Effects of Housing Locations on Feather Damages of Laying Hens in a Free-Range Housing System

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.25931
Keywords:
Free range housing location plumage quality
METIN PETEK
Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Science Bursa Turkey
Abstract

This study was made to evaluate the effects of different locations of a free range housing system on feather damages of laying hens. The experimental house consisted of three different locations as closed indoor plastic slats, closed indoor litter and outdoor range area. The birds were able to move freely between the locations of the experimental house and they had continuous access to outdoor range during the day. The feather damages of the birds was evaluated with a distance scoring system at 64 weeks of age. Five area in each location of the experimental house were determined at first and then feather damages of five body parts of ten birds in each location were scored to measure plumage quality. Total feather score was defined as the sum of the scores of five body parts of the birds. Best plumage quality was measured in neck in all housing locations (P<0.01, P<0.05 and P<0.01) and total feather score of the birds was significantly greatest (worst) in slats (P<0.05).

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bestman MWP, Wagenaar JP (2003) Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens. Liv Prod Sci 80: 133-140.
Blokhuis HJ, Arkes JG (1984) Some observations on the develomnet of feather pecking in poultry. Apply Anim Behav 12: 145-157.
Bright A, Jones TA, Dawkins MS (2006) A non-intrusive method of assessing plumage condition in commercial flocks of laying hens. Anim Welfare 15: 113–118.
Campbell DLM, Hinch GN, Downing CA, Lee C (2016) Fear and coping styles of outdoor-preferring, moderate-outdoor and indoor-preferring free-range laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci 185: 73–77.
Campbell DLM, Hinch GN, Downing CA, LEE C (2018) Early enrichment in free-range laying hens: effects on ranging behaviour, welfare and response to stressors. Animal 12: 575–584.
Casey-Trott TM, Guerin MT, Sandilands V, Torrey S, Widowski TM (2017) Rearing system affects prevalence of keel-bone damage in laying hens: a longitudinal study of four consecutive flocks. Poultry Science 96: 2029-2039.
Casey-Trott T, Heerkens JLT, Petrik M, Regmi P, Schrader L, Toscano MJ, Widowski T (2015) Methods for assessment of keel bone damage in poultry. Poultry science, 94: 2339-2350.
Chielo LI, Pike T, Cooper J (2016) Ranging behaviour of Commercial Free-Range Laying Hens. Animals 6: 28.
Coton J, Guinebreitere M, Guesdon V, Chirn G, Mindus C, Laravoire A, Pauthier A, Balaine L, Descamps M, Bignon L, Huneau A, Aalaun S, Michel V (2019) Feather pecking in laying hens housed in free-range or furnished-cage systems on French farms. Brit Poult Sci 29: 1-11.
Decina C, Berek O, Van Staaverem N, Baes CF, Harleander-Matauscheck A (2019) Development of a Scoring System to Assess Feather Damage in Canadian Laying Hen Flocks. Animals 9:436-
Defra Booklet (2005) A guide to the practical management of feather pecking & cannibalism in free range laying hens. Defra Publications. London UK.
Ellen ED, Van Der Sluis M, Siegford J, Guzhva O, Toscano M, Bennewitz J, Van Der Zande L, Van Der Eijik JA, De Haas EN, Norton T, Piette D, Tetens J, De Klerk B, VisserR B, Rodenburg TB (2019) Review of sensor technologies in animal breeding. Phenotyping behaviors of laying hens to select against feather pecking. Animals 9:108.
Featherwel Booklet (2013) Improving Feather Cover. A guide to reducing the risk of injurious pecking occurring in non-cage laying hens. FeatherWel Project, University of Bristol, UK.
Giesberg MF, Spindler BS, Kemper N (2017) Assesment of plumage and integument condition in dual-purpose breeds and conventional layers. Animals 7: 1-15.
Grafl B, Polster S, Sulejmanovic T, Pürrer B, Guggenberger B, Hess M (2017) Assessment of health and welfare of Austrian laying hens at slaughter demonstrates influence of husbandry system and season. British Poultry Science, 58: 209-215.
Grigor PN (1993) :Use of space by laying hens: social and environmental implications for free-range systems. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh, UK.
Gunnarson S, Oden K, Algers B, Svedberg J, Keeling L (1995) Poultry health and behavior in a tiered system for loose housed layers. Page 112 in: Report 35. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Hygiene, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hartcher KM, Hickey KA, Hemsworth PH, Cronin GM, Wilkonson SJ, Singh M (2016) Relationships between range access as monitored by radio frequency identification technology, fearfulness, and plumage damage in free-range laying hens. Animal 10: 847-853.
