Nutritional evaluation of the agro-industrial by-products and waste fruits-vegetable for sustainable ruminant nutrition

PDF (English)
Veröffentlicht: Apr 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.25386
Hayrullah Bora ÜNLÜ
Ege University Agriculture Faculty Animal Science Department
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8897-9695
Figen KIRKPINAR
Ege University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2018-755X
Mürsel OZDOGAN
Adnan Menderes University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-9155
Abstract

The growing consumption of ruminant animal products gives rise to a huge demand of animal feed in growing countries. By-product feeds, waste fruits-vegetables, and crop residues should be considered as a valuable alternative feed resource in ruminant nutrition. This waste can be reutilized and converted by ruminants to valuable products for human benefits as a new resource and in return to increase the effectiveness of limited feed sources. But, there are limited new information and research regarding the nutritive value of this waste for ruminants. For this purpose, the experiment was conducted to evaluate the nutritional potential of some agro-industrial by-products, waste fruits-vegetable, and crop residue for ruminants specifically. Fourteen by-products, waste fruits-vegetable and crop residue were collected from the west part regions of Turkey. Nine by-product feeds (whole cottonseed, rice bran, soybean hull, apple pomade, citrus pulp, grape pomade, tomato pomade, grape stalk, rice hull), three waste fruits (dry grape, dry fig, carrot), one waste vegetable (potato) and also one crop residue (cornstalk) were analyzed for nutritional composition and metabolizable energy values were calculated by crude nutrients for ruminants. Further, energy, DMD, and OMD of these samples were investigated by using the cellulose enzyme method. All samples were analyzed the macro minerals (Ca, P, Na, K, and Mg) and the microelements (Fe, Cu, Mn, and Zn) contents. In the research, all samples regarding the parameters in DM, ash, OM, CP, EE, CF, NFE, NSC, NDF, ADF, starch, sugar,  Ca, P, Na, K, Mg, Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, DMD, OMD, MECN, and MECEL were different (P<0.05). The study showed that the waste fruits, vegetable, and by-products have valuable sugar (grape, fig, and carrot), starch (potato, rice bran), NSC (citrus pulp), and oil (cottonseed) content that is the main compounds making them high energetic feeds for ruminants. Also, most of these research materials have enough or much more macro and micro mineral concentrations for ruminant nutrition.

