and John Goldthorpe”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 53, pp. 559-574.
Shelling, T., (1971), “Dynamic models of segregation”, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 1, pp. 143-186.
Strenze, T., (2007), “Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research”, Intelligence, Vol. 35, pp. 401-426.
Torche, F, (2013), How do we characteristically measure and analyze intergenerational mobility?, New York: Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality.