Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Salmonella Dublin presence in Algerian dairy farms

PDF (English)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.28488
D HEZIL
Research Laboratory Management of Local Animal Resources, Higher National Veterinary School, El Alia, Oued Smar, Algiers, Algeria
N BENAMROUCHE
Laboratory of Enterobacteria and other related bacteria, Institute Pasteur of Algeria
S TENNAH
Research Laboratory Management of Local Animal Resources, Higher National Veterinary School, El Alia, Oued Smar, Algiers, Algeria
H BENSEGHIR
Research Laboratory Management of Local Animal Resources, Higher National Veterinary School, El Alia, Oued Smar, Algiers, Algeria
N ZAATOUT
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, University of Bejaia, Bejaia, Algeria
S ZAIDI
Research Laboratory Management of Local Animal Resources, Higher National Veterinary School, El Alia, Oued Smar, Algiers, Algeria
R ZINEDDINE
Research Laboratory Management of Local Animal Resources, Higher National Veterinary School, El Alia, Oued Smar, Algiers, Algeria
DT BOUTABBA
Laboratory of Enterobacteria and other related bacteria, Institute Pasteur of Algeria
C BELKADER
Laboratory of Enterobacteria and other related bacteria, Institute Pasteur of Algeria
H CHADI
Research Laboratory Management of Local Animal Resources, Higher National Veterinary School, El Alia, Oued Smar, Algiers, Algeria
C BERNARD
Research Laboratory Management of Local Animal Resources, Higher National Veterinary School, El Alia, Oued Smar, Algiers, Algeria Sciensano laboratories, Brussels, Belgium
F GHALMI
Research Laboratory Management of Local Animal Resources, Higher National Veterinary School, El Alia, Oued Smar, Algiers, Algeria
Resumen

Salmonella Dublin is a causative agent of a gastrointestinal bacterial infection prevalent in many cattle herds worldwide. Hence, the goal of this research was to evaluate the prevalence of Salmonella Dublin carriage in fecal and milk samples from dairy cattle from Algeria, and to investigate potential risk factors associated with the presence of S. Dublin antibodies. A total of 307 cows from 39 farms were analyzed in this study. Bacteriological and immunological methods were used to isolate and detect S. Dublin antibodies in feces and cow’s milk. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method. Logistic regression was used to study risk factors associated with S. Dublin antibodies. The bacteriological results showed the absence of S. Dublin and a prevalence of 0.97 % (3/307) (IC 95% 0 - 2.08)for S. Mbandaka. The immunological analysis of milk by the ELISA technique showed a prevalence of 36.33% (95% CI 30.44 - 42.22) for S. Dublin. Final multivariate regression models showed that the breed, the region and introduction of purchased cattle were associated with the presence of S. Dublin antibodies. This study is the first that reports the seroprevalence and risk factors associated with S. Dublin infection in Algeria and could be considered as a comparison point for further studies in Algeria.

Article Details
  • Sección
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Adesiyun AA, Webb LA, Romain, H and Kaminjolo, JS (1996) Prevalence of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter spp., Yersinia enterocolitica and Cryptosporidium spp. in bulk milk, cows’ faeces and effluents of dairy farms in Trinidad. Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop 49: 303-309.
AFNOR, NF U47-100 (2007). Standard Methods of analysis in animal health - Search by isolation and identification of any specified serovar or serovar (s) of Salmonella in the environment of animal production, Paris.
Agren EC, Johansson J, Frössling J, Wahlström H, Emanuelson U (2015) Sternberg-Lewerin S. Factors affecting costs for on-farm control of Salmonella in Swedish dairy herds Acta Vet Scand 57: 28.
Ayachi A, Bennoune O, Benterki MS, Heleili N (2012) Dry Gangrene of the Extremities Associated with Salmonella Dublin infection in a Calf. World Applied Sciences Journal 17 : 856-859.
Callaway TR, Keen JE, Edrington TS, Baumgard LH, Spicer L, Fonda ES, Griswold KE, Overton TR, Van Amburgh ME, Anderson RC, Genovese KJ, Poole TL, Harvey RB , Nisbet DJ (2005) Fecal prevalence and diversity of Salmonella species in lactating dairy cattle in four states. J Dairy Sci 88: 3603-8.
