Learning Between Two Worlds: The known and the not-foreknow


Published: Jul 20, 2022
Keywords:
Learning
Aliki Nikolaides
Abstract



There is a fundamental assumption that I have held about the role adult learning plays in society. That the sinuous stuff between personal and societal transformation is made up of the connections that learning makes. This assumption has been shaken over the as the past two years, as ruptures of civil unrest and the cloud of the global Pandemic have revealed weaknesses in the power of learning that makes the vital connection between the personal and societal, transformative. I wonder more than ever how to reveal and make real the learning that connects the two worlds I feel we live in. The world that is known and that continues to be reproduced with all of its inequities and exclusions and the world not- foreknown that wants to be different, liberating the creative potential that learning unfolds.


In this writing I offer a personal experience of penetrating the underlying assumptions I have about learning in between two worlds. I practice a method that I have created, in-scending, a practice of staying close to undergoing experience (Nicolaides, Forthcoming; Yorks & Nicolaides, 2013), experiencing experience while experiencing experience would be another way to describe what Dewey (1934) meant. In-scend(ing) is a word of my own making. It is the felt sense of moving beneath experience to undergo it. A tool of generative knowing (Nicolaides, Forthcoming; Nicolaides, 2015).


I explore the arising of awareness that emerged through the practice of in-scending, beneath an inquiry about my relationship to being secure in these times of insecurity. Undergoing is a less known aspect of reflection from Dewey’s pragmatist philosophy of learning through experience. Dewey discusses a necessary aspect of learning from experience in terms of undergoing an experience (Nicolaides, & Lim, 2020). Undergoing describes the felt sense of experiencing an experience. Having an experience is necessary for learning, and most assuredly for transformative learning to take shape though the meaning-making process that includes reflection on experience, and going beneath the experience with head, heart, and body. In this short offering I reveal what I learn by inquiring beneath what it means for me to be secure in times of insecurity. I do so by reviving Dewey’s (1934) concept of undergoing experience while also risking the conventional epistemologies that undergird transformative learning to consider a way of knowing that begin beneath experience (Nicolaides, 2015).




Article Details
  • Section
  • Forum
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.
Nicolaides, A. (Forthcoming). Generative knowing: A nomadic adult Learning theory. Myers Press.
Nicolaides, A. (2015). Generative learning: Adults learning within ambiguity. Adult Education Quarterly, 65(3), 179-195. doi:10.1177/0741713614568887
Nicolaides, A., & Lim, A. (2020). Undergoing the experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic as ruptures in American civil society create conditions for right action. Reflective Practice, 21(6), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1821632
Yorks, L., & Nicolaides, A. (2013). Toward an integral approach for evolving mindsets for generative learning and timely action in the midst of ambiguity. Teachers College Record, 115(8), 1-26.