Janczak AM, Riber AM (2015) Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poult Sci 94: 1454-1469.
Jung L, Knierim U (2018) Are practice recommendations for the prevention of feather pecking in laying hens in non-cage systems in line with the results of experimental and epidemiological studies? Appl Anim Behav Sci 200: 1–12.
Kaukonen E, Valros A (2019) Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hen Flocks—Farmers’ Perspectives. Animals (Basel) 9:43.
Lambton SL, Knowles TG, Yorke C, Nicol CJ (2010) The risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci 123: 32–42.
Lampton SL, Nicol CJ, Friel M, Main DC, McKinstry JL, Sherwin CM, Walton J, Weeks C (2013) A bespoke management package can reduce levels of injurious pecking in loose-housed laying hen flocks. Vet Rec 172: 423–428.
Leenstra F, Maurer V, Bestman M, Van Sambeek F, Zeltner E, Reuvekamp B, Galea F, Van Niekerk T (2012) Performance of commercial laying hen genotypes on free range and organic farms in Switzerland, France and The Netherlands. Br Poult Sci 53:282–290.
Liebers CJ, Schwarzer A, Erhard M, Schmidt S, Louton H (2019) The influence of environmental enrichment and stocking density on the plumage and health conditions of laying hens. Poult Sci 98:2474-2488.
Mahboub HD, Muller J, Von Borell E (2004) Outdoor use, tonic immobility, heterophil/lymphocyte ratio and feather condition in free-range laying hens of different genotype. Br Poult Sci 45: 738–744.
NRC (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th rev. ed., National Research Council, Washington D.C., USA.
Oliveira JL, Xin H, Chai L,Millman ST (2019) Effects of litter floor access and inclusion of experienced hens in aviary housing on floor eggs, litter condition, air quality, and hen welfare. Poult Sci. 98: 1664–1677.
Petek M (2013) Can early access to the range area be a solution to reduce injurious pecking in layer chickens? Science in the Service of Animal Welfare: Priorities around the World. UFAW International Animal Welfare Science Symposium, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 4–5 July.
Petek M, McKinstry JL (2010) Reducing the Prevalence and Severity of Injurious Pecking in Laying Hens without Beak Trimming. Uludag Univ J Fac Vet Med 29:61-68.
Petek M, Çavuşoğlu E, Topal E (2015) :Effects of age at first access to range area on pecking behaviour and plumage quality of free-range layer chickens. Arch Anim Breed 58:85-91.
Petterson IC, Weeks CA, Nicol CJ (2017) Provision of a resource package reduces feather pecking and improves ranging distribution on free range layer farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 195: 60-66.
Ramadan S, Von Borel E (2008) Role of loose feathers on the development of feather pecking in laying hens. Bri Poult Sci 49: 250-256.
Schreiter R, Damme K, Von Borell E, Vogt I, Klunker M, Freick M (2019) Effects of litter and additional enrichment elements on the occurrence of feather pecking in pullets and laying hens - A focused review. Vet Med Sci 00: 1-8.
Sherwin CM, Richards GJ, Nicol CJ (2010) Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. Bri Poult Sci 51: 488-499.
Sherwin CM, Nasr MAF, Gale E, Petek M, Stafford K, Turp M, Coles GC (2013) Prevalence of nematode infection and faecal egg counts in free-range laying hens: relations to housing and husbandry. Br Poult Sci 54:12–23.
Shimmura T, Suzuki T, Hirahara S, Egucki Y, Uetake K, Tanaka E (2008) Pecking behaviour of laying hens in single-tiered aviaries with and without outdoor area. Br Poult Sci 49: 396-401.
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) :Statistical Methods. 8th ed., Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Spss (2004) SPSS 13.00 Computer Software, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
Temple D, Van Niekerk T, Wekkes C, Manteca X (2017) Guedliness feather pecking hennovation. EU Hennovation Project.
Weeks CA, Friel M, Lampton SL, Main DCJ, McKinstry JL, Petek M, Sherwin C, Thierstein J, Walton J, Nicol CJ (2011) Uptake of different types of intervention aimed at reducing injurious pecking on commercial free-range laying hen farms in the UK. in: Proceedings of the 30th Poultry Science Symposium. Alternative Systems for Poultry-Health, Welfare and Productivity, 7–9 September 2011, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, http://www.cabi.org/ uploads/animal-science/worlds-poultry-science-association/ WPSA-glasgow-scotland-2011/49_Weeks_2_poster.pdf (last access: 4 February 2015).