Camart-Périé A, Nemann Y , Dufour B (2007)Salmonelloses bovines: actualités - bovine salmonellosis: state of the art. Point Veterinaire 274: 32-37.
Cannon RM, Roe RT (1982) Livestock Diseases Surveys: A Field Manual for Veterinarians. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Animal health.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2018) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 28th informational. CLSI document supplement M100, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Cummings KJ, WarnickLD, Elton M, Gröhn YT, McDonough PL, Siler JD(2010) The Effect of clinical outbreaks of salmonellosis on the prevalence of fecal Salmonella shedding among dairy cattle in New York. Food borne Pathog Dis 7:815-823.
Davison HC, Sayers AR, Smith RP, Pascoe SJ, Davies RH, Weaver JP, Evans SJ (2006) Risk factors associated with the Salmonella status of dairy farms in England and Wales. Vet Record 159: 871-880.
De Marchi M, Dal Zotto R, Cassandro, Bittante G (2007) Milk coagulation ability of five dairy cattle breeds. J Dairy Sci 90: 3986- 3992.
Derdour SY, Hafsi F, Azzag N, Tennah S, Laamari A, China B, Ghalmi F (2017) Prevalence of the main infectious causes of abortion in dairy cattle in Algeria J Vet Res 61:337-343.
Doherty E, Sayers RO, Grady L(2013) Temporal trends in bulk milk antibodies to Salmonella, Neosporacaninum, and Leptospirainterrogansserovarhardjo in Irish dairy herds. Prev Vet Med 109: 343-348.
Eguale T, Engidawork E, Gebreyes WA, Asrat D, Alemayehu H, Medhin G, Johnson RP, Gunn JS (2016) Fecal prevalence, serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in dairy cattle in central Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol 16: 20.
Fossler CP, Wells SJ, Kaneene JB, Ruegg PL, Warnick LD, Bender JB, Eberly LE Godden SM and Halbert LW (2005) Herd-level factors associated with isolation of Salmonella in a multi-state study of conventional and organic dairy farms I. Salmonella shedding in cows. Prev Vet Me 70: 257-277.
Grimont PAD, Weill FX (2007) Short textbook of antigenic formulas of the Salmonella serovars. 9 rd Ed: WHO collaborating centre for reference and research on Salmonella, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15,France.
Hadimli HH, Pinarkara Y, Sakmanoğlu A, Sayin Z, Erganiş O, Uslu A , Al-Shattrawi HJ (2017) Serotypes of Salmonella isolated from feces of cattle, buffalo, and camel and sensitivities to antibiotics in Turkey. Turk J Vet AnimSci 41:193-198.
Halimi HA, Seifi HA, Rad M (2014) Bovine salmonellosis in Northeast of Iran: Frequency, genetic fingerprinting and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella spp. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 4:1-7.
Henderson K, Mason C (2017) Diagnosis and control of Salmonella Dublin in dairy herds. In Practice, 39(4): 158-168.
Holschbach, CL and Peek, SF (2018). Salmonella in dairy cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food AnimPract.; 34(1):133-154.
House JK, Smith BP, Dilling GW, Roden LD (1993) Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for serologic detection of Salmonella Dublin carriers on a large dairy. Am J Vet Res 54:1391-1399.
Kabagambe EK, Wells SJ, Garber LP, Salman MD, Wagner B, Fedorka-Cray PJ(2000) Risk factors for fecal shedding of Salmonella.PrevVet Med 43:177-94.
Mohamed ON, Farid AF, Abaza AF, Faltas RF (2011) Fecal Shedding of Non-typhoidalSalmonella Species in Dairy Cattle and their Attendants in Alexandria Suburbs. j am sci, 7: 623-631.
Molla B, Alemayehu D, Salah W (2003) Sources and distribution of Salmonella serotypes isolated from food animals, slaughterhouse personnel and retail meat product in Ethiopia: 1997-2002. Ethiop. J. Health. Dev 17: 63-70.
Nielsen LR, ErsbøllAK (2005) Factors associated with variation in bulktank-milk SalmonellaDublin ELISA ODC% in dairy herds. Prev Vet Med 68:165-79.
