Permanent roommates in the transparent blockchain ecosystem

cover image
PDF
Published: Dec 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.35962
Valentini Grigoriadou
Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5538-4556
Konstantinos Koskinas
Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8193-2269
Abstract

In this article we present the interpretation of the results of a qualitative research conducted in 2022 as part of a doctoral thesis, the subject of which is the socio-psychological implications, caused by the application of the innovative blockchain technology in education and in our society in general. For the needs of this research, an experimental application for degree certification was created. Through its extensive use, the participants formed elaborate opinions based on their experiential interaction with blockchain technology. This study drew on semi-structured in-depth interviews. Data were collected from fourteen contemporary citizens with the scientific capacity of political and social studies. This research is a flash of illumination in the relationships developed between the members of the university community and the relationships beyond it, focusing on the main features of blockchain technology, security, immutability, traceability, availability, integrity, absence of a central authority, privacy, shifting security to the end user and possible use of tokens. The reflexive thematic analysis led to the construction of a more general theme: "Blockchain will form what we will be in the future" which captures how the participants perceive the future reality filtered through the differentiated needs of each of one's multiple identities. Two main themes were constructed under the overarching theme. Those two are: “blockchain as the Trojan horse of authorities and governing power” and “blockchain as the deus ex machina for modern man”. The adoption of blockchain technology as a tool to facilitate and simplify standard processes, meets the individual's need for validity, transparency, meritocracy, fairness and the emergence of truth. At the same time, participants express intense concern about the possibility of blockchain being instrumentalized as a new form of power in conjunction with new technologies such as 5G, AI, cloud computing, IoT and BDAA. The results of the research demonstrate the thorough attention that needs to be given to the conditions, in which the application of blockchain technology will be implemented in the field of education, in order to have the acceptance of the whole university community and society.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
Antonopoulos, A. (2014). Bitcoin security model: trust by computation A shift from trusting people to trusting math. O’Reilly: http://radar.oreilly.com/2014/02/bitcoin-security-model-trust-by-computation.html
Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C., & Peterson, M. F. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of organizational culture & climate. Sage Publications.
Barlow, J. P., (1996). A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Retrieved January 2020, from Electronic Frontier Foundation:
https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence
Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003
Brailas, A., Tragou, E., & Papachristopoulos, K. (2023). Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Festinger, L. (2001). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Reissued by Stanford Univ. Press in 1962, renewed 1985 by author, [Nachdr.]). Stanford Univ. Press.
Loukil, F., Abed, M., & Boukadi, K. (2021). Blockchain adoption in education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5779–5797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10481-8
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Ανάκτηση August 2019, από The paper that first introduced Bitcoin: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Reevers, B., & Nass, C. I. (1997). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Choice Reviews Online, 34(07), 34-3702-34–3702. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.34-3702
Reijers, W., O’Brolcháin, F., & Haynes, P. (2016). Governance in Blockchain Technologies & Social Contract Theories. Ledger, 1, 134–151. https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2016.62
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds), The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33-47. Brooks Cole.
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Portfolio / Penguin.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Virmani, C., Gupta, D., & Choudhary, T. (2019). Chapter 9- Blockchain 2.0: An Edge Over Technologies. In Architectures and Frameworks for Developing and Applying Blockchain Technology,167-188. IGI Global .
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9257-0
Γρηγοριάδου, Β., & Grigoriadou, V. (2022). Καινοτόμος μέθοδος αποθήκευσης και μετάδοσης δεδομένων, τεχνολογία Blockchain, κοινωνιο-ψυχολογικές επιπτώσεις, προσεγγίσεις και εφαρμογές στην εκπαίδευση και τη μάθηση [Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών, Σχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών, Τμήμα Ψυχολογίας]. https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/52359
Κατερέλος, Γ. Δ. (2008). Εισαγωγή στην Κοινωνική Έρευνα. Σημειώσεις. Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο,Τμήμα Ψυχολογίας.
Κοσκινάς, Κ., & Μπράιλας, Α. (2015). Η Κουλτούρα του Διαδικτύου: Η συλλογική αφήγηση μιας δικτυωμένης ζωής. Εργαστήριο Δυνητικής Πραγματικότητας, Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο. https://www.openbook.gr/i-koultoura-tou-diadiktyou
Μαντόγλου, Ά. (2012). Σημειώσεις Για το μάθημα Κοινωνική Επιρροή ΙΙ. Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Τμήμα Ψυχολογίας.
Παπαστάμου, Σ. (2008). Εισαγωγή στην Κοινωνική Ψυχολογία, Τόμος Β. Πεδίο.
Προδρομίτης, Γ. (2008). Η ανακάλυψη του "κοινού" και η εφεύρεση της "κοινής γνώμης" Από τον Gabriel Tarde. Εισαγωγή στην Κοινωνική Ψυχολογία-Στάμος Παπασταμου Τ.Β: Πεδίο.
Σταλίκας, Ά. (2005). Μέθοδοι έρευνας στην ψυχολογία. Στο Ά. Σταλίκας, Μέθοδοι έρευνας στην ψυχολογία, 183-190. Ελληνικά Γράμματα
Most read articles by the same author(s)