Effects of Calcium, Available Phosphorus and Microbial Phytase on Ovarian FSHR and LHR Expression in Laying Hens Microbial phytase effect on FSHR and LHR

PDF (English)
Δημοσιευμένα: Oct 18, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.30903
S Guler
Department of Histology&Embriology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7367-6859
ED Asmaz
Department of Histology&Embriology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey
A Saricetin
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
SS Cengiz
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
F Odabasi Erbay
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
E Demirkan
Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
Περίληψη

Folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis, ovulation, and vitellogenesis are regulated by the effect of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) in the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis and these hormones act via follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) in the ovary. Poultry ration and food additives are essential in the regulation of reproductive activity. Phytase is a supplement frequently added to laying hen diets to increase phosphorus (P) utilization. The aim of this study was to reveal the effects of a newly isolated microbial phytase together with different concentrations of calcium (Ca2+) and available phosphorus (AP) on ovarian FSHR and LHR expressions. For this purpose, 90 Lohmann LSL-White layers were first divided into three main diet groups (standard Ca2+ and AP, standard Ca2+ and low AP, low Ca2+ and AP) and then into three subgroups (no-phytase, commercial phytase, and microbial phytase). At the end of the experiment, all chickens were slaughtered and ovarian tissues were fixed in formalin. Routine avidin-biotin complex immunohistochemistry was performed using anti-FSHR and anti-LHR primary antibodies. Immunohistochemically, FSHR and LHR were expressed in granulosa/theca cells, oocytes, interstitial cells, and vitellus. While the expression intensity of the receptors increased in the microbial phytase-treated groups, the strongest expression was obtained in the granulosa/theca cells and oocytes in the standard Ca and low AP group. In conclusion, we suggest that the addition of newly isolated microbial phytase to diets of laying hens and feeding standard Ca and low AP may have positive effects on reproductive performance by increasing the FSHR and LHR expression in ovaries.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το CC Αναφορά Δημιουργού – Μη Εμπορική Χρήση 4.0.

Οι συγγραφείς των άρθρων που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατηρούν τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας επί των άρθρων τους, δίνοντας στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης.

Άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατίθενται με άδεια Creative Commons 4.0 Non Commercial και σύμφωνα με την άδεια μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται ελεύθερα, με αναφορά στο/στη συγγραφέα και στην πρώτη δημοσίευση για μη κερδοσκοπικούς σκοπούς.

Οι συγγραφείς μπορούν να καταθέσουν το άρθρο σε ιδρυματικό ή άλλο αποθετήριο ή/και να το δημοσιεύσουν σε άλλη έκδοση, με υποχρεωτική την αναφορά πρώτης δημοσίευσης στο J Hellenic Vet Med Soc

Οι συγγραφείς ενθαρρύνονται να καταθέσουν σε αποθετήριο ή να δημοσιεύσουν την εργασία τους στο διαδίκτυο πριν ή κατά τη διαδικασία υποβολής και αξιολόγησής της.

Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Abbasi F, Fakhur-un-Nisa T, Liu J, Luo X, Hussain I, Abbasi R (2019)
Low Digestibility of Phytate Phosphorus, Their Impacts on The En
vironment, and Phytase Opportunity in The Poultry Industry. Environ
Sci Pollut Res Int 26(10):9469-9479.
AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists) International. Of
f
icial Methods of Analysis. Arlington, VA, USA, Association of Offi
cial Analytical Chemists; 2000.
Bal MA, Shaver RD, Jirovec AG, Shinners KJ, Coors JG (2000) Crop
Processing and Chop Length of Corn Silage: Effects on Intake, Di
gestion, and Milk Production by Dairy Cows. J Dairy Sci 83(6):1264
Bello A, Dersjant-Li Y, Korver DR (2020) Effects of Dietary Calcium
and Available Phosphorus Levels and Phytase Supplementation on
Performance, Bone Mineral Density, and Serum Biochemical Bone
Markers in Aged White Egg-Laying Hens. Poult Sci 99(11):5792
Bougouin A, Appuhamy JADRN, Kebreab E, Dijkstra J, Kwakkel RP,
France J (2014) Effects of Phytase Supplementation on Phospho
rus Retention in Broilers and Layers: A Meta-analysis. Poult Sci
(8):1981-1992.
Burns KH, Yan C, Kumar TR, Matzuk MM (2001) Analysis of Ovarian
Gene Expression in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone β Knockout Mice.
Endocrinology 142(7): 2742-2751.
Chen H, Cui Y, Yu S (2018) Expression and Localisation of FSHR, GHR
and LHR in Different Tissues and Reproductive Organs of Female
Yaks. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 77(2):301-309.
Colin G. Scanes, Leasea D. Butler, Michael T. Kidd (2020) Chapter 20:
Reproductive Management of Poultry, (Eds. Bazer FW, Lamb GC,
Wu G), pp. 349-366. (Academic Press)
Gilbert AB, Peddie J, Mitchell GG, Teague PW (1981) The Egg-Laying
Response of The Domestic Hen to Variation in Dietary Calcium. Br
Poult Sci 22(6):537-548.
Gordon RW, Roland DA (1998) Influence of Supplemental Phytase on
Calcium and Phosphorus Utilization in Laying Hens. Poult Sci 77(2):
-294.
Grzegorzewska AK, Sechman A, Paczoska-Eliasiewicz HE, Rzasa J
(2009) The Expression of Pituitary FSHβ and LHβ mRNA and Go
nadal FSH and LH Receptor mRNA in the Chicken Embryo. Repro
ductive Biology 9(3):253-269.
Hu S, Zhu M, Wang J, Li L, He H, Hu B, Hu H, Xia L (2021) Histomor
phology and Gene Expression Profiles During Early Ovarian Follicu
logenesis in Duck and Goose. Poult Sci 100(2):1098-1108.
Igwe AO, Ihedioha JI, Okoye JOA (2018) Changes in Serum Calcium
and Phosphorus Levels and Their Relationship to Egg Production in
Laying Hens Infected with Velogenic Newcastle disease virus. J Appl
Anim Res 46(1):523-528.
Jalal MA, Scheideler SE (2001) Effect of Supplementation of Two Differ
ent Sources of Phytase on Egg Production Parameters in Laying Hens
and Nutrient Digestiblity. Poult Sci 80(10):1463-1471.
Jiang S, Cui L, Shi C, Ke X, Luo J, Hou J (2013) Effects of Dietary Energy
and Calcium Levels on Performance, Egg Shell Quality and Bone
Metabolism in Hens. Vet J 198(1):252-258.
Keshavarz K and Nakajima S (1993) Re-evaluation of Calcium and Phos
phorus Requirements of Laying Hens for Optimum Performance and
Eggshell Quality. Poult Sci 72 (1):144-153.
Lim HS, Namkung H, Paik IK (2003) Effects of Phytase Supplementation
on the Performance, Egg Quality, and Phosphorous Excretion of Lay
ing Hens Fed Different Levels of Dietary Calcium and Nonphytate
Phosphorous. Poult Sci 82(1):92-99.
Liu N, Liu GH, Li FD, Sands JS, Zhang S, Zheng AJ, Ru YJ (2007) Effica
cy of Phytases on Egg Production and Nutrient Digestibility in Layers
Fed Reduced Phosphorus Diets. Poult Sci 86(11):2337-2342.
Liu Z, Xue J, Luo Y, Wang Q, Zhong H, Liang M, Wang C (2019) Effects
of Dietary Energy Concentration on Reproductive Hormone Secre
tion and Gene Expression in the Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Gonad Axis
in Laying Geese. Braz J Poult Sci 21(03).
Méduri G, Charnaux N, Driancourt MA, Combettes L, Granet P, Vannier
B, Loosfelt H, Milgrom E (2002) Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Re
ceptors in Oocytes? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(5):2266-2276.
Mishra SK, Chen B, Zhu Q, Xu Z, Ning C, Yin H, Wang Y, Zhao X, Fan X,
Yang M, Yang M, Yang D, Qingyong N, Li Y, Zhang M, Li D (2020)
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Differentially Expressed Genes As
sociated with High Rates of Egg Production in Chicken Hypothalam
ic-Pituitary-Ovarian Axis. Sci Rep 10(1):1-8.
Nyuji M, Kitano H, Shimizu A, Lee JM, Kusakabe T, Yamaguchi A, Mat
suyama M (2013) Characterization, Localization, and Stage-Depen
dent Gene Expression of Gonadotropin Receptors in Chub Mackerel
(Scomber Japonicus) Ovarian Follicles. Biol Reprod 88(6):148.
Sahara E, Despedia F, Raden A (2018) The Influence of Phytase Enzyme
to Laying Performance and Quality of Egg Shell of Golden Arabian
Chicken. In ‘Proceedings of the 1st Sriwijaya International Confer
ence on Environmental Issues’. (Ed. Amin M) 68. 01022.
Saleh AA, Elsawee M, Soliman MM, Elkon RYN, Alzawqari MH, Shukry
M, Abdel-Moneim AME, Eltahan H (2021) Effect of Bacterial or
Fungal Phytase Supplementation on the Performance, Egg Quality,
Plasma Biochemical Parameters, and Reproductive Morphology of Laying Hens. Animals 11(2):540.
Shet D, Ghosh J, Ajith S, Awachat VB, Elangovan A V (2018) Effica
cy of Dietary Phytase Supplementation on Laying Performance and
Expression of Osteopontin and Calbindin Genes in Eggshell Gland.
Anim Nutr 4(1):52-58.
Tischler A, Halas V, Tossenberger J (2015) Effect of Dietary NPP Level
and Phytase Supplementation on the Laying Performance Over One
Year Period. Poljoprivreda 21(1):68-72.
Um JS, Paik (1999) Effects of Microbial Phytase Supplementation on Egg
Production, Eggshell Quality, and Mineral Retention of Laying Hens
Fed Different Levels of Phosphorus. Poult Sci 78(1):75-79.
Wan B, Yuan X, Yang W, Jiao N, Li Y, Liu F, Liu M, Yang Z, Huang L, Ji
ang S (2021) The Effects of Zearalenone on the Localization and Ex
pression of Reproductive Hormones in the Ovaries of Weaned Gilts.
Toxins (Basel) 13(9):1-14.
Ziaei N, Shivazad M, Mirhadi SA, Gerami A. (2009) Effects of Reduced
Calcium and Phosphorous Diets Supplemented with Phytase on Lay
ing Performance of Hens. Pak Jof Biol Sci 12:792-797.
Zyła K, Mika M, Duliński R, Światkiewicz S, Koreleski J, Pustkowiak
H, Piironen J (2012) Effects of Inositol, Inositol-Generating Phytase
B Applied Alone, and in Combination with 6-Phytase A to Phospho
rus-Deficient Diets on Laying Performance, Eggshell Quality, Yolk
Cholesterol, and Fatty Acid Deposition in Laying Hens. Poult Sci
(8):1915-1927.
Τα περισσότερο διαβασμένα άρθρα του ίδιου συγγραφέα(s)