The Ecological Self: Integrating Environmental Psychology, Ecopsychology, and Ecotheology in the Anthropocene

ΤΟΜΟΣ 6(1), 22-35.pdf (ελληνικά)
Publicado: Jan 20, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/ees.38255
Georgios Fountoulakis
Professor, Department of Social Theology & the Study of Religion, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8731-5047
Khader I. Alkhouri
Phd, Department of Social Theology & the Study of Religion, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Resumen

This article provides an in-depth exploration of the intersection between environmental psychology, ecopsychology, and ecotheology in addressing contemporary environmental challenges. It examines how these interdisciplinary fields can contribute to fostering sustainable human-nature relationships and environmental stewardship in the context of the Anthropocene. The research analyzes psychological, spiritual, and ethical dimensions of human-nature interactions, emphasizing the need for an integrative approach that incorporates scientific, humanistic, and spiritual perspectives. Key themes include the psychological and health impacts of nature exposure, religious and philosophical views of nature, environmental ethics, risk perception, adaptation to environmental changes, and strategies for promoting pro-environmental behaviors. By synthesizing insights from multiple disciplines, this article aims to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and nurturing the ecological self in the face of global environmental challenges.

Article Details
  • Sección
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Οι συγγραφείς διατηρούν τα πνευματικά δικαιώματα και παρέχουν στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης μαζί με την αδειοδότηση της εργασίας με CC-BY-NC-SA, που επιτρέπει σε άλλους να μοιράζονται αυτή την εργασία με αναγνώριση του συγγραφικού δικαιώματος και την αρχική δημοσίευση σε αυτό το περιοδικό.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Arias-Maldonado, M. (2020). Anthropocene: The political ecology of the Anthropocene. Routledge.
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207-1212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
Biermann, F., Bai, X., Bondre, N., Broadgate, W., Chen, C. T. A., Dube, O. P., ... & Seto, K. C. (2016). Down to Earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 39, 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.004
Bradford, R. A., O' Sullivan, J. J., van der Craats, I. M., Krywkow, J., Rotko, P., Aaltonen, J., ... & Schelfaut, K. (2012). Risk perception - issues for flood management in Europe. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12(7), 2299-2309. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-12-2299-2012
Γεωργόπουλος, Α. (2002). Περιβαλλοντική ηθική.Αθήνα: Gutenberg.
Γιαννουλάτος, Α. (2000). Παγκοσμιότητα και Ορθοδοξία.Μελετήματα Ορθόδοξου προβληματισμού. Αθήνα: Ακρίτας.
Castree, N. (2014). The Anthropocene and the environmental humanities: Extending the conversation. Environmental Humanities, 5(1), 233-260. DOI: 10.1215/22011919-3615496
Conn, S. A. (1998). Living in the earth: Ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. The Humanistic Psychologist,26(1-3), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.1998.9976972
Crist, E. (2013). On the poverty of our nomenclature. Environmental Humanities, 3(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3611266
Crutzen, P. J. & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17-18.
Deane-Drummond, C. (2008). Eco-theology. Anselm Academic.
Fisher, A. (2012). Radical ecopsychology: Psychology in the service of life. SUNY Press.
Foltz, R. C. (2006). Islam. In R. S. Gottlieb (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of religion and ecology (pp. 207-219). Oxford University Press.
Gikas, S. (1966). Panentheism. In Theological Dictionary of the Church, 9. Athens.
Gottlieb, R. S. (Ed.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of religion and ecology. Oxford University Press.
Howe, P. D., Marlon, J. R., Mildenberger, M. & Shield, B. S. (2019). How will climate change shape climate opinion?. Environmental Research Letters, 14(11), 113001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab466a
Jenkins, W. (2008). Ecologies of grace: Environmental ethics and Christian theology. Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
Lewis, S. L. & Maslin, M. A. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171-180. DOI: 10.1038/nature14258
Liman, M. W. & Wen-qiao, L. (2022). Chronic vulnerability to natural disasters and subjective well-being.Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 3, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100041
Malm, A. & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62-69. DOI: 10.1177/2053019613516291
Moore, J. W. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press.
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement.A summary. Inquiry, 16(1-4), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682
Osbaldiston, R. & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 257-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402673
Palsson, G., Szerszynski, B., Sörlin, S., Marks, J., Avril, B., Crumley, C., ... & Weehuizen, R. (2013). Reconceptualizing the 'Anthropos' in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy, 28, 3-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004
Pihkala, P. (2018). Eco‐anxiety, tragedy, and hope: Psychological and spiritual dimensions of climate change. Zygon, 53(2), 545-569. DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12407
Poussin, J. K., Botzen, W. W., & Aerts, J. C. (2014). Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environmental Science & Policy, 40, 69-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.013
Richert, C., Erdlenbruch, K., & Grelot, F. (2019). The impact of flood management policies on individual adaptation actions: Insights from a French case study. Ecological Economics, 166, 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106387
Roszak, T., Gomes, M. E. & Kanner, A. D. (Eds.). (1995). Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind. Sierra Club Books.
Ruddiman, W. F. (2013). The Anthropocene. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 41, 45-68. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-123944
Sandler, R. L. (2007). Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. Columbia University Press.
Schmidt, J. J., Brown, P. G. & Orr, C. J. (2016). Ethics in the Anthropocene: A research agenda. The Anthropocene Review, 3(3), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616662052
Siegrist, M. & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 713-720. DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.205064
Sponsel, L. E. (2012). Spiritual ecology: A quiet revolution. Praeger.
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O. & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81-98. DOI: 10.1177/2053019614564785
Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. & McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 842-867. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., ... & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252-8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Steg, L., van den Berg, A. E., & de Groot, J. I. M. (Eds.). (2012). Environmental psychology: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C. & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049-1065. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Barnosky, A. D., Poirier, C., Gałuszka, A., ... & Wolfe, A. P. (2016). The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351(6269). DOI: 10.1126/science.aad2622
Watson, R. A. (2005). A critique of anti-anthropocentric biocentrism. Environmental Ethics, 5(3), 245-256. Doi: 10.5840/enviroethics19835325
Wilkinson, B. H., McElroy, B. J., Kesler, S. E., Peters, S. E., & Rothman, E. D. (2014). Global geologic maps are tectonic speedometer- Rates of rock cycling from area-age frequencies. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 126(3-4), 374-380. DOI: 10.1130/B26457.1
Williams, M., Zalasiewicz, J., Haff, P. K., Schwägerl, C., Barnosky, A. D. & Ellis, E. C. (2016). The Anthropocene biosphere. The Anthropocene Review, 3(2), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019615591020
Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Williams, M., Barnosky, A. D., Cearreta, A., Crutzen, P. ... & Oreskes, N. (2015). When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal. Quaternary International, 383, 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Haywood, A. & Ellis, M. (2011). The Anthropocene: a new epoch of geological time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 835-841. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0339
Zaleha, B. D. (2009). "The Least of These": The Evangelical Environmental Movement's Challenge to Contemporary American Fundamentalism. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 3(2), 199-225.