Nielsen LR (2009) Overview of pathogenesis, epidemiology and diagnostic tools necessary for successful surveillance and eradication of Salmonella Dublin from the Danish cattle population. “prize assignment “Professor Dr.med.h.c. C.O. Jensens Mindefond”. Department of Large Animal Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences University of Copenhagen Grønegådsvej 8, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Nielsen LR (2013)Salmonella Dublin faecal excretion probabilities in cattle with different temporal antibody profiles in 14 endemically infected dairy herds. Epidemiol Infect 141:1937-1944.
Nielsen LR, SchukkenYH, GröhnYT ,Ersbøll AK (2004) Salmonella Dublin infection in dairy cattle: risk factors for becoming a carrier. Prev Vet Med 65:47-62.
Nielsen NR , Dohoo I (2012) Survival analysis of factors affecting incidence risk of Salmonella Dublin in Danish dairy herds during a 7-year surveillance period. Prev Vet Med 107: 160-169.
Nyman J, Agren AK, ECC, Bergström K, Wahlström H (2013) “Evaluation of the specificity of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of antibodies against Salmonella in bovine bulk milk”. ActaVeterinariaScandinavica: 1-7.
Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD (2007) Veterinary Medicine. A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. 10rd Ed, Saunders, USA: pp 2065.
Richardson A (1973) Serological responses of Salmonella Dublin carrier cows. Br Vet J 129: liii-lv.
Richardson A, Watson WA (1971) A contribution to the epidemiology of Salmonella Dublin infection in cattle. Br Vet J : 173-183.
Rodriguez-Rivera LD, Wright EM, Siler JD, Elton M, Cummings KJ, Warnick LD (2014) Subtype analysis of Salmonella isolated from subclinically infected dairy cattle and dairy farm environments reveals the presence of both human-and-bovine associated subtypes. Vet Microbiol 170: 307-316.
Ruzante JM, Lombard JE, Wagner B, Fossler, CP, Karns JS, Van Kessel JAS , Gardner I A (2010). Factors Associated with Salmonella Presence in Environmental Samples and Bulk Tank Milk from US Dairies. Zoonoses Public Health 57: e217-25.
Thrusfield, M (2007) Veterinary Epidemiology. (3rdedn), Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK.
Smith BP, Oliver DG, Singh P, Dilling G, Martin PA, Ram BP, Jang LS, Sharkov N, Orsborn JS (1989) Detection of Salmonella Dublin mammary gland infection in carrier cows, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody in milk or serum. Am J Vet Res 50:1352-1360.
Smith KE, Stenzel SA, Bender JB, Wagstrom E, Soderlund D, Leano FT Taylor CM, Belle-Isle PA , Danila R (2004) Outbreaks of enteric infections caused by multiple pathogens associated with calves at a farm day camp. Pediatr Infect Dis J 23:1098-1104.
Van Schaik G, Schukken YH, Nielen M, Dijkhuizen AA, Barkema HW, Benedictus G (2002)Probability of and risk factors for introduction of infectious diseases into Dutch SPF dairy farms: a cohort study. Prev Vet Med: 279-289.
Veling J, Barkema HW, Van der Schans J, Van Zijderveld F, Verhoeff J (2002). Herd-level diagnosis for Salmonella enterica subsp. EntericaSerovar Dublin infection in bovine dairy herds. Prev Vet Med 53:31-42.
Visser SC, Veling J, Dijkhuizen AA, Huirne RBM(1997) Economic losses due to Salmonella Dublin in dairy cattle. In: Proceedings of the Dutch/Danish Symposium on Animal Health and Management Economics, Copenhagen, Dina Notat: pp143-151.
Visser IJ (1998) Pustular dermatitis in veterinarians following delivery in farm animals; an occupational disease. Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd. 123:114-117.
Warnick LD, Kaneene JB, Ruegg PL, Wells SJFossler C, Halbert L, Campbell A (2003) Evaluation of herd sampling for Salmonella isolation on midwest and northeast US dairy farms. Prev Vet Med 60:195-206.
Wells SJ, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Dargatz DA, FerrisK , Green A (2001) Fecalshedding of Salmonellassp. Bydairycows on farm and at cullcowmarkets. J Food Prot 64:3-11.
Yao KR, Coulibaly KJ, Cissé S, Tiécoura KB, Goualié GB, Gueu, KR, YapiF, Djaman, AJ (2017) Prevalence of Salmonella Strains in Cattle Breeding in the District of Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire). IntOf Current Micro and App Sci6: 1154-1162.