Purposes for ICT usage and classroom activities in junior high schools: Evidence from teachers’ attitudes
Resumen
This paper investigated teachers’ attitudes-views regarding the purposes for ICT usage and classroom activities with ICT tools, in junior experimental high schools in Greece (students aged 12-15 years old). The participants were 56 teachers of different specializations and data were collected via an open-ended questionnaire. The major purposes reported include that these tools are attractive, they cause/increase students' interest and motivation, and the lessons become more enjoyable. Factors that affect when and how ICT will be used in classrooms mainly regard the time and resources availability and the number of students in class. A range of ICT tools-applications are used in different school subjects for the accomplishment of various learning activities such as information search, presentation of students’ work, discussions, communication, exercises and assessment. Implications include teacher professional development and elimination of obstacles for technology utilization (infrastructure, large number of students in class).
Article Details
- Cómo citar
-
- Sección
- Μέρος πρώτο / Section 1
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Οι συγγραφείς των άρθρων που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατηρούν τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας επί των άρθρων τους, δίνοντας στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης. Άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατίθενται με άδεια Creative Commons 4.0 και σύμφωνα με την άδεια μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται ελεύθερα, με αναφορά στο/στη συγγραφέα και στην πρώτη δημοσίευση για μη κερδοσκοπικούς σκοπούς και με δικαίωμα τροποποίησης μόνον με παρόμοια διανομή (αν αναμείξετε, τροποποιήσετε, ή δημιουργήσετε πάνω στο υλικό, πρέπει να διανείμετε τις δικές σας συνεισφορές υπό την ίδια άδεια όπως και το πρωτότυπο).Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Al‐Mamary, Y.H.S. (2022). Examining the factors affecting the use of ICT in teaching in Yemeni schools. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2330.
Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education, 121, 30-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.006.
BECTA (2003). What the research says about ICT and motivation. BECTA - ICT research. Coventry: UK.
Chen, M., Zhou, C., Meng, C., & Wu, D. (2019). How to promote Chinese primary and secondary school teachers to use ICT to develop high-quality teaching activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1593–1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09677-0.
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Edition). Boston: Pearson.
CTI (2016). In-service training of teachers in the utilization and application of digital technologies in the teaching practice (B-level ICT teacher training). https://e-pimorfosi.cti.gr/en/. Accessed June 2018.
Dinsmore, B. (2019). Contested affordances: teachers and students negotiating the classroom integration of mobile technology. Information, Communication & Society, 22(5), 664-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1568518.
Dwyer, C.P., Hogan, M.J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.
EEC (2018). Digital learning and ICT in education. https://ec.europa.eu/. Accessed June 2018.
Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551.
Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
European Commission (2019). 2nd Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Grimalt-Álvaro, C., Ametller, J., & Pintó, R. (2019). Factors Shaping the Uptake of ICT in Science Classrooms. A Study of a Large-Scale Introduction of Interactive Whiteboards and Computers. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(1), 18-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.27.01.002.
Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276961.
Hennessy, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., la Velle, L., McFarlane, A., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers & Education, 48(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.02.004.
Hsieh, W.M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Taiwanese high school teachers' conceptions of mobile learning. Computers & Education, 115, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.013.
Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2006). ICT in education: exploring the views of secondary school teachers. In D. Psillos & V. Dagdilelis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Panhellenic Conference ‘ICT in Education’ (pp. 829-836), ETPE, Thessaloniki. (in Greek)
Kafai, Y., Fishman, B., Bruckman, A., & Rockman, S. (2002). Models of educational computing @home: New frontiers for research on technology in learning. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 10(2), 52-68. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/10723/. Accessed November 2020.
Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1535-1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9398-0.
Kaouri, Z. (2017). Evaluating the use of ICT in education: Factors affecting teaching with technology. ICICTE Proceedings (pp. 449-462). http://www.icicte.org/ICICTE_2017_Proceedings/SSP3_Kaouri%202017.pdf. Accessed June 2020.
