| More


Views: 120 Downloads: 118
A. Argyraki, N. Petrakaki
A. Argyraki, N. Petrakaki


Heterogeneity in metal concentrations is a typical characteristic of contaminated sampling targets, with consequences in the estimation of measurement Nuncertainty and the spatial delineation of contamination. Heterogeneity of Ncontamination is site specific and is linked to the type and origin of the Ncontaminants. In this paper we present a case study on a completed firing range, at Skopeftirio Park in Kesariani, Athens, Greece. The study focused on two heavy metals in the soil with contrasting properties. Lead, an element with high concentrations due to the previous land use of the park and Cr, an Nelement with concentrations close to the natural background at this site. Forty nine top soils samples (0-10cm) were collected from an area of 0.7 km2 by using a 40m x 40m grid. Duplicate samples were collected from 8 randomly selected sampling sites, 5 m away from the original sampling location and were analyzed in duplicate for the estimation of measurement uncertainly. Elemental concentrations were measured by AAS after an aqua- regia acid attack. Robust analysis of variance applied on duplicate measurements separated the total variability of the results into three components, representing the analytical, sampling and geochemical variances for the two elements in soil. It was shown that the combined sampling and analytical variance for the Pb has a high proportion in the total (53.5%) reflecting the extreme small-scale spatial variation of Pb contamination. For Cr, the proportion is lower (17%) indicating a more homogeneous distribution of elemental concentrations.


geochemical sampling; measurement uncertainty; heterogeneity; ANOVA; contaminated soil; heavy metals;

Full Text:



Analytical Methods Committee. 1989. Robust Statistics – How not to reject outliers, Part 1, Basic Concepts,

Analyst, 114, 1693-1697.

ISO 1993. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). Geneva (2nd printing 1995).

Lyn, J.A., Ramsey, M.H., Coad, D.S., Damant, A.P., Wood, R., Boon, K.A. 2007. The duplicate method

of uncertainty estimation: are eight targets enough?, Analyst, 132, 1147-1152.

Papanicolaou, D., Lozios, S., Soukis, K. and Skourtsos, E. 2004. Geological structure of the allochthon

system of Athens. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Greek Geological Society, Thesalloniki,

vol. XXXVI, 1550-1559.

Petrakaki, N. 2009. Geochemical distribution of Pb in shooting range soils: The case of Kesariani’s shooting

range, MSc Thesis, University of Athens, Athens (in Greek)

Ramsey M.H. and Ellison S.L.R. (eds) Eurachem/EUROLAB/CITAC/Nordtest/amc Guide. 2007. Measurement

uncertainty arising from sampling; a guide to methods and approaches, Eurachem.

Ramsey, M.H. 1993. Sampling and analytical quality control (SAX) for improved error estimation in the

measurement of Pb in the environment using robust analysis of variance, Applied Geochemistry,

Suppl. Issue No.2, 149-153.

Ramsey, M.H. 1994. Error estimation in environmental sampling and analysis, in: B. Market, Ed. Environmental

Sampling for Trace Analysis, VCH, Weinheim, p. 93-108.

Ramsey, M.H. 1998. Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and

comparison with analytical sources, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 13, 97-104.

Ramsey, M.H. and Argyraki, A. 1997. Estimation of measurement uncertainty from field sampling: Implications

for the classification of contaminated land, The Science of the Total Environment, 198, 243-

Ramsey, M.H. and Thompson, M. 2007. Uncertainty from sampling, in the context of fitness for purpose,

Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 12, 503-513.

Taylor, P.D., Ramsey, M.H., Potts, P.J. 2005. Spatial contaminant heterogeneity: quantification with scale

of measurement at contrasting sites, Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 7, 1364-1370.

Thompson, M. and Fearn, T. 1990. What exactly is fitness for purpose in analytical measurement?, Analyst,

, 273-278.

Thompson, M. and Ramsey, M.H. 1995. Quality concepts and practices applied to sampling – an exploratory

study, Analyst, 120, 261-270.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 A. Argyraki, N. Petrakaki

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.