Physicochemical, Technological and Sensory Properties of Chicken Meatballs Processed with Dietary Fibers

PDF (English)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.20858
O. KILINCCEKER
Adiyaman University, Technical Sciences Vocational School, Department of Food Processing
M. TAHSIN YILMAZ
King Abdulaziz University, Engineering Faculty, Industrial Engineering Department; Yildiz Technical University, Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering Faculty, Department of Food Engineering
Abstract

In this study, raw chicken meatball samples were incorporated with apple, lemon and pea fibers at different concentrations (0, 4, 8 and 12%). Their physicochemical properties were evaluated at different refrigerated storage time spots (1st, 5th and 10th days) while the fried samples were investigated with respect to their color, technological and sensory properties. The results revealed that the physicochemical properties of raw samples were significantly (P <0.05) affected by fiber type and concentration within the storage periods while color, technological and sensory properties of the fried samples were also significantly changed (P <0.05) according to the fiber type and concentration. Thiobarbutiric acid reactive substance values of raw samples incorporated with the fibers were observed to be lower than those of the control samples at the end of the storage period, indicating that fiber addition could delay lipid oxidation increasing their storage stability. Fiber addition affected the brightness (L* values), redness (a* values) and yellowness (b* values) of both the raw and fried samples. Regarding technological properties of the fried samples, fiber addition generally increased (P <0.05) frying yield, and moisture retention values up to 4%, followed by a decrease at further concentrations. Meatball diameter decreased by addition at level of 4% for all fiber types, but further increase in the fiber concentration did not decrease these values. The maximum fat retention was observed in the fried samples incorporated with the apple and lemon fibers at 12 % concentration. Sensory properties were affected by fiber concentration up to 8%, which constituted the highest tolerated concentration. As a result, fiber addition positively affected the physicochemical and technological properties of the meatballs, but this affect was strongly related to the fiber type and its concentration.

Article Details
  • Rubrik
  • Research Articles
Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell 4.0 International.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Literaturhinweise
Aleson-Carbonell L, Fernandez-Lopez J, Perez-Alvarez J A, Kuri V. (2005) Characteristics of beef burger as influenced by various types of lemon albedo. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 6: 247-255.
Anderson ET, Berry, BW (2001) Effects of inner pea fiber on fat retention and cooking yield in high fat ground beef. Food Res. Int. 34:689–694.
AOAC. (2002) Offical methods of analysis (17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
Castro W F, Mariutti L R B, Bragagnolo N (2011) The Effect of calorific on lipid oxidation, colour and vitamin E in raw and grilled chicken patties during frozen storage. Food Chem 124: 126-131.
Cava R, Ladero L, Cantero, V, Ramirez, M R (2012) Assessment of different dietary fibers (tomato fiber, beet root fiber, and inulin) for the manufacture of chopped cooked chicken products. J Food Sci 77: 46-52.
Elleuch M, Bedigian D, Roiseux O, Besbes S. Blecker C (2011) Dietary fiber and fiber-rich by-products of food processing: Characterization, technological functionality and commercial applications: A review. Food Chem 124: 411-421.
Gokalp H Y, Kaya M, Tulek Y. Zorba O (1999) Laboratory application guide and quality control in meat and meat products (In Turkish). Atatürk Üniv Zir Fak, Yay No: 318, Turkey.
Hunt M C, Acton J C, Benedict R C, Calkins C R, Cornforth D P, Jeremiah L E, Olson D G, Salm C P, Savell J W, Shivas S D (1991) AMSA guidelines for meat color evaluation. Proceedings 44th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference, pp. 3‒17, 9‒12 July 1991, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Ibrahim M A, Salama M F, Hussein A A (2011) Production of low-fat chicken burger. Aust J Bas and Apl Sci 5: 3149-3154.
Khalil A H (2000) Quality characteristics of low-fat beef patties formulated with modified corn starch and water. Food Chem 68: 61-68.
Kilincceker O (2017) Some quality characteristics of chicken meatballs formulated with different dietary fibers. J Food Safety Food Qual 68:126-146.
Kılınççeker O, Kurt Ş (2018) Effects of inulin, carrot and cellulose fibres on the properties of raw and fried chicken meatballs. S Afr J Anim Sci 48: 39-47.
Mc-Carthy T L, Kerry J P, Kerry J F, Lynch P B, Buckley D J (2001) Assessment of antioxidant potential of natural food and plant extracts in fresh and previously frozen pork patties. Meat Sci 57: 177-184.
Murphy E W, Criner P E, Grey B C (1975) Comparison of methods for calculating retentions of nutrients in cooked foods. J Agric Food Chem 23: 1153–1157.
Petracci M, Bianchi M, Mudalal S, Cavani C (2013) Functional ingredients for poultry meat products. Tren Food Sci and Tech 33: 27-39.
Pinero M P, Parra K, Huerta-Leidenz N, Moreno L A., Ferrer M, Araujo S, Barboza Y (2008) Effect of oat’s soluble (β-glucan) as a fat replacer ob physical, chemical, microbiological and sensory properties of lowfat beef patties. Meat Sci 80: 675-680.
Sanchez-Zapata E, Munoz C M, Fuentes E, Fernandez-Lopez J, Sendra E, Sayas E, Navarro C (2010) Effect of tiger nut fiber on quality characteristics of pork burger. Meat Sci 85: 70-76.
Sarıçoban C, Yılmaz M T, Karakaya M, Tiske S S (2010) The effect of different levels of sunflower head pith addition on the properties of model system emulsions prepared from fresh and frozen beef. Meat Sci 84: 186–195.
Schormüller J (1969) Handbuch der lebensmittelchemie, band IV. Undlipoide (LIPIDS). Springer, Berlin/New York.
Soltanizadeh N, Ghiasi-Esfahani H (2015) Qualitative improvement of low meat beef burger using Aloe vera. Meat Sci 99: 75-80.
Sosulski F W, Cadden AM (1982) Composition and physiological properties of several sources of dietary fiber. J Food Sci 47: 1472–1477.
Talukder S, Sharma D P (2010) Development of dietary fiber rich chicken meat patties using wheat and oat bran. J Food Sci and Tech 47: 224-229.
Tarladgis B G, Watts B M, Younathan M T (1960) A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. J Am Oil Chem 37: 44–48.
Tabarestani H S, Tehrani M M (2014) Optimization of physicochemical properties of low-fat hamburger formulation using blend of soy flour, split-pea flour and wheat starch as part of fat replacer system. J Food Proc Pre 38: 278-288.
Tekin H, Saricoban C, Yilmaz, M T (2010). Fat, wheat bran and salt effects on cooking properties of meat patties studied by response surface methodology. Int J Food Sci Tech 45: 1980-1992.
Zayas J F (1997) Functionality of Proteins in Foods. Springer-Verlag, New York.