The mobile and immobile god-world in Xenophanes


Published: Nov 5, 2021
Keywords:
Xenophanes; Theology; Motion and Stillness; God-World; Pre-Socratic Philosophy; Pantheism; Critique of Anthropomorphism; Ionian Cosmology
Andreas Theodosiou
Abstract

This paper investigates the philosophical tension between the motion and stillness of the "god-world" in the thought of Xenophanes of Colophon. The author begins by examining Xenophanes' critique of traditional anthropomorphic religious beliefs and his subsequent constructive theological proposal. The core of the study addresses a seeming contradiction: the identification of a divine entity that is simultaneously mobile and immobile. Theodosiou argues that this contradiction is only apparent, resolved through the understanding of human cognitive limitations in grasping the divine. By distinguishing Xenophanes' position from both the Milesian focus on motion and the Parmenidean insistence on absolute stillness, the paper explores how Xenophanes' pantheistic "One God" remains essentially static in its divine essence while participating in the physical changes of the cosmos.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Burnet, John. Early Greek Philosophy. 2nd ed. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1908.
Cherniss, Harold. “The Characteristics and Effects of the Presocratic Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 12, no. 3 (1951): 319–345.
Christidis, Theodoros. Parmenides: A Philosopher of Being and Becoming [Παρμενίδης: Ένας Φιλόσοφος του Είναι και του Γίγνεσθαι]. Athens: Exantas, 2011.
Diels, Hermann, and Walther Kranz. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker: griechisch und deutsch. 6th ed. Zürich: Weidmann, 1952.
Finkelberg, Aryeh. “The Milesian Monistic Doctrine and the Development of Presocratic Thought.” Hermes 117, no. 3 (1989): 257–270.
Finkelberg, Aryeh. “Studies in Xenophanes.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 93 (1990): 103–167.
Finkelberg, Aryeh. “Xenophanes' Physics, Parmenides' Doxa and Empedocles' Theory of Cosmogonical Mixture.” Hermes 125, no. 1 (1997): 1–16.
Fränkel, Hermann. “Xenophanes’ Empiricism and his Critique of Knowledge.” In The Presocratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Alexander Mourelatos, 118–132. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Gomperz, Heinrich. “Problems and Methods of Early Greek Science.” Journal of the History of Ideas 4, no. 2 (1943): 161–176.
Graham, Daniel W. Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Granger, Herbert. “Early Natural Theology: The Purification of the Divine Nature.” In Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, edited by David Sider and Dirk Obbink, 163–200. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013.
Heidel, W. A. “Hecataeus and Xenophanes.” The American Journal of Philology 64, no. 3 (1943): 257–277.
Keyser, Paul. “Xenophanes’ Sun on Trojan Ida.” Mnemosyne 45, no. 3 (1992): 299–311.
Kirk, G. S., and J. E. Raven. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957.
Lesher, J. H. Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992.
McKirahan, Richard. Philosophy Before Socrates. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company Inc., 2010.
Robinson, T. M. Logos and Cosmos: Studies in Greek Philosophy. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2010.
Schindler, D. C. “The Community of the One and the Many: Heraclitus on Reason.” Inquiry 46, no. 4 (2003): 413–448.
Shirley, Darkus. “The Phren of the Noos in Xenophanes’ God.” Symbolae Osloenses: Norwegian Journal of Greek and Latin Studies 53, no. 1 (1978): 25–39.
Waterfield, Robin. The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and the Sophists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.