Kervin, L., & Mantei, J. (2009). Using computers to support children as authors: an examination of three cases. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390802704014.
Kim, H.J., & Kim, H. (2017). Investigating Teachers’ Pedagogical Experiences with Tablet Integration in Korean Rural Schools. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1–2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0331-8.
Konstantinidou, E., & Scherer, R. (2022). Teaching with technology: A large-scale, international, and multilevel study of the roles of teacher and school characteristics. Computers & Education, 179, 104424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104424
Kousloglou, M., & Syrpi, M. (2018). Perceptions of secondary school teachers on the use of handheld devices in schools, as learning tools. 5th PanHellenic Educational Conference of Central Macedonia "ICT use and integration in educational practice" (pp. 39-62), April 27-29, Thessaloniki. (in Greek)
Mystakidis, S., Filippousis, G., Tolis, D., & Tseregkouni, E. (2021). Playful Metaphors for Narrative-Driven E-Learning. Applied Sciences, 11, 11682. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411682
Nikolopoulou, K. (2018). Mobile learning usage and acceptance: perceptions of secondary school students. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(4), 499-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0127-8
Nikolopoulou, K. (2020). Secondary education teachers’ perceptions of mobile phone and tablet use in classrooms: benefits, constraints and concerns. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00156-7
Nikolopoulou, K. (2021). Mobile devices and mobile learning in Greek secondary education: Policy, empirical findings and implications. In A. Marcus-Quinn & T. Hourigan (Eds.) Handbook for Online Learning Contexts: Digital, Mobile and Open: Policy and Practice (chapter 6, pp. 67-80). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-67349-9_6
Nikolopoulou, K. Gialamas, V., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2021). “Teachers’ readiness to adopt mobile learning in classrooms: A study in Greece”. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(1), 53-77. DOI 10.1007/s10758-020-09453-7
Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2016). Barriers to ICT use in high schools: Greek teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0052-z
Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2017). High school pupils’ attitudes and self-efficacy of using mobile devices. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 10(2), 53-67. http://earthlab.uoi.gr/theste/index.php/theste/article/view/239
Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2018). Mobile phone dependence: secondary school pupils’ attitudes. Education and Information Technologies, 23(26), 2821-2839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9743-1
Nikolopoulou, K., & Kousloglou, M. (2019). Mobile learning in science: A study in secondary education in Greece. Creative Education, 10(6), 1271-1284. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.106096
Nikolopoulou, K., & Kousloglou, M. (2022). Online Teaching in Covid-19 Pandemic: Secondary School Teachers’ Beliefs on Teaching Presence and School Support. Education Sciences, 12(3), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030216
Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.013.
Powell, C.G., & Bodur, Y. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.004
Prieto-Rodriguez, E. (2016). “It Just Takes so Much Time!” A Study of Teachers’ Use of ICT to Convey Relevance of Mathematical Content. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 13-24. DOI: 10.1564/tme_v23.1.02.
Ross, S.M. (2020). Technology infusion in K-12 classrooms: a retrospective look at three decades of challenges and advancements in research and practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2003-2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09756-7
Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers' pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 449-460), vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_27.
Szyszka, M., Tomczyk, Ł., Kochanowicz, A.M. (2022). Digitalisation of Schools from the Perspective of Teachers’ Opinions and Experiences: The Frequency of ICT Use in Education, Attitudes towards New Media, and Support from Management. Sustainability, 14(14), 8339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148339
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029.
Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x.
Willis, R.L., Lynch, D., Fradale, P., & Yeigh, T. (2018). Influences on purposeful implementation of ICT into the classroom: An exploratory study of K-12 teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9760-0.
Yang, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Huang, M., & Ma, Y. (2021). A study of K-12 teachers’ TPACK on the technology acceptance of E-schoolbag. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1627560
