Theatrocracy and Revolutionary Mass according to Kostas Papaioannou
Abstract
This article explores the concept of "theatrocracy" as developed by the Greek philosopher Kostas Papaioannou to describe the active participation of the Athenian Demos in organized social life during the 5th century BC. The author analyzes how tragic theater was integrated into state functions, serving as a synthesis of tragedy and democracy that fertilized the revolutionary mass with conscious meaning. Central to the study is the role of the Tragic Myth and "Dike" (Justice), which Papaioannou identifies not just as a judicial principle but as a metaphysical force ensuring cosmic order against human "Hubris". Furthermore, the paper contrasts the Athenian model with Classicist and Elizabethan theater to demonstrate how different social structures produce varying levels of historical agency within the masses. Ultimately, the paper highlights Papaioannou's re-evaluation of "theatrocracy" from Plato's negative critique to a positive foundation for political consciousness.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Kranidiotis, G. (2023). Theatrocracy and Revolutionary Mass according to Kostas Papaioannou . Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (16-17), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.33689
- Issue
- No. 16-17 (2023)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).