Redefining Learning Outcomes in Higher Education through Centers for Teaching and Learning

PDF (English)
Δημοσιευμένα: Jan. 10, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/haea.39856
Venetia Nouri
PhD(c) Democritus University of Thrace
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2381-2023
Περίληψη

This paper critically examines the role of Centers for Teaching and Learning (CTLs) in enhancing learning outcomes within higher education institutions. CTLs are pivotal in fostering effective teaching environments, enhancing faculty capabilities, and ultimately improving student learning outcomes. The paper delves into the theoretical underpinnings that inform CTL practices, highlighting the influence of adult learning theories, transformative learning, and critical pedagogy on faculty development initiatives. It assesses CTLs' strategies in course design and student assessment, discussing the practical challenges such as funding limitations and resistance to pedagogical shifts. Moreover, it explores the broader implications of CTLs on institutional policies and the integration of technology in teaching. The paper proposes strategic enhancements for CTLs, including increased funding, policy reform, and leveraging international collaborations to enrich teaching practices. Through a comprehensive analysis of CTLs' impact on learning outcomes, the paper underscores their indispensable role in the continuous evolution of higher education.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Creative Commons License

Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το CC Αναφορά Δημιουργού 4.0.

Οι Συγγραφείς που δημοσιεύουν εργασίες τους σε αυτό το περιοδικό συμφωνούν στους παρακάτω όρους:

