The Sovereign and the anthropology of institutions in Photius the Great and Machiavelli
Abstract
This article provides a comparative analysis of the political thought of Photius the Great (810-891) and Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), situating both within the tradition of the "Mirrors for Princes". The author explores how these two thinkers, despite their different historical contexts, address the relationship between ethics and politics through their advice to the sovereign. The study highlights their respective philosophical anthropologies, examining how they define human nature and the role of institutions in shaping the person of the leader. While Photius emphasizes the cultivation of Christian virtues and the leader as a moral exemplar for the community, Machiavelli presents a more pragmatic and realistic view of the political struggle and the necessity of maintaining power. Ultimately, the paper analyzes how these distinct approaches reflect broader shifts in the perception of institutional power and human agency.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Karousakis, K. (2022). The Sovereign and the anthropology of institutions in Photius the Great and Machiavelli . Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (15), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.30739
- Issue
- No. 15 (2022)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).