An Interpretative Misleading of the Term "Moral Reasoning"
Abstract
This article examines the concept of "moral reasoning" and addresses the common linguistic and conceptual pitfalls associated with its translation into Greek. The author argues that the cognitive processes underlying moral deliberation are essential for understanding moral judgments regarding right and wrong. The study highlights that transitions between stages of thought are crucial for assessing moral development, drawing heavily on the cognitive-developmental frameworks of Jean Piaget and Lawrence Kohlberg. A central focus of the paper is the technical process of translation; the author asserts that failing to adhere to specific linguistic rules often leads to a distorted rendering of the term in Greek, which in turn affects the psychological and philosophical interpretation of the concept. The study concludes by proposing a more accurate Greek rendering that preserves the original intent of "moral reasoning," ensuring that the transitions in moral thinking are correctly represented in educational and psychological contexts.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Proios, M. (2026). An Interpretative Misleading of the Term "Moral Reasoning". Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (20), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.44126
- Issue
- No. 20 (2025)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).