A cure worse than the disease? The controversy on Twitter around a fake COVID-19 treatment from France

pdf
Published: Jul 26, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.38490
Keywords:
controversy, Covid-19, Twitter, discourse, network analysis, Iramuteq
Nikos Smyrnaios
Université de Toulouse
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2376
Panos Tsimpoukis
Université de Toulouse
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2157-3337
Charis Papaevangelou
University of Amsterdam
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2790-9321
Abstract

This paper analyzes both the network of actors and the network of the discourses mobilized in the controversy around Professor Didier Raoult and his Hydroxychloroquine-based therapeutic proposal against COVID-19. To confirm our hypothesis, we implement a sophisticated and innovative research method on a corpus of 1.2 million Tweets, which consists of applying a network analysis combined with a lexicometrics analysis. We show that the reaction peaks on Twitter were linked to important media events. Moreover, many groups clustered around the accounts of political figures and media outlets that received numerous mentions. Trump's and Bolsonaro's supporter groups also connected with the French-speaking pro-Raoult groups. The messages of the pro-Raoult combined anti-science conspiracy theories and a critique of the political economy of liberalism and its impasses

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
Nikos Smyrnaios, Université de Toulouse

Professor, Laboratoire d'Études et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales (LERASS)

Panos Tsimpoukis, Université de Toulouse

PhD researcher, Laboratoire d'Études et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales (LERASS)

Charis Papaevangelou, University of Amsterdam

Post-doctoral researcher, Institute for Information Law

References
Amselle, J.-L. (2017). Les nouveaux « nouveaux rouges bruns ». Lignes, 54(3), pp. 77–84. Cairn.info. https://doi.org/10.3917/lignes.054.0077
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open-source software for exploring and manipulating networks. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1341.1520
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Borra, E., & Rieder, B. (2014). Programmed method: Developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), pp. 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094
Boyadjian, J. (2016). Analyser les opinions politiques sur Internet: Enjeux théoriques et défis méthodologiques [J.-Y. Dormagen (Ed.)]. Dalloz.
Brennen, J. S., Simon, F. M., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-04/Brennen%20-%20COVID%2019%20Misinformation%20FINAL%20%283%29.pdf
Brossard, D. (2009). Media, scientific journals and science communication: Examining the construction of scientific controversies. Public Understanding of Science, 18(3), pp. 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507084398
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell, The SAGE Handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n14
Callon, M. (1986). Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction: La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc. L’Année Sociologique (1940/1948-), 36, pp. 169–208. JSTOR.
Charbonnier, P. (2020). Abondance et liberté: Une histoire environnementale des idées politiques. La Découverte.
Cointet, J.-P., & Parasie, S. (2019). Enquêter à partir des traces textuelles du web. Réseaux, 214–215(2–3), pp. 9–24. Cairn.info. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.214.0009
Fraisier, O., Cabanac, G., Pitarch, Y., Besançon, R., & Boughanem, M. (2018). #Élysée2017fr: The 2017 French Presidential Campaign on Twitter. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.14984
Fraser, N. (2014). Transnationalizing the public sphere [K. Nash (Ed.)]. Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), pp. 145-171.
Hendrix, J. (2023, February 6). Twitter API Changes Set to Disrupt Public Interest Research. Tech Policy Press. https://techpolicy.press/twitter-api-changes-set-to-disrupt-public-interest-research/
Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841200
Khatsenkova, S. (2023, March 2). Lab leak theory: 3 years on, will we ever know where COVID came from?. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/03/02/china-covid-lab-leak-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont-know-about-the-origins-of-the-virus
Latour, B. (2010, December). The year in climate controversy. ArtForum, 49(4), pp. 228–229.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
Leerssen, P. (2021, September 7). Platform research access in Article 31 of the Digital Services Act. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/power-dsa-dma-14/
Miège, B. (2010). L’espace public contemporain: Approche info-communicationnelle. Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
Monod, J.-C. (2017, September 27). Between post-truth and epistemocracy: Positioning a democratic politics. Esprit, 10, pp. 145–153.
Mouffe, C. (2002). For an agonistic public sphere. In O. Enwezor (Ed.), Democracy unrealized: Documenta 11, Platform 1 (pp. 87–97). Hatje Cantz Verlag.
Newman, S. (2023). Post-truth, postmodernism and the public sphere. In M. Conrad, G. Hálfdanarson, A. Michailidou, C. Galpin, & N. Pyrhönen (Eds.), Europe in the age of post-truth politics (pp. 13–30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_2
Ratinaud, P. (2009). Iramuteq: Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires (0.7 alpha 2 2020). LERASS. http://www.iramuteq.org
Ratinaud, P., Smyrnaios, N., Figeac, J., Cabanac, G., Fraisier, O., Hubert, G., Pitarch, Y., Salord, T., & Thonet, T. (2019). Structuration des discours au sein de Twitter durant l’élection présidentielle française de 2017. Entre agenda politique et représentations sociales. Réseaux, 214–215(2–3), pp. 171–208. Cairn.info. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.214.0171
Reinert, M. (1990). Alceste une méthodologie d’analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurelia De Gerard De Nerval. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 26(1), pp. 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910639002600103
Rieder, B., & Röhle, T. (2012). Digital Methods: Five Challenges. In D. M. Berry (Ed.), Understanding digital humanities (pp. 67–84). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371934_4
Rieder, B., & Smyrnaios, N. (2012). Pluralisme et infomédiation sociale de l’actualité: Le cas de Twitter. Réseaux, 176(6), pp. 105–139. Cairn.info. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.176.0105
Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. The MIT Press.
Scott, M. (2023, February 7). Elon Musk goes to war with researchers. POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/elon-musk-twitter-goes-to-war-with-researchers-api/
Smyrnaios, N. (2020). Pour une socio-économie politique de l’espace public numérique [Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Grenoble Alpes]. http://ephemeron.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/HDR_SMYRNAIOS.pdf
Smyrnaios, N., & Ratinaud, P. (2014). Comment articuler analyse des réseaux et des discours sur Twitter: L’exemple du débat autour du pacte budgétaire européen. Tic & Société, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ticetsociete.1578
Smyrnaios, N., & Ratinaud, P. (2017). The Charlie Hebdo attacks on Twitter: A comparative analysis of a political controversy in English and French. Social Media + Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117693647
Souillard, N., Sebbah, B., Loubère, L., Thiong-Kay, L., & Smyrnaios, N. (2020). Les Gilets jaunes, étude d’un mouvement social au prisme de ses arènes médiatiques. Terminal, 127. https://doi.org/10.4000/terminal.5671
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., & Puschmann, C. (Eds.). (2014). Twitter and Society. Peter Lang US. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1170-9