Article Details
  • Rubrik
  • Research Articles
Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell 4.0 International.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Autor/innen-Biografien
Hayrullah Bora ÜNLÜ, Ege University Agriculture Faculty Animal Science Department
Animal Nutrition and Feeds 
Figen KIRKPINAR, Ege University
Animal Science Department
Mürsel OZDOGAN, Adnan Menderes University
Animal Science Department
Literaturhinweise
Aghsaghali AM, Sis NM (2008) A review: nutritive value of some agro-industrial by-products for ruminants. World Journal of Zoology 3(2):40-46.
Agus A (2015) Ruminant nutrition: the role of agricultural by products in beef cattle production. Proceeding international seminar, “Improving tropical animal production for food security”. November 3-5 2015: Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Ajila CM, Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi RD, Godbout S, Valéro JR (2012) Bio-processing of agro-byproducts to animal feed. Crit Rev Biotechnol 32(4):1-20.
Allen MS (1996) Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forage by ruminants. J Anim Sci 74:3063–3075.
Anguloa J, Mahechaa L, Yepesa SA, Yepesa AM, Bustamantea G, Jaramillob H, Valenciab E, Villamilb T, Gallo J (2012) Nutritional evaluation of fruit and vegetable waste as feedstuff for diets of lactating Holstein cows. J Environmental Management 95:210-214.
AOAC (1990) Association of Official Analytical Chemist Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edn. Washington, DC (I):1234 p.
AOAC (1997) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official method of analysis.16th ed, Washington, DC, USA.
Arieli A (1998) Whole cottonseed in dairy cattle feeding: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 72(1-2):97-110.
Arosemena A, DePeters EJ, Fadel JG (1995) Extent of variability in nutrient composition within selected by-product feed stuffs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1995 Agu;54(1-4):103-120.
Azevêdo JAG, Valadares Filho SC, Pina DS, Detmann E, Pereira LGR, Valadares RFD, Fernandes HJ, Costa e Silva LF, Benedeti PB (2012) Nutritional diversity of agricultural and agro-industrial by-products for ruminant feeding. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 64(5):1246-1255.
Bach A, Yoon IK, Stern MD (1999) Effects of type of carbohydrate supplementation to lush pasture on microbial fermentation in continuous culture. J Dairy Sci. 82:153-160.
Belyea RL, Steevens BJ, Restrepo RJ, Clubb AP (1989) Variation in composition of by-product feeds. J Dairy Sci 72(9):2339-2345.
Bernard JK. Using by-product feeds (2010) The University of Georgia and Ft. Valley State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. Cooperative Extension 12 p.
Broderick GA, Luchini ND, Reynal SM, Varga GA, Ishler VA (2008) Effect on production of replacing dietary starch with sucrose in lactating dairy cows1. J Dairy Sci 9:4801-4810.
De Boever JL, Cottyn BG, Buysse FX, Wainman FW, Vanacker JM (1986) The use of an enzymatic technique to predict digestibility, metabolizable energy of compound feedstuffs for ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 14:203-214.
Dou Z. Ferguson JD, Galligan DT, Kelly AK, Finn SM, Giegengack R (2016) Assessing U.S. food wastage and opportunities for reduction. Global Food Security 8:19-26.
Eliyahu D, Yosef E, Weinbergd ZG, Hen Y, Nikbachat M, Solomon R, Mabjeesh SJ, Miron J (2015) Composition, preservation and digestibility by sheep of wet by-products from the food industry. Anim Feed Sci Technol 207:1-9.
FAO. World livestock-livestock in food security (2011) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italiy 91 p.
Filleau AHB, Rinne M, Lamminen M, Mapato C, Ampapon T, Wanapat M, Vanhatalo A Review: Alternative and novel feeds for ruminants: nutritive value, product quality and environmental aspects. Animal. 2018 Dec;(12):295-309.
Godfray HC, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812-818.
Gupta R, Chauhau TR, Lall D(1993) Nutritional potential of vegetable waste products for ruminants. Bioresour Technol 44:263-265.
INRA (2004) Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials:pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. P.O. Box 882, NL. 1180 AW, Amstelveen, The Netherlands: 303 p.
Kabak B, Dobson AD, Var I (2006) Strategies to prevent mycotoxin contamination of food and animal feed: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 46:593-619.
Kajikawa H (1995) Utilization of by-products from food processing as livestock feed in Japan. Department of Animal Nutrition National Institute of Animal Industry, Tsukuba 305, Japan : 8 p.
Lardy G, Anderson V (2009) Alternative feeds for ruminants. North Dakota State University Extension Service, Fargo, North Dakota. 58108: 24 p.
Liu Y, Jha R, Stein HH (2018) Nutritional composition, gross energy concentration, and in vitro digestibility of dry matter in 46 sources of bakery meals. J Ani Sci 96 :4685-4692.
Macgregor CA(2000) Directory of feeds &feed ingredients, Hoards and Sons Company,28 Milwaukee Avenue West, Fort Atkinson WI 53538 USA: 95 p.
McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA, Wilkinson RG (2012) Animal nutrition.7th ed. Essex (England): Pearson Education. Ltd: 692 p.
Nelson ML, Busboom JR, Cronrath JD, Falen L, Blankenbaker A (2000) Effects of graded levels of potato by-products in barley- and corn-based beef feedlot diets: I. Feedlot performance, carcass traits, meat composition, and appearance. J Anim Sci 78:1829-836.
Nicolini L, Volpe C, Pezzotti A, Carilli A (1993) Changes in in-vitro digestibility of orange peels and distillery grape stalks after solid-state fermentation by higher fungi. Biores Technol 45:17-20.
NRC (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. National Academic Press, Washington, D.C: 381 p.
NRC (1985) Nutrient requirements of sheep. National Acadmey of Science, 6 th revised. Washington, DC,USA: 244 p.
Oba M (2011) Effects of feeding sugars on productivity of lactating dairy cows. Can J Anim Sci 91:37-46.
Oltjen JW, Beckett JL (1996) Role of ruminant livestock in sustainable agricultural systems. J Anim Sci 74:1406–1409.
Soni N, Mehta S, Satpathy G, Gupta RK (2014) Estimation of nutritional, phytochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of dried fig (Ficus carica). J Pharma Phytochemist 3(2):158-165.
SPSS (2016) SPSS for Windows advanced statistics release. IBM, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tilley JMA, Terry RA (1963) A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 8:104-111.
Tretola M, Di Rosa A, Tirloni E, Ottoboni M, Giromini C, Leone F, Bernardi CEM, Dell’Orto V, Chiofalo V, Pinotti L (2017) Former food products safety: microbiological quality and computer vision evaluation of packaging remnants contamination. Food Additives and Contaminant Part A 34:1427-1435.
TSI (1991) Animal feeds determination of metabolizable energy (chemical method). Turkish Standards Institute. Publication No: 9610: 1-3 p.
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583-3597.
Varga GA, Dann HM, Ishler VA (1998) The use of fiber concentrations for ration formulation. J Dairy Sci 81(11):3063–3074.
Wadhwa M, Bakshi MPS, Makkar HPS (2015) Waste to worth: fruit wastes and by-products as animal feed. Perspectives in Agriculture Veterinary Science Nutrition and Natural Resources 2015: 26 p.
Wadhwa M, Bakshi MPS (2013) Utilization of fruit and vegetable wastes as livestock feed and as substrates for generation of other value-added products. FAO, Rome: 67 p.
Weiss WP (1993) Predicting energy values of feeds1. J Dairy Sci 76(6):1802-1811.
Weissbach F, Kuhla S, Schmidt L, Henkels A (1999) Schätzung der verdaulichkeit und der umsetzbaren energie von gras und grasprodukten. Proceedings of the Society of Nutrition Physiology 8:72 p.
White TW, Hembry FG (1985) Rice by-products in ruminant rations. LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports:18 p.