Diversity. A critical approach
Published:
Jan 27, 2021
Keywords:
diversity inequality mobility democracy context
Abstract
In this paper ‘‘diversity’’ is scrutinized under four different angles. The first is to place it in a genealogy of scientific and political concepts which describe and assess urban societies, stressing that this concept denotes a further step away from egalitarian discourses and policies. The second is an examination of the relationship between diversity and inequality, inspired by François Dubet’s (2010) elaboration on the relation between unequal class positions and unequal opportunities. The third discusses the relation between diversity and spatial mobility and, particularly, the constrained mobility of labour legitimated based on individuals’ essentialised otherness. The fourth and last angle, is a comment on the relationship between diversity and democracy, pinpointing that the rise of diversity in political discourse has been increasingly concomitant with the limitation of democracy in terms of effective political alternatives as well as in terms of the limited political rights for many of those who constitute this diversity. Overall, the paper stresses the ambivalent relation of policies and discourses promoting diversity with the egalitarian project when the rights of diverse groups are founded on fixed identities and essentialized differences.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Maloutas, T. (2021). Diversity. A critical approach. The Greek Review of Social Research, 156, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.25942
- Issue
- 2021: 156
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anthias, F. (2013). Moving beyond the Janus face of integration and diversity discourses: towards an intersectional framing. The Sociological Review, 61 (2), pp. 323-343. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12001.
Arblaster, A. (1991). Democracy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Barber, R. B. (1998). A passion for democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bassand, M., Kaufmann, V., Joye, D. (2007). Enjeux de la sociologie urbaine. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
Benn, M. W. (2008). Against diversity. New Left Review, 52, pp. 33-36.
Bertossi, C. (2016). La citoyenneté à la française. Valeurs et réalités. Paris: Editions CNRS.
Benhabib, S. (Ed.) (1996). Democracy and difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘‘actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34 (3), pp. 349-379. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00246
Çaglar, A. (2016). Still ‘‘migrants’’ after all those years: foundational mobilities, temporal frames and emplacement of migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42 (6), pp. 952-969.
doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126085
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
Dubet, F. (2010). Les places et les chances. Repenser la justice sociale. Paris: Seuil.
Glick Schiller, N. (2014). Displacements, global constraints and transnational futures. Keynote paper presented at Tricud Migration & Change Final International Conference, Université de Liège, May 14-16.
Glick Schiller, N. and Caglar, A. (2016). Displacement, emplacement and migrant newcomers: Rethinking urban sociabilities within multiscalar power. Identities, 23 (1), pp. 1-16. doi:10.1080/ 1070289X.2015.1016520
Grefmeyer, Y. and Joseph, I. (1984). La ville-laboratoire et le millieu urbain. In Yves Grefmeyer and Isaac Joseph (Eds), L'école de Chicago, naissance de l’écologie urbaine (pp. 5-52). Paris: Aubier.
Hahnel, R. and Wright, E. O. (2016). Alternatives to capitalism. London: Verso.
Hall, S. (2002). Democracy, globalization, and difference. In Okwui Enwezor (Ed.), Documenta 11_Platform 1: Democracy Unrealized. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz.
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Häussermann, H. (2005). The end of the European city?. European Review, 13 (2): pp. 237-249.
Häussermann, H. and Haila, A. (2008). The European city: A conceptual framework and normative project.” In Yuri Kazepov (Ed.), Cities of Europe (pp. 43-63). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hern, A. (2017 February 6). Apple, Google, Facebook and Microsoft file opposition to Trump's travel ban. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/06/apple-google-facebook-microsoft-file-opposition-to-donald-trump-immigration-ban
Jessop, B. (2004). Spatial fixes, temporal fixes, and spatio-temporal fixes. On-line papers—Lancaster University https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/jessop-spatio-temporal-fixes.pdf
Lenoir, R. (1974). Les exclus. Un Français sur dix. Paris: Seuil.
Macpherson, Crawford B. (1973). Democratic theory: Essays in retrieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malleson, T. (2014). After occupy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maloutas, Th. (2004). Segregation and residential mobility spatially entrapped social mobility and its impact on segregation in Athens. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11 (3), pp. 195–211. doi:10.1177/0969776404041422
Maloutas, Th. and Pantelidou Malouta, M. (2004). The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28 (2), pp. 449-465. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00528.x
Maloutas, Th. and Pantelidou Malouta, M. (2012). Fragmented ideologies: blending egalitarian beliefs and liberalism across Europe. Paper presented at the Second ESS Conference Cross-National Evidence from European Social Survey: Exploring Public Attitudes, Informing Public Policy in Europe, European University of Cyprus. Nicosia, November 23-25.
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking private vs. public sector myths. London: Anthem.
Milanovic, Br. (2016). Global inequality. A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
Mouffe, Ch. (1993). The return of the political. London: Verso.
Mouffe, Ch. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.
Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nash, K. (1998). Beyond liberalism? Feminist theories of democracy. In Vicky Randall and Georgina Waylen (Eds), Gender, politics and the state (pp. 45-57). London: Routledge.
Noack, R. (2015, December 14). Multiculturalism is a sham, says Angela Merkel. The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/12/14/angela-merkel-multiculturalism-is-a-sham/
Pantelidou Maloutas, M. (2006). The gender of democracy. London: Routledge.
Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Piketty, Th. (2014). Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
Raco, M. and Kesten J. (2016). The politicisation of diversity planning in a global city: Lessons from London. Urban Studies, doi: 10.1177/0042098016674869.
Recchi, E. (2015). Mobile Europe. The theory and practice of free movement in the EU. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Savage, M. (2015). Social class in the 21st Century. London: Penguin Random House.
Tasan-Kok, T., van Kempen, R., Raco, M. and Bolt, G. (2013). Towards hyper-diversified european cities: A critical literature review. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Tissot, S. (2015). Good neighbors. Gentrifying diversity. London: Verso.
Urry, J. (2014). Offshoring. Cambridge: Polity.
Vertovec, St. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and racial studies, 30 (6), pp. 1024-1054. doi: 10.1080/01419870701599465
Vertovec, St. (2010). Towards post-multiculturalism? Changing communities, conditions and contexts of diversity. International Social Science Journal, 61 (199), pp. 83-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2010.01749.x
Young, I. M. (1987). Impartiality and the civic public. In Seyla Benhabib and Drucilla Cornell (Eds), Feminism as critique (pp. 56-76). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Young, I. M. (1990). Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. In Cass R Sunstein (Ed.), Feminism and political theory (pp. 117-142). C. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wacquant, L. (Ed.) (2005). Pierre Bourdieu and democratic politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Walzer, M. (1997). On toleration, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Weaver, M. (2010, October 17). Angela Merkel: German multiculturalism has ‘‘utterly failed’’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/17/angela-merkel-german-multiculturalism-failed
Wood, P. (2003). Diversity. The inception of a concept. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
