The critique of the theory of class struggle by K. Papaioannou
Abstract
This article examines Kostas Papaioannou’s systematic critique of Karl Marx’s theory of class struggle across his major works, including Marx and Marxism, The Genesis of Totalitarianism, and State and Philosophy. The author highlights Papaioannou’s observation that Marx did not present a unified theory but rather at least three distinct versions—found in the Communist Manifesto, The Poverty of Philosophy, and the Grundrisse—which varied between economic monism and the recognition of extra-economic factors like war and technology. Class struggle is analyzed not as an absolute historical law but as a relative phenomenon, often superseded by national or religious conflicts. A central theme is Papaioannou's description of the "new class"—the state bureaucracy—which emerges from a monopoly of political power rather than traditional economic ownership, illustrating a paradoxical verification of Marxist class theory within the Soviet model.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Koutroulis, S. (2023). The critique of the theory of class struggle by K. Papaioannou. Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (16-17), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.33684
- Issue
- No. 16-17 (2023)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).