  1. Οι Συγγραφείς διατηρούν τα Πνευματικά Δικαιώματα και χορηγούν στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης ενώ ταυτόχρονα τα πνευματικά δικαιώματα της εργασίας προστατεύονται σύμφωνα με την Creative Commons Attribution License που επιτρέπει σε τρίτους - αποδέκτες της άδειας να χρησιμοποιούν την εργασία όπως θέλουν με την προϋπόθεση της διατήρησης των διατυπώσεων που προβλέπονται στην άδεια σχετικά με την αναφορά στον αρχικό δημιουργό και την αρχική δημοσίευση σε αυτό το περιοδικό.
  2. Οι Συγγραφείς μπορούν να συνάπτουν ξεχωριστές, και πρόσθετες συμβάσεις και συμφωνίες για τη μη αποκλειστική διανομή της εργασίας όπως δημοσιεύτηκε στο περιοδικό αυτό (π.χ. κατάθεση σε ένα ακαδημαϊκό καταθετήριο ή δημοσίευση σε ένα βιβλίο), με την προϋπόθεση της αναγνώρισης και την αναφοράς της πρώτης δημοσίευσης σε αυτό το περιοδικό.
  3. Το περιοδικό επιτρέπει και ενθαρρύνει τους Συγγραφείς να καταθέτουν τις εργασίες τους μέσω διαδικτύου (π.χ. σε ένα ακαδημαϊκό καταθετήριο ή στις προσωπικές τους ιστοσελίδες) πριν και μετά από τις διαδικασίες της δημοσίευσης, καθώς αυτό μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε παραγωγική ανταλλαγή ιδεών και σκέψεων καθώς επίσης και σε γρηγορότερη και μεγαλύτερη χρήση και ευρετηρίαση της δημοσιευμένης εργασίας (See The Effect of Open Access).
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Alyasin, A., Nasser, R., Hajj, M. E., & Harb, H. (2023). Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: From Practice to Systematization. TEM Journal, 12(3), 1593-1604. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM123-41
Arnold, C. (2020). Learning outcomes, academic credit, and student mobility. Queen’s University, School of Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781553395560
Asimakopoulos, G., Karalis, T., & Kedraka, K. (2021). The Role of Centers of Teaching and Learning in Supporting Higher Education Students Learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(13), 69-78.
Beckley, T. J. (2022). How do Higher Education Teaching and Learning Centers Contribute to an Institutional Culture of Assessment?(Order No. 29283510). ProQuest One Academic.
Bothell, T. W., & Henderson, T. (2004). 4: Evaluating the Return on Investment of Faculty Development. To improve the academy, 22(1), 52-70.
Bracken, S., & Novak, K. (Eds.). (2019). Transforming higher education through universal design for learning: An international perspective (1st ed.). Routledge.
Cook, C., & Kaplan, M. (Eds.). (2011). Advancing the culture of teaching on campus: How a teaching center can make a difference. Taylor & Francis Group.
Duchatelet, D., Cornelissen, F., & Volman, M. (2024). Features of experiential learning environments in relation to generic learning outcomes in higher education: A scoping review. The Journal of Experiential Education, 47(3), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231211537
Ebel, R., Ahmed, S., Thornton, A., Watt, C., Dring, C., & Sames, A. (2019). Curriculum Assessment Practices That Incorporate Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. NACTA Journal, 64, 238–254.
ENQA, ESU, EUA, EURASHE, & EQAR. (2015). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Brussels, Belgium: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
ENQA. (2024). ESG revision process and structures: Briefing note October 2024. Retrieved from https://www.enqa.eu
European University Association (EUA). (2024). Development and strategic benefits of learning and teaching centres: 2024 EUA TPG report. Retrieved from https://www.eua.eu
Freire, P. (1978). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In Toward a sociology of education (pp. 374-386). Routledge.
Harvard Online. (n.d.). Higher education teaching certificate. Retrieved from https://www.harvardonline.harvard.edu/course/higher-education-teaching?utm_source
Higher education in the next decade: Global challenges, future prospects. (2021). BRILL.
Hines, Susan. “Investigating Faculty Development Program Assessment Practices: What’s Being Done and How Can It Be Improved?” The journal of faculty development 23.3 (2009): 5–19. Print.
Holt, D., Palmer, S., & Challis, D. (2011). Changing perspectives: teaching and learning centres’ strategic contributions to academic development in Australian higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.546211
Huda, N., Mustaji, Arianto, F., & Ayubi, N. (2022). The Application of Blended Learning with a Community Science Technology Approach to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 17(14), 246-252. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i14.32927
Inside Higher Ed. (2023). The evolving role of teaching and learning centers in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/teaching/2023/09/13/new-book-explores-rise-teaching-and-learning-centers?utm_source
Kaltsidis, C., Orfanidou, C., Kedraka, K., & Karalis, T. (2021). Faculty views, practices, and priorities for training and professional development: A case study in two Greek peripheral Universities. Mediterranean Journal of Education, 1(1), 102–124.
Kedraka, K., & Rotidi, G. (2017). University Pedagogy: A New Culture Is Emerging in Greek Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 147-153.
Kedraka, K., Karalis, T., & Raikou, N. (2024). Transformative learning future orientations study: An overview. Adult Education Critical Issues, 4(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.12681/haea.38427
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Theory of andragogy. A Critique. International Journal of Lifelong. Cambridge MA.
Marhaya, L., Malatji, K. S., & Maphosa, C. (2017). Participants' reflection on writing retreats as held by a teaching and learning centre in a higher education institution: Implications for improved scholarship of teaching and learning. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 54–69.
Marques, J., & Garrett, N. (2012). Implementing mission-driven assurance of learning: Improving performance through constructive collaboration. Journal of Education for Business, 87(4), 214-222.
Michelsen, S., Sweetman, R., Stensaker, B., & Bleiklie, I. (2016). Shaping perceptions of a policy instrument: The political–administrative formation of learning outcomes in higher education in Norway and England. Higher Education Policy, 29(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0009-5
OECD (2019). Envisioning the future of education and jobs: Trends, data and drawing. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/education/Envisioning-the-future-of-education-and-jobs.pdf
Rico-Juan, J. R., Cachero, C., & Macià, H. (2021). Influence of individual versus collaborative peer assessment on score accuracy and learning outcomes in higher education: an empirical study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1955090
Shafait, Z., Hussain, A., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., & Rehman, S. U. (2021). Modeling the mediating roles of self-directed learning and knowledge management processes between emotional intelligence and learning outcomes in higher education. PLOS ONE, 16(7), e0255177
Sorcinelli, M. D., & Yun, J. (2007). From mentor to mentoring networks: Mentoring in the new academy. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(6), 58-61. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.39.6.58-C4
Travis, J. E., Hursh, D., Lankewicz, G., & Tang, L. (1996). Monitoring the pulse of the faculty: Needs assessment in faculty development programs. To Improve the Academy, 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/tia.17063888.0015.009
Tzotzou, M., Poulou, M., Karalis, T., & Ifanti, A. (2024). INSET content towards teachers' professional development in the 21st century: Global challenges. European Journal of Education Studies, 11(9), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i9.5483
Tzovla, E., & Kedraka, K. (2023). Follow-up: A neglected experiential process within a transformational learning community for teachers as adult learners during the pandemic. Adult Education Critical Issues, 3(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.12681/haea.34822
University of Wisconsin–Madison. (2024). Writing student learning outcomes. Retrieved December 14, 2024, from https://assessment.wisc.edu/student-learning-outcomes/writing-student-learning-outcomes/
Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., Janke, S., Dickhäuser, O., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2024). Putting ICAP to the test: How technology-enhanced learning activities are related to cognitive and affective-motivational learning outcomes in higher education. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 16295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66069-y
Welsh, J. F., & Metcalf, J. (2003). Cultivating faculty support for institutional effectiveness activities: Benchmarking best practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (1), 33 – 46.
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Pant, H. A., & Coates, H. (2016). Assessing student learning outcomes in higher education: challenges and international perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(5), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1169501