The Loop We Didn't Choose Human-AI Configurations and the Sustainability of Interpreting


Published: Mar 14, 2026
Keywords:
sustainability of interpreting artificial intelligence human-in-the-loop human-on-the-loop human-out-of-the-loop AI ethics professional identity interpreter training
Stefanos Vlachopoulos
Abstract

This special issue examines whether the interpreting profession can remain sustainable amid rapid advances in artificial intelligence. The papers in this issue provide empirical evidence, theoretical frameworks, and practical insights from diverse geographical contexts - Poland, Greece, Cyprus, Italy, Malta, Austria, Germany, and Japan - and across multiple interpreting modalities, including conference interpreting, community interpreting, speech-to-text interpreting, and broadcast interpreting. Together, they paint a complex picture of a profession at a critical crossroads. This introduction synthesizes the contributions through the conceptual lens of human-machine configurations - distinguishing between contexts where humans remain in the loop, where they operate on the loop in supervisory roles, and where they are being placed out of the loop illuminating not only the current state of AI interpreting but also the ethical conditions under which professional sustainability might be achieved.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Foreword
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Benedikt, L., Joshi, C., Nolan, L.A., Henstra Hill, R., Shaw, L. & Hook, S. (2020) ‘Human in the Loop AI in government: A case study’, in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 488–497. ACM.
European Language Council (2025) AI for Translation and Interpreting: A Roadmap for Users and Policy Makers. Peeters, K., Daems, J., Plieseis, C., Rivas Ginel, M.I. & Şahin, M. (eds).
Hau, D. (2025) Beyond the loop: Reclaiming pedagogy in an AI age. UNESCO. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/beyond-loop-reclaiming-pedagogy-ai-age (Accessed: 9 February 2026).
Hoffmann, C.H. & Bansal, D. (eds.) (2025) AI Ethics in Practice: Navigating Academic Insight, Managerial Expertise, and Philosophical Inquiry. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Holzinger, A. (2016) ‘Interactive machine learning for health informatics: When do we need the human in the loop?’, Brain Informatics, 3, pp. 119–131.
Htin, N.M. (2026) ‘Redefining the standard of human oversight for AI negligence’, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology.
Keller, L. (2025) ‘AI and language interpreting’, in Hoffmann, C.H. & Bansal, D. (eds.) AI Ethics in Practice: Navigating Academic Insight, Managerial Expertise, and Philosophical Inquiry. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 57–70.
Natarajan, S., Mathur, S., Sidheekh, S., Stammer, W. & Kersting, K. (2025) ‘Human in the loop or AI in the loop? Automate or collaborate?’, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39(27), pp. 28594–28600.
Tomlinson, K., Jaffe, S., Wang, W., Counts, S. & Suri, S. (2025) Working with AI: Measuring the Occupational Implications of Generative AI. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07935 (Accessed: 23 February 2025).
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2025) Beyond the Loop: Reclaiming Pedagogy in an AI Age. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/beyond-loop-reclaiming-pedagogy-ai-age (Accessed: 24 February 2025).
The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting, Technology and AI (2025). Taylor & Francis.
Most read articles by the same author(s)