SCHEMES OF DYNAMIC MANIPULATION OF GEOMETRIC CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT OF MEANING FOR RATIO AND PROPORTION


Published: Oct 8, 2018
Keywords:
enlarging-shrinking geometrical figures dynamic manipulation ratio proportion
Γιώργος Ψυχάρης (Giorgos Psycharis)
Abstract

Recent research approaches studying the role of computational tools in the teaching and learning of mathematics have analyse it by paying a particular attention to the interaction between the development of mathematical knowledge and of instrumental genesis (Guin et al., 2005). The analytical frame of instrumental genesis (Verillon & Rabardel, 1995) is based on the distinction between artefact and instrument with the latter having a psychological component (scheme), indicating the dialectic relationship between activity and implicit mathematical knowledge, that a subject operationalises when using the artefact to carry out some task (Trouche, 2005). The activity that employs and is shaped by the use of instruments (instrumented activity) is directed towards the artefact, eventually transforming it for specific uses (instrumentalisation), as well as towards the subject leading to the development or appropriation of schemes (of instrumented action) in which the subject is shaped by actions with the artefact (instrumentation) (Artigue, 2002).

The present paper aims to offer a different perspective on the process of instrumental genesis based on the kinesthetic control of figures in a computer environment - called 'Turtleworlds' - which combines symbolic notation through a programming language (Logo) with dynamic manipulation of variable procedure values using a specially designed computational tool called variation tool (Kynigos, 2004). The 13- year-old students worked in collaborative groups of two to build enlarging-shrinking figurai models of capital letters of varying sizes in proportion by using only one variable to express the multiplicative relationships within each geometrical figure which very often are perceived by students as additive rather than multiplicative (Hart, 1981, 1984' Vergnaud 1983). Students had to continually connect formal and graphical descriptions of geometrical figures and by manipulating variable segments or angles to appreciate the inappropriateness of additive strategies. This is augmented by the idea of constructionism (Harel & Paperi, 1991) since these figures were their own productions and would be used by others later.

The analysis elaborates the role of students ' exploration with the dynamic manipulation feature of the computer environment in the process of instrumental genesis and highlights the relationship between the evolution of the dragging schemes developed by the children with their evolving mathematical knowledge for enlarging-shrinking geometrical figures. So far, we discuss students' use of normalising (similar to the sense of Ainley et al., 2001), an activity in which children 'correct' the distorted geometrical figures or other graphical abnormalities on them through the use of the available tools.

The analysis revealed the different dynamic manipulation schemes generated as students begin to use the variation tool for exploring the construction of enlarging- shrinking geometrical figures. Under the constructionist perspective these schemes illustrate the dialectic relationship between the evolution of instrumental genesis and student's progressive focusing on relations and dependencies underlying the current geometrical constructions and its representations. According to the results, the key difference amongst the described schemes is that in the evolution of instrumental enesis the appreciation of the computer feedback was much more closely bound into correlations rooted in action (within the same or a new dynamic manipulation scheme) and inextricably linked with the use of the variation tool. As soon as the variation tool became part of students' activity, students' instrumented actions progressively evolved from the visual to the conceptual level indicated by the development of mathematical practices involving the appreciation of the (scalar) relation between the lengths of similar geometrical figures, the identification and testing of multiplicative functional relationships among particular variable lengths as well as the generalization of employed multiplicative strategies.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Γιώργος Ψυχάρης (Giorgos Psycharis), Educational Technology Laboratory, University of Athens
Assistant Professor
References
Ainley, J., Pratt, D. & Hansen, A. (2006). Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design. British Educational Research Journal, 32 (1), 23-38.
Ainley, J., Pratt, D. & Nardi, E. (2001 ). Normalising: Children's activity to construct meanings for trend. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 131-146.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning Mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7 (3), 245-274.
Artigue, M. & Bardini, C. (in press) New didactical phenomena prompted by TI-nspire specificities - the mathematical component of the instrumentation process. Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME). L yon, France.
Arzarello, F., Micheletti, C , Olivero, F., Robutti, Ο., Paola, D. & Gallino, G. (1998) Dragging in Cabri and modalities of transition from conjectures to proofs in geometry. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd PME Conference (vol. 2, pp. 32-39). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, Α., Lehrer, P.& Schäuble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 9-13.
Drijvers, P. & Trouche, L. 2008. From artifacts to instruments, A theoretical framework behind the orchestra metaphor. In G.W. Blume & Μ. Κ. Heid (Eds.), Reaserch ο technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Voc 2 cases and perspectives (p.p. 363 - 391). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Duval, R. (1995). Semiosis et Pensée humaine. Registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels. Bern: Peter Lang.
Guin, D. & Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computer sfor Mathematical Learning, 3 (3), 195-227.
Guin, D., Ruthven, K. & Trouche, L. (2005). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. N e w York NY: Springer.
Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R. & Schwarz, Β. Β. (2000). The role of contradiction and uncertainty in promoting the need to prove in dynamic geometry environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 127-150.
Harel, I. & Paperi, S. (1991). Constructionism: Research reports and essays. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
Hart, K. M. (Ed.) (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16. John Murray, London.
H
art, K. M. (1984). Ratio: Children's Strategies and Errors, Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Hölzl, R. (2001). Using dynamic geometry software to add contrast to geometric situations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 63-86.
Hoyles, C. & Noss, R. (1989). The computer as a catalyst in children's proportion strategies. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 8, 53-75.
Karplus, R., Pulos, S. & Stage, E. K. (1983). Proportional reasoning of early adolescents. In R. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 45-90). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. .
Κολέζα, E. (2000). Γνωσιολογική και διδακτική προσέγγιση των στοιχειωδών μαθηματικών εννοιών. Leader Books, Αθήνα.
Kynigos, C. (2004). A "black-and-white box" approach to user empowerment with component computing. Interactive Learning Environments, 12 (1-2), 27-71.
Mariotti, M. A. (2000). Introduction to proof: The mediation of a dynamic software
environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 25-53.
Noss, R. & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Academic Press.Psycharis, G. & Kynigos, C. & (2004). Normalising geometrical constructions: A context for the generation of meanings for ratio and proportion. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28'h PME Conference (vol. 4, pp. 65-72). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Strauss, A . & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Toumiaire, F, & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional Reasoning: A review of the literature.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16 (2), 181-204.
Trouche, L. (2005). An instrumental approach to mathematics learning in symbolic calculators environments. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven & L. Trouche, L. (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument (pp. 137-162). New York NY: Springer.
Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.) Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 127-174). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Vergnaud, G. (1998). A comprehensive theory of representation for mathematics education Journal of Mathematical behavior, 17 (2), 167-181.
Veriilon, P. & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artefacts: a contribution to the study oi thought in relation to instmmented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education /0(1),77-101.
Χασάπης, Δ. (2001). Διδακτική βασικών μαθηματικών εννοιών. Μεταίχμιο, Αθήνα. Χρίστου, Κ. & Φιλίππου, Γ. (1999). Άτυπα μοντέλα προβλημάτων αναλογίας. Πρακτικά 16ου Πανελληνίου Συνεδρίου Μαθηματικής Παιδείας, 1 3 8 - 1 5 1 .
Ψυχάρης, Γ. (2005). Ανάπτυξη νοημάτων για τις έννοιες λόγου και αναλογίας σε προβλήματα αυξομείωσης γεωμετρικών κατασκευών με χρήση ειδικών εργαλείων υπολογιστικής τεχνολογίας. Διδακτορική διατριβή, Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών.