Μεταρρύθμιση του Αναλυτικού Προγράμματος Φυσικών Επιστημών από τη σκοπιά των Εκπαιδευτικών

¨Έρευνα για την Εκπαίδευση στις Φυσικές Επιστήμες και την Τεχνολογία, Τόμος 4, Αρ. 1 (2024)
PDF
Δημοσιευμένα: Jul 17, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/riste.36904
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
αναλυτικό πρόγραμμα φυσικών επιστημών μεταρρύθμιση αναλυτικού προγράμματος προσανατολισμός αναλυτικού προγράμματος σκοπός εκπαιδευτικής μεταρρύθμισης
Πέτρος Παπαδάκης
Δευτεροβάθμια Εκπαίδευση
Δημήτρης Σταύρου
Πανεπιστήμιο Κρήτης
Περίληψη

Είναι πλέον ευρέως αποδεκτό πως η σύγκλιση ανάμεσα στο περιεχόμενο μιας εκπαιδευτικής μεταρρύθμισης και τις απόψεις των εκπαιδευτικών, αποτελεί παράγοντα που μπορεί να συμβάλει στην επιτυχία της. Αυτό συνεπάγεται πως η κατανόηση του τρόπου με τον οποίο οι εκπαιδευτικοί αντιλαμβάνονται το αναλυτικό πρόγραμμα και τις σχετικές με αυτό μεταρρυθμίσεις, αποτελεί καθοριστικό στοιχείο για κάθε προσπάθεια βελτίωσης της εκπαίδευσης. Σε αυτή την εργασία, διερευνούμε τις απόψεις των εκπαιδευτικών φυσικών επιστημών δευτεροβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης σε σχέση με τα βασικά χαρακτηριστικά που οφείλει να έχει μια μεταρρύθμιση του αναλυτικού προγράμματος αλλά και τους παράγοντες που διαμορφώνουν την άποψή τους σε σχέση με μια τέτοια μεταρρύθμιση. Το δείγμα αποτέλεσαν 152 εκπαιδευτικοί, οι οποίοι απάντησαν σε ερωτηματολόγιο που συντάξαμε για τις ανάγκες της παρούσας έρευνας.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρο Ερευνητικό

Οι συγγραφείς διατηρούν τα πνευματικά δικαιώματα και παρέχουν στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης μαζί με την αδειοδότηση της εργασίας με CC-BY-NC-SA, που επιτρέπει σε άλλους να μοιράζονται αυτή την εργασία με αναγνώριση του συγγραφικού δικαιώματος και την αρχική δημοσίευση σε αυτό το περιοδικό.

Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Καραπιστόλης, Δ. Ν. (2011). Πολυδιάστατη στατιστική ανάλυση. Θεσσαλονίκη: Αθανασίου Αλτιντζή. ISBN-13: 9789609465106.
Κατσής, Α., Σιδερίδης, Γ,. & Εμβαλωτής Α. (2010). Στατιστικές μέθοδοι στις κοινωνικές επιστήμες. Αθήνα: Τόπος. ISBN 9789606863806.
Aasen, P. (2012). Nothing Is As Political As Education. Honorary Doctors, 17. ISBN: 978-91-554-9935-8.
Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: computational statistics, 2(4), 433-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
Alshammari, A. S. (2014). A Socio-Cultural Investigation of Science Curriculum Reform and Implementation in Kuwait: Perspectives of Teachers, Students and Curriculum Reformers (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Exeter). Ανακτήθηκε στις 01/2/2024, από: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/15596
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
Bartholomew, D., Steele, F., Moustaki, I. & Galbraith, J. (2007). Ανάλυση πολυμεταβλητών δεδομένων για κοινωνικές επιστήμες (X. Αναστασιάδης, μτφρ.). Θεσσαλονίκη: Επίκεντρο. ISBN13: 9789606647949.
Bodegas, I. D. N. (2007). From curriculum to syllabus design: The different stages to design a programme. FONAEL, 275, 290. ISBN: 978-968-9308-13-3.
Cheung, D. (2000). Measuring teachers' meta-orientations to curriculum: Application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of experimental education, 68(2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598500
Cheung, D., & Ng, P. H. (2000). Science teachers' beliefs about curriculum design. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461556
Cheung, D., & Ng, P. H. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs about curriculum design: evidence of a superordinate curriculum meta-orientation construct. Curriculum and Teaching, 17(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/17.2.06
Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 23(2), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
Cohen, D. K., & Spillane, J. P. (1992). Chapter 1: Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of research in education, 18(1), 3-49. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X018001003
Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: The importance of teachers' beliefs. Journal of curriculum studies, 38(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038644
Cronin‐Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of research in science teaching, 28(3), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280305
Cuban, L. (1995). The hidden variable: How organizations influence teacher responses to secondary science curriculum reform. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543651
Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of science teacher education, 7(4), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058659
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Policy and change: Getting beyond bureaucracy. In International handbook of educational change (pp. 642-667). Springer, Dordrecht. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2F1-4020-4453-4_18
DeBoer, G. E. (2014). The history of science curriculum reform in the United States. Handbook of research on science education, 2, 759-578. eBook ISBN: 9780203097267.
Dreyfus, A. (1987). The Validation of Developers’ Assumptions about a Technology‐minded Biological Curriculum. Research in Science & Technological Education, 5(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514870050208
Ennis, C. D. (1994). Urban secondary teachers’ value orientations: Delineating curricular goals for social responsibility. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13(2), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.13.2.163
Fensham, P. J. (1988). Familiar but different: Some dilemmas and new directions in science education. Development and dilemmas in science education, 23, 1-26. eBook ISBN: 9780203064580.
Fensham, P. J. (1993). Academic influence on school science curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027930250103
Fensham, P. J. (2009). The link between policy and practice in science education: The role of research. Science Education, 93(6), 1076-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20349
Finley, F. N. (1983). Science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200105
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2004). Design‐based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20040
Fullan, M. (1993). Changing forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203059005
Gardner, P. L. (1995). The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosophical reflections. Part II. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763650
Gillham, B. (2008). Developing a questionnaire. A&C Black. ISBN: 9780826496317.
Good, R., & Berger, C. (1998). The computer as powerful tool for understanding science. Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view, 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012498360-1/50009-X
Goodson, I. F. (2001). Social histories of educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011508128957
Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics education research journal, 15(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217369
Hodson, D. (1987). Social control as a factor in science curriculum change. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5), 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090503
Hofstein, A., & Yager, R. E. (1982). Societal issues as organizers for science education in the ‘80s. School science and mathematics, 82(7), 539-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1982.tb10054.x
Javeau, C. (1996). Η έρευνα με ερωτηματολόγιο: το εγχειρίδιο του καλού ερευνητή. Αθήνα: Τυπωθήτω. ISBN: 960-7643-33-X.
Jenkins, S. B. (2009). Measuring teacher beliefs about curriculum orientations using the modified-curriculum orientations inventory. The Curriculum Journal, 20(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170902948798
Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice. Sage. ISBN: 9781847872753.
Levin, B. (2008). Curriculum policy and the politics of what should be learned in schools. The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976572
Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Key components of a curriculum plan: Objectives, content, and learning experiences. Schooling, 2(1), 1-4. Ανακτήθηκε στις 01/2/2024, από: http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lunenburg,%20Fred%20C.%20Components%20of%20a%20Curriculum%20Plan%20Schooling%20V2%20N1%202011.pdf
McNeil, J. D. (1985). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction. Little Brown. ISBN: 0673520218.
Meis Friedrichsen, P., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive‐level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers' science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20046
Moheno, P. B. (1993). Toward a fully human science education: An exploratory study of prospective teachers’ attitudes toward humanistic science education. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150108
Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2005). The student review of the science curriculum. School Science Review, 87(318), 83-93. Ανακτήθηκε στις 01/2/2024, από: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10024134/1/Reiss2005The83.pdf
Pedersen, J. E., & Totten, S. (2001). Beliefs of science teachers toward the teaching of science/technological/social issues: are we addressing national standards?. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 21(5), 376-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046760102100507
Peterson, R. A. (2000). Constructing effective questionnaires. Chronicle Books. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349022
Prawat, R. S. (1990). Changing Schools by Changing Teachers' Beliefs about Teaching and Learning. Elementary Subjects Series No. 19. Ανακτήθηκε στις 01/2/2024, από: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED322144.pdf
Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American educational research journal, 28(3), 559-586. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028003559
Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education. Development and dilemmas in science education, 27-54. eBook ISBN: 9780203064580.
Ryder, J. (2015). Being professional: accountability and authority in teachers’ responses to science curriculum reform. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 87-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.1001629
Ryder, J.(2017). The role of education policy in the experience of teaching: A sociocultural perspective. In: E, Nihlfors, (ed.) Honorary Doctors at the Faculty of Educational Sciences 2011-2017. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis . Uppsala University , pp. 167-179. ISBN: 978-91-554-9935-8.
Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2011). Multiple aims in the development of a major reform of the national curriculum for science in England. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 709-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.485282
Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2013). School teachers’ experiences of science curriculum reform. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 490-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.665195
Ryder, J, Banner, I., & Homer, MS. (2014). Teachers’ experiences of science curriculum reform. School Science Review, 95 (352). 126 - 130 (5). ISSN: 0036-6811.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
So, W.M., Tang, K.Y. & Ng, P.H. (2000), Understanding science teaching and learning in primary classrooms. In Y.C. Cheng, K.W. Chow & K.T. Tsui (Eds) School Curriculum Change and Development in Hong Kong (pp. 505-520). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education. ISBN: 9629490285.
Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202799183205
Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. In The educational forum (Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 143-150). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
Spillane, J. P., & Callahan, K. A. (2000). Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5%3C401::AID-TEA2%3E3.0.CO;2-D
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of educational research, 72(3), 387-431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
Stinner, A. (1995). Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79(5), 555-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790506
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum development: Theory into practice (p. 30). New York: Macmillan. ISBN: 0-13-086473-0.
Tanrıverdi, B., & Apak, Ö. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about curriculum orientations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 842-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.308
Thijs, A. & van den Akker, J. (2009). Curriculum in Development. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO. ISBN: 978 90 329 2328 0.
Van den Akker, J. (2004). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7_1
Mallick, K., & Verma, G. (2005). Researching education: Perspectives and techniques. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203980361
Wallace, C. S., & Priestley, M. (2011). Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio‐cultural perspective on professional development and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.563447
Watts, M., Alsop, S., Zylbersztajn, A., & Silva, S. M. D. (1997). ‘Event‐centred‐learning’: an approach to teaching science technology and societal issues in two countries. International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190306
Witz, K. G., & Lee, H. (2009). Science as an ideal: Teachers’ orientations to science and science education reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(3), 409-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270802165640