Understanding Los Angeles street art: Between social mobilization and urbanites awareness

PDF
Published: Jan 18, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.15812
Keywords:
Los Angeles Street Art Postmodernity Thirdspace Semiotic
Charles Joseph
University of Rennes 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-5857
Abstract

Ever since Los Angeles was annexed to the rest of the United States in 1848, the city’s publicists, better known as boosters, have fashioned a fantasized version of this newly acquired space that has impacted its very identity up until today. The dreamed Los Angeles was created in order to sell an ideal and, off course, land parcels. This mechanism was supported by a local neo-liberal government that chose to let the city’s Chamber of Commerce decide which course to take. This article aims at showing the impact that the dreamed Los Angeles had on the effective urban area and its inhabitants, and how this fantasized dimension of the city became the cornerstone that enabled its unparalleled development.It also seeks out to investigate how social mobilization is adjusting to this new urban order that oscillates constantly between two sets of rules, one made of illusions, the other made of uncompromising truths. Angelenos are thus exploring new ways to regain some humanness in a territory that seems to apprehend its inhabitants merely as socio-economic statistics. Social mobilization in Los Angeles is thus forced to take into account this fictionalized habit and fictionalizing process of the city to produce new ways of escaping it in order to exist outside of it, in a reality that concurs with their everyday Los Angeles. One particular practice that has gradually benefited from more and more visibility in the city since the beginning of the xxistcentury, is doing just that: Street Art.  This highly visual and visible practice is becoming, in Los Angeles, a social enactment that tends to reconceptualize social values as well as socializing practices.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Charles Joseph, University of Rennes 2
Adjunct lecturer, University of Rennes 2
References
Banham, R. (2009) [1971]. Los Angeles: The architecture of four ecologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1989). America. New York: Verso.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.
Baudrillard, J. (2007). Forget Foucault. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Berger, J. (2005). Berger on drawing. Cork: Occasional Press.
Davis, M. (1999). Ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster. New York: Vintage Books.
Degoutin, S. (2006). Prisonniers volontaires du rêve Américain. Paris: Editions de la Villette.
Entrikin, N. J. (1991). The betweenness of place: Towards a geography of modernity. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Estrada W. D. (2008). The Los Angeles Plaza: Sacred and contested space. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Fogelson, R. (1993) [1967]. The fragmented metropolis: Los Angeles 1850-1930. Berkeley / Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Hunt, D. M. (1997). Screening the Los Angeles “riots”: Race, seeing, and resistance. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. New York: Routledge.
Jones, K. (2011). Now dig this: Art &black Los Angeles 1960-1980. New York: Delmonico Books Prestel.
J.R. (2011).Wrinkles of the city: Los Angeles. Rome: Drago.
Klein, N. M. (2009). The history of forgetting: Los Angeles and the erasure of memory. London: Verso.
Krase, J. (2012). An argument for seeing in urban social science. Urbanities, 2 (1).
Krase, J. (2016) [2012]. Seeing cities change: Local culture and class. New York: Routledge.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Robbins, G. W. and Tilton, L. D. (1941). Los Angeles: Preface to a master plan. Los Angeles: The Pacific Southwest Academy.
Sawhney, D. N. (2002).Unmasking L.A.: Third Worlds and the city. New York: Palgrave.
Soja, E., (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford: Blackwell.
Soja, E., (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Timberg S. &Gioia D. (2003). The Misread City: New literary Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Red Hen Press.
Zimmerman, T. (2008). Paradise promoted: The booster campaign that created Los Angeles 1870-1930. Santa Monica: Angel City Press.