Benevolens vastator mundi: A critical evaluation of R. N. Smart’s argument and the parameter of ecofascism


Published: Jan 28, 2021
Keywords:
Negative Utilitarianism; R. N. Smart; Ecofascism; Environmental Ethics; Human Extinction; Elimination of Suffering; Kaarlo Pentti Linkola; Benevolent World-Exploder
Stavros Dimakopoulos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-3128
Abstract

This article examines the radical philosophical argument proposed by R. N. Smart in 1958, which suggests that the voluntary extinction of all human life could theoretically serve as the ultimate means to eliminate suffering. The study first analyzes this "Benevolent World-Exploder" argument through the lens of Negative Utilitarianism, which prioritizes the minimization of pain over the maximization of pleasure. The author then extends this analysis to contemporary theories of environmental ethics and "ecofascism," specifically referencing the views of Kaarlo Pentti Linkola. The paper explores the ethical paradox where the mass elimination of the human species is presented as a moral act intended to benefit the ecosphere as a whole by prioritizing the survival of the environment over human interests. Ultimately, the author provides a critical assessment of the logical and moral implications of viewing total destruction as a form of benevolence.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Acton, Henry Burrows, and John William Nevill Watkins. “Negative Utilitarianism”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 37 (1963): 83-114.
Arrhenius, Gustaf, and Krister Bykvist. Future Generations and Interpersonal Compensations. Moral Aspects of Energy Use. Uppsala: Uppsala Prints and Preprints in Philosophy, 1995.
Feen, Richard Harrow. “Keeping the Balance: Ancient Greek Philosophical Concerns with population and Environment”. Population and Environment 17 (1996): 447-458.
Hedenius, Ingemar. Fyra dygder. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers Förlag, 1955.
Kadlec, Erich. “Popper’s 'Negative Utilitarianism': From Utopia to Reality.” In Karl Popper's Response to 1938, edited by Peter Markl and Erich Kadlec, 107-121. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2008.
Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.
Linkola, Kaarlo Pentti. Can Life Prevail? A Radical Approach to the Environmental Crisis. London: Integral Tradition Publishing, 2009.
Nelson, Michael P. “Holists and Fascists and Paper Tigers...Oh My!.” Ethics and the Environment 1.2 (1996): 103-117.
Pearce, David. “The Pinprick Argument.” Accessed March 16, 2020. https://www.utilitarianism.com/pinprick-argument.html
Popper, Karl Raimund. Open Society and its Enemies, 1: The Spell of Plato. Princeton: University Press, 1971.
Protopapadakis, Evangelos. "Ecofascism: The Case of Kaarlo Pentti Linkola" [Οικοφασισμός: Η περίπτωση του Kaarlo Pentti Linkola]. In Environment, Society, Ethics. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Environmental Ethics [Περιβάλλον, Κοινωνία, Ηθική. Τόμος Πρακτικών 2ης Διεθνούς Ημερίδας περιβαλλοντικής Ηθικής], edited by Elena Papanikolaou, 76–80. Athens: Aeiforia - NGO Solon, 2010.
Russell, Bertrand. Marriage and Morals [Γάμος και Ηθική]. Translated by Giannis Dyriotis. Athens: Arsenidis, 1962.
Smart, Ninian. “Negative Utilitarianism.” Mind, New Series 67 (1958): 542-543.
Smart, John Jamieson Carswell. “Negative Utilitarianism.” In Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honor of John Watkins, edited by Fred D’Agostino and I. C. Jarvie, 35-46. Berlin: Springer, 1989.
Wolf, Clark. “Social Choice and Normative Population Theory: A Person Affecting Solution to Parfit’s Mere Addition Paradox.” Philosophical Studies 81 (1996): 263-282.
Zimmerman, Michael E. “The Threat of Ecofascism.” Social Theory and Practice 21.2 (1995): 207-238.