EVALUATION IN MATHEMATICS: ASPECTS OF CONCEPTUALISATION OF TEACHERS IN PRIMARY EDUCATION


Published: Jul 24, 2017
Keywords:
evaluation conceptualisation teachers
 Άννα Κλώθου (Anna Klothou)
Χαράλαμπος Σακονίδης (Xaralambos Sakonidis)
Abstract

The present study deals with the way primary school teachers conceptualize pupils’ assessment in mathematics and it develops on two levels. On the fi rst, that of the teachers’ community, it attempts to depict the main characteristics of this conceptualization, recognizing the essential role played by the professional apprenticeship in its formation. On the second level, considering pupils’ work assessment by the teacher as a particularly social but also subjective process, the study examines the pedagogical discourse of individual teachers, concentrating on the resources they draw on and the positions they adopt within this discourse with respect to assessing. For the purposes of the present study, the responses of 553 teachers to specifi c questions of a questionnaire (fi rst level) as well as the responses of a certain teacher to the questions of an interview (second level) were analyzed utilizing the Correspondance Analysis and the Hierarchical cluster analysis, as well as techniques of the Grounded Theory and the Systemic Analysis respectively. The results indicate the function of three mainly factors on teachers’ conceptualization of pupils’ assessment in mathematics: the teaching practice, the institutional framework and their personal and professional relationship with the subject matter. The way in which these three factors act and interact, as well as the effect of this action on the conceptualization of the assessment process differs from teacher to teacher. This is due to a number of social parameters and mechanisms which result to the co-existence of contradictory conceptualizations not only on micro but also on macro level.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
 Άννα Κλώθου (Anna Klothou), DEMOCRATIC UNIVERSITY OF THRACE
SHCOOL CANCELOR
Χαράλαμπος Σακονίδης (Xaralambos Sakonidis), DEMOCRATIC UNIVERSITY OF THRACE
PROFESSOR
References
Bliss, J., Monk, M. & Ogborn, J. (1987). Qualitative Data Analysis for Educational Research,
New York: Croom Helm.
Broadfoot, P.(2007). An Introduction to Assessment. London: Continuum.
Broadfoot, P. (2008). Comparative Perspectives on the Changing Role of Teachers. In
D. Johnson & R. Maclean (eds), Teaching: Professionalisation, Development and
Leadership. Springer Science, pp. 263 - 271
Everitt, B. (1993), Cluster Analysis, London: Edward Arnold.
Filer, A. & Pollard, A. (2000) The Social World of Pupil Assessment in Primary School,
London: Continuum
Greenacre, M. J. (2007). Correspondence Analysis in Practice. Second Edition. London:
Chapman & Hall / CRC Press.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data
Analysis. Sixth Edition. London: Prentice Hall.
Κασσωτάκης, Μ. (1990). Η αξιολόγηση της επίδοσης των μαθητών. Αθήνα: Γρηγόρης.
Kress, G. (1989). Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Κυρίδης, Α. (1994). Κριτική της αποστήθισης ως μαθησιακής μεθόδου και κριτηρίου για
την αξιολόγηση της μαθητικής επίδοσης – Αποστήθιση και Γενικές Εξετάσεις. Σύγ-
χρονη Εκπαίδευση, τ. 77, 21-28.
Lebart, L. (1994). Complementary use of correspondence analysis and cluster analysis.
In M. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the social sciences.
Recent developments and applications (pp. 162-178). London: Academic
Press.
Markos, A., Menexes, G. & Papadimitriou, I. (2009). The CHIC Analysis Software v1.0. In
H. Locarek-Junge & C. Weihs (Eds.), Studies in Classifi cation, Data Analysis and
Knowledge Organization, New York: Springer.
Morgan, C. (1998) Writing Mathematically: The Discourse of Investigation, London: Falmer.
Morgan, C. (2000). Better assessment in mathematics education? A social perspective.
Ιn J. Boaler (Ed.) Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning,
Westport, CT: Ablex.
Morgan & Watson, (2002). The Interpretative Nature of Teachers’ Assessment of Students’
Mathematics: Issues for equity. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education,
Vol. 33, No. 2, 78-110.
Morgan, C., Tsatsaroni, A. & Lerman, S. (2002). Mathematics teachers’ positions and
practices in discourses of assessment, British Journal of Sociology of Education.
Vol. 23, No. 3, 445-461.
Nishisato, S. (1994). Elements of dual scaling: An introduction to practical data analysis,
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perrenoud, P. (1995). Οι συνήθεις διαδικασίες αξιολόγησης τροχοπέδη στην αλλαγή των
παιδαγωγικών πρακτικών. Εκπαιδευτική Κοινότητα, τ. 31, 31-37.
Perrenoud, P. (1996). Πώς να καταπολεμήσετε τη σχολική αποτυχία σε δέκα μαθήματα.
Εκπαιδευτική Κοινότητα, τ. 39, 16-23.
Παπαδημήτριου, Γ. (2007). Η ανάλυση δεδομένων, Αθήνα: Τυπωθήτω – Γιώργος Δαρδά-
νος.
Shepard, L. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher,
Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 4–14.
Tsatsaroni, A., Morgan, C. & Evans, J. (2007) Pedagogic Discourse, Positioning and
Emotion: Illustrations from School Mathematics, Review of Science, Mathematics
and ICT Education, 1(1), 83-105.
Philippou, G.N., Monoyiou, A. & Kaury Z. (2011). Teachers’ epistemological beliefs,
their conceptions about teaching and the beliefs of their students’. Research in
Mathematics Education, 3 (1), 39-71.
Chysostomou, M. & Philippou, G. (2010). Teachers’ epistemological beliefs and effi cacy
beliefs about Mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.9, pp.
-1515.