Η Πρώιμη ανίχνευση και αντιμετώπιση των μαθητών με δυσκολίες στον ψυχοκοινωνικό και μαθησιακό τομέα: Η Ενιαία Κλίμακα Αξιολόγησης και Παρέμβασης σε Επίπεδο Τάξης

Πρώιμη ανίχνευση και αντιμετώπιση των μαθητών με δυσκολίες στον ψυχοκοινωνικό και μαθησιακό τομέα: Η Ενιαία Κλίμακα Αξιολόγησης και Παρέμβασης σε Επίπεδο Τάξης
Δημοσιευμένα: mar 31, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jret.37033
Ελένη Διδασκάλου
Πανεπιστημίο Θεσσαλίας
Χριστίνα Ρούση- Βέργου
Πανεπιστημίο Θεσσαλίας
Περίληψη

Περίληψη


Μία από τις μεγαλύτερες προκλήσεις που καλούνται να αντιμετωπίσουν οι Έλληνες εκπαιδευτικοί στη μετά-COVID εποχή αποτελεί ο περιορισμός ενός αυξανόμενου αριθμού μαθητών που εκδηλώνουν συναισθηματικές και συμπεριφορικές δυσκολίες. Οι σύγχρονες εξελίξεις επισημαίνουν μία σημαντική στροφή, από την παραδοσιακή έμφαση στην αντιμετώπιση των έντονων προβλημάτων μεμονωμένων μαθητών, προς την κατεύθυνση της πρόληψης και στην παροχή υποστήριξης στο σύνολο του μαθητικού πληθυσμού. Ο καθολικός προσυμπτωματικός έλεγχος αποτελεί έναν ακριβή τρόπο προληπτικής αξιολόγησης των επιπέδων κινδύνου που διατρέχουν οι μαθητές να εκδηλώσουν συμπεριφορικές, συναισθηματικές και μαθησιακές προκλήσεις. Η παρούσα εργασία εστιάζει στην πιλοτική προσαρμογή, σε δείγμα Ελλήνων δασκάλων (Ν=38) και μαθητών (Ν=343), ενός νέου εργαλείου καθολικού προσυμπτωματικού ελέγχου. Συγκεκριμένα η Ενιαία Κλίμακα Αξιολόγησης και Παρέμβασης σε Επίