The Valuable Earth, Man as its Manager, and Systemic Value according to Holmes Rolston

PDF (ελληνικά)
Published: Mar 25, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.22644
Keywords:
Environmental Ethics; Systemic Value; Holmes Rolston; Anthropocentrism; Ecocentrism; Biosphere; Sustainability; Natural Resources
Evangelia Charalampous
Abstract

The article explores the environmental ethics of Holmes Rolston, focusing on the intricate relationship between nature and culture. It examines the ontological differences between humans and other living beings, emphasizing that while nature follows instinct, humans evolve through culture and possess moral agency. The author analyzes the tension between anthropocentric perspectives, such as the Rio Declaration, and non-anthropocentric views, like the World Charter for Nature, which acknowledges the intrinsic value of all life forms. Central to the discussion is Rolston's concept of "systemic value," where ecosystems are valued not merely for their utility to humans but for their role in creating and sustaining life's diversity. The text also addresses global socio-economic disparities (G7 vs. G77) and the challenges of national borders in managing finite natural resources. Ultimately, the author advocates for a "managerial" or "caretaker" role for humanity, based on Aristotelian moderation and a systemic sense of duty toward the biosphere.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Collins, Michael. “Foreword.” In Our Universe, by R. A. Gallant. National Geographic Society, 1980.
Goodland, Robert. “The case that the world has reached limits.” In Population, Technology, and Lifestyle, edited by R. Goodland, H. E. Daly, and S. El Serafy. Island Press, 1992.
Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, 1949.
Mares, Michael A. “Conservation in South America: Problems, Consequences and Solutions.” Science 233 (1986): 734–39.
McKibben, Bill. The End of Nature. Random House, 1989.
Mitchell, Edgar. In The Home Planet, edited by K. W. Kelley. Addison-Wesley, 1988.
Pelegrinis, Theodosis. Dictionary of Philosophy [Λεξικό της Φιλοσοφίας]. Ellinika Grammata, 2005.
Pelegrinis, Theodosis. Ethical Philosophy [Ηθική Φιλοσοφία]. Ellinika Grammata, 1997.
Protopapadakis, Evangelos D. Ecological Ethics [Οικολογική Ηθική]. Sakkoulas, 2005.
Rolston, Holmes. “Environmental Ethics: Values in and duties to the natural world.” In The Broken Circle: Ecology, Economics, Ethics, edited by F. Herbert Bormann and S. Kellert. Yale University Press, 1991.
Rolston, Holmes. “Global Environmental Ethics: A valuable Earth.” In A New Century for Natural Resource Management. Island Press, 1995.
UN Conference on Environment and Development. The Rio Declaration. UNCED Document A/CONF.151/5/Rev. 1, June 13, 1992.
UN General Assembly. World Charter for Nature. Resolution No. 37/7, October 28, 1982.
White, Lynn. “The Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis.” Science 155 (1967): 1203–1207.
Most read articles by the same author(s)