Determination of the alterations in quality parameters and consumer preference of dry-aged beef based on different periods of ageing using a purposive incubator

PDF (English)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.26749
H USTUNER
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
S ARDICLI
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
O ARSLAN
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
Résumé

The aim of this study was to evaluate beef quality traits including pH, water holding capacity, cooking loss, meat colour, and Warner-Bratzler shear force in dry-aged beef and to determine the most favorable ageing time based on beef quality parameters and consumer acceptability. In this respect, longissimus dorsi samples were obtained from Simmental bulls and stored for an ageing period up to 21-days, and thus, the beef quality evaluation was performed at 0-day, 7-day, 14-day, and 21-day of the experimental period. Results revealed that the lowest shear force value was observed in beef samples on day-14 whereas the lowest pH value was determined in samples on day 21. Moreover, water holding capacity and beef colour values were significantly differentiated based on dry-ageing (P<0.05). In sensory panel evaluation, a significant difference is found only in meat colour rating (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between ageing periods and cooking loss. The most important technical point is that increasing dry-ageing time from 14 to 21 days did not desirably affect quality traits and sensory scores. Hence, dry-ageing for 14 days seemed to be the most economically efficient application. Taken altogether, the present results suggest that the potential for use of dry-ageing should be considered as an alternative method to produce high-quality beef with respect to the optimum ageing process.

Article Details
  • Rubrique
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Téléchargements
Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.
Références
Ahnström ML, Seyfert M, Hunt MC, Johnson DE(2006) Dry aging of beefin a bag highly permeable to water vapour. Meat Sci73(4): 674-679.
Ardicli S(2018) Genetik ve postmortem mekanizmaların sığır eti renk özellikleri üzerine etkisi. Uludag Univ J Fac Vet Med 37(1): 49-59 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
Campbell R, Hunt M, Levis P, Chambers E(2001) Dry‐aging effects on palatability of beef longissimus muscle. J Food Sci66(2): 196-199.
Dashdorj D, Tripathi VK, Cho S, Kim Y, Hwang I(2016) Dry aging of beef; review. J Anim Sci Technol 58(1): 20-30.
Ekiz B, Yilmaz A, Ozcan M, Kaptan C, Hanoglu H,ErdoganI, Yalcintan H (2009)Carcass measurements and meat quality of Turkish Merino, Ramlic, Kivircik, Chios and Imroz lambs raised under an intensive production system. Meat Sci 82(1): 64-70.
Gill JL, Bishop SC, McCorquodale C, Williams JL, Wiener P(2009) Association of selected SNP with carcass and taste panel assessed meat quality traits in a commercial population of Aberdeen Angus-sired beef cattle. Genet Sel Evol 41: 36-47.
Grau R, Hamm R(1957) Über das Wasserbindungsvermögen des Säugetiermuskels. II. Mitteilung. Über die Bestimmung der Wasserbindung des Muskels. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung 105(6): 446-460.
Hunt M, King A, Barbut S, Claus J, Cornforth D, Hanson D, Lindahl G, Mancini R, Milkowski A, Mohan A, Pohlman F, Raines C, Seyfert M, Sorheim O,Suman S, Weber M (2012) AMSA Meat Color Measurement Guidelines. Champaign, IL: American Meat Science Association, 1–135.
KaradumanTA, Gokce R, Ergezer H, Akcan T(2018) Some physicochemical and sensory properties of dry aged loin, rib and round meat from beef. Journal of Food and Feed Science – Technology 2018(20): 46-54 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
Koohmaraie M, Geesink G(2006)Contribution of postmortem muscle biochemistry to the delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the calpain system. Meat Sci74(1): 34-43.
Laster M, Smith R, Nicholson K, Nicholson J, Miller R, Griffin DB, Harris KB, Savell JW (2008)Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer sensory attribute evaluations of steaks from ribeyes, strip loins, and top sirloins from two quality grade groups. Meat Sci 80(3): 795-804.
Li X, Babol J, Bredie WL, Nielsen B, Tomankova J, Lundström K(2014) A comparative study of beef quality after ageing longissimus muscle using a dry ageing bag, traditional dry ageing or vacuum package ageing. Meat Sci 97(4): 433-442.
Miller MF, Carr M, Ramsey C, Crockett K, Hoover L(2001)Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. J Anim Sci79(12): 3062-3068.
Oreskovich DC, McKeith FK, Carr TR, Novakofski J, Bechtel PJ(1988) Effects of different aging procedures on the palatability of beef. J Food Qual11: 151–158.
PietrasikZ, Duda Z(2000) Effect of fat content and soy protein/carrageenan mix on the quality characteristics of comminuted, scalded sausages. Meat Sci56(2): 181-188.
Resconi VC, Campo MM, i Furnols MF, Montossi F, Sanudo C(2010) Sensory quality of beef from different finishing diets. Meat Sci 86(3): 865-869.
Sitz B, Calkins CR, Feuz DM, Umberge WJ, Eskridge KM(2006)Consumer sensory acceptance and value of wet-aged and dry-aged beef steaks. J Anim Sci84(5): 1221-1226.
Smith R, Nicholson K, Nicholson J, Harris K, Miller R(2008) Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer palatability evaluations of steaks from US Choice and US Select short loins. Meat Sci 79(4): 631-639.
Spanier AM, Flores M, McMilli KW, Bidne TD (1997) The effect of post-mortem aging on meat flavor quality in Brangus beef. Correlation of treatments, sensory, instrumental and chemical descriptors. Food Chem 59: 531–538.
Stenström H, Li X, Hunt MC,Lundström K(2014) Consumer preference and effect of correct or misleading information after ageing beef longissimus muscle using vacuum, dry ageing, or a dry ageing bag. Meat Sci 96(2): 661-666.
Warner R, Greenwood P, Pethick D, Ferguson D(2010) Genetic and environmental effects on meat quality. Meat Sci 86(1): 171-183.
Warren K, Kastner C (1992)Acomparison of dry-aged and vacuum-aged beef strip loins. J Muscle Foods 3(2): 151-157.
Articles les plus lus par le même auteur ou la même autrice