Computational Model of Intelligence


Published: Oct 15, 2020
Keywords:
Intelligence artificial neural networks
Σταύρος - Εμμανουήλ Πανούτσος
Abstract

The purpose of this very study is to highlight important issues underlying the concept of intelligence. Human intelligence has been a crucial topic of heated debate over the years and, as a result, the very nature and structure of intelligence still remain vague. This research addresses intelligence in terms of three aspects namely processing speed, speed of learning and the representational power required to solve complex intellectual tasks. Although all these have been suggested as candidate mechanisms of intelligence, the correlation between them as well as their impact on cognition is still unclear. To investigate this even further, an artificial neural network was developed in Matlab, in order to provide a mechanistic approach to intelligence. This artificial neural network was used to test out the hypothesis that certain parameter manipulations, such as altering the activation function, learning rate or the number of hidden units in the network, could be linked to the network’s processing speed, speed of learning and representational power. Results suggest that only modifications in
the learning rate produced such changes across the aforementioned three constructs. As a result, this parameter is suggested as a candidate mechanism that underlies an important portion of the neurocomputational basis of human intelligence. The implications are discussed.

Article Details
  • Section
  • RESEARCH PAPERS
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anderson, M. (1992). Intelligence and Development:
A Cognitive Theory. Wiley.
Catell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth
and action. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Cybenko, G. (1989). Approximation by Superpositions
of a Sigmoidal Function. Mathematics of
Control, Signals and Systems, 2, 303-314.
Dawson, M. R. W., Kelly, D. M., Spetch, M. L., &
Dupuis, B. (2010). Using perceptrons to explore
the reorientation task. Cognition, 114, 207-226.
Fausett, L. (1996). Fundamentals of Neural Networks:
Architectures, Algorithms and Applications. Prentice
Hall International.
Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences
for the 21st century. New York: Basic
Books.
Garlick, D. (2002). Understanding the nature of the
general factor of intelligence: The role of individual
differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory
mechanism. Psychological Review, 109, 116-
Halford, G. S. (1999). The development of intelligence
includes capacity to process relations of greater
complexity. In M. Anderson (Eds.) The development
of intelligence. Psychology Press.
Huttenlocher, P. R., & Dabhokar, A. S. (1997). Regional
Differences in Synaptogenesis in Human
Cerebral Cortex. The Journal of Comparative Neurology,
, 167-178.
Jensen, A., R. (1998). The g factor: The science of
mental ability. Westport: Praeger.
Mitchel, T. (1997). Machine Learning. McGraw Hill.
Phillips, S., Halford, G. S., & Wilson, W. H. (1995). The
processing of associations versus the processing
of relations and symbols: A systematic comparison.
In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 17th annual conference of the
Cognitive Science Society. Pittsburgh: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual
for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary
scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory
of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological
Review, 103, 403-428.
Shaw, P., Greenstein, D., Lerch, J., Clasen, L., Lenroot,
R., Gogtay, N., Evans, A., Rapoport, J.,&
Giedd, J. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical
development in children and adolescents. Nature,
, 676-679.
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London:
Macmillan.
Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., Bernstein,
M. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
, 37-55.
Thomas, M. S. C., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). Connectionist
models of development, developmental
disorders and individual differences. In R. J.
Sternberg, J. Lautrey, & T. Lubart (Eds.), Modells
of Intelligence: International Perspectives. American
Psychoogical Association.
Williams, B. A., & Pearlberg, S. L. (2006). Learning of
three-term contingencies correlates with Raven
scores, but not with measures of cognitive processing.
Intelligence, 34, 177-191.