A comparative assessment of two different methods, using devices Optiscan-TP and Optigrade-MCP, for predicting the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses in Greece in relation to the European reference method

PDF (English)
Publicado: Jan 21, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.28409
V Schina
Department of Animal ProductionFaculty of AgricultureSchool of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University54124 ThessalonikiGreece
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-4668
V Dotas
Department of Animal ProductionFaculty of AgricultureSchool of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University54124 ThessalonikiGreece
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4505-3515
D Gourdouvelis
Department of Animal ProductionFaculty of AgricultureSchool of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University54124 ThessalonikiGreece
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1140-7378
I Kaimakamis
Department of Animal ProductionFaculty of AgricultureSchool of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University54124 ThessalonikiGreece
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1136-3563
I Mitsopoulos
Division of Animal ScienceDepartment of AgricultureSchool of Geotechnical SciencesInternational Hellenic University57400 ThessalonikiGreece
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7953-6937
G Tsakanikas
Association of Greek Slaughterhouses54626 ThessalonikiGreece
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2623-4222
V Bampidis
Division of Animal ScienceDepartment of AgricultureSchool of Geotechnical SciencesInternational Hellenic University57400 ThessalonikiGreece
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-6365
Resumen

Lean Meat Percentage (LMP) is a key index for assessing pork carcass quality as well as determining carcass classification and price. This framework offers to farmers the incentive to achieve the desired organoleptic features; therefore LMP must be measured objectively online, by means of various measuring instruments. The aim of this work was to assess two different methods for predicting the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses in Greece in comparison to the European reference method. For this reason, the same 130 pig carcasses (65 males and 65 females) were measured using 2 prediction devices (Optiscan-TP and Optigrade-MCP) and subsequently were assessed according to European reference method. A formula corresponding to each device was constructed using the ordinary least squares (OLS)method and excluding the same outliers. Calculated RMSEP for all 130 carcasses was 2.46518 for Optiscan-TP and 2.48489 for Optigrade-MCP. It can be concluded that both methods perform entirely according to EU legislation (Commission Regulation (EC) 1249/2008, European Union, 2008), and results obtained are similar regardless of different measurement points and technologies.

Article Details
  • Sección
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Baulain, U. (2013). Body composition of farm animals by MRI. In: Maltin, C., Craigie, C., Bünger, L. (Eds.), Farm Animal Imaging, Dublin 2012. Quality Meat Scotland, UK, pp. 16–19.
Brøndum, J., Egebo, M., Agerskov, C., Busk, H. (1998). On-line pork carcass grading with the Autofom ultrasound system. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1859–1868.
Busk, H., Olsen, E.V., Brøndum, J. (1999). Determination of lean meat in pig carcasses with the Autofom classification system. Meat Science 52, 307–314.
Causeur, D., Daumas, G., Dhorne, T., Engel, B., Font I Furnols, M., Højsgaadr, S. (2006). Statistical handbook for assessing pig classification methods: Recommendations from the EUPIGCLASS project group. EU working document 132, URL: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/markets/pig/handbook.pdf.
Cook, G.L., Yates, C.M. (1992). A report to the Commission of the European Communities on research concerning the harmonization of methods for grading pig carcasses in the Community.
Delgado-Pando, G., Allen, P., Troy, D.J., McDonnell, C.K. (2021). Objective carcass measurement technologies: Latest developments and future trends. Trends in Food Science and Technology 111, 771–782.
Engel, B., Buist, W.G., Walstra, P., Olsen, E., Daumas, G. (2003). Accuracy of prediction of percentage lean meat and authorization of carcass measurement instruments: adverse effects of incorrect sampling of carcasses in pig classification. Animal Science 76, 199-209.
Engel, B., Lambooij, E., Buist, W.G., Reimert, H., Mateman, G. (2006). Prediction of the percentage lean of pig carcasses with a small or a large number of instrumental carcass measurements - An illustration with HGP and Vision. Animal Science 82, 919–928.
Engel, Β., Lambooij,Β., Buist, W.G., Vereijken, P. (2012). Lean meat prediction with HGP, CGM and CSB-Image-Meater, with prediction accuracy evaluated for different proportions of gilts, boars and castrated boars in the pig population. Meat Science 90, 338–344.
European Union (1994). Council Regulation (EEC) 3127/94 of 20 December 1994 amending Regulation (EC) No 2967/85 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcasses. Off. J. Eur. Union L330, 43.
European Union (2007). Council Regulation (EEC) 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organization of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products. Off. J. Eur. Union L299, 1–19.
European Union (2008). Commission Regulation (EC) 1249/2008 of 10 December 2008 laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and the reporting of prices thereof. Off. J. Eur. Union L249, 1–28.
European Union (2010). Commission Regulation (EC) 642/2010 of 20 July 2010 on rules of application (cereal sector import duties) for Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, L 187/5
Font i Furnols, M., Engel, B., Gispert, M. (2004). Validation of the Spanish equation to predict the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses with the Fat-o Meater. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 545–549.
Font i Furnols, M., Gispert, M. (2009). Comparison of different devices for predicting the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses. Meat Science 83(3), 443–446.
Fortin, A., Tong, A.K.W., Robertson, W.M., Zawadski, S.M., Landry, S.J., Robinson, D.J., Liu, T., Mockford, R.J. (2003). A novel approach to grading pork carcasses: Computer vision and ultrasound. Meat Science 63, 451–462.
Goenaga, P., Lloveras M.R., Améndola C. (2008). Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina. Meat Science 79, 611–613.
Halliwell M.A. (2010). Tutorial on ultrasonic physics and imaging techiques. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 224(2), 127–142.
Hellenic Ministry of Agricultural Development and Food (2017).www.minargic.gr
Hulsegge, B., Mercus, G.S.M. (2010). A comparison of the optical probe HGP and the ultrasonic devices Renco and Pie Medical for estimation of the lean meat proportion in pig carcasses. Animal Science 64, 379–383.
Jung Seck, Choi,, Ki Mun Kwon , Young Kyu Lee Jang Uk Joeng , Kyung Ok Lee , Sang Keun Jin , Yang Il Choi, Jae Joon Lee (2018). Application of AutoFom III equipment for prediction of primal and commercial cut weight of Korean pig carcasses Asian-Austr. J. Anim. Sci. 31(10), 1670–1676.
Johnson, R.K., Johnson, E.P., Goodwin, R., Mabry, J.W., Miller, R.K., Robison, O.W., Sellers, H., Tokach, M.D. (2004). Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2428–2441.
Picouet, P.A., Teran, F., Gispert, M., Font-i-Furnols, M. (2010). Lean content prediction in pig carcasses, loin and ham by computer tomography(CT) using a density model. Meat Science 86, 616–622.
Pfeiffer, H., Falkenberg, H. (1972). Masse am lendenspiegel zur objektiven ermittlungder schlachtkörperzusammensetzung beim schwein. Tierzucht 26, 466–467.
Walstra, P., Merkus, G.S. (1995). Procedure for assessment of the lean meat percentage as a consequence of the new EC reference dissection method in pig carcass classification. Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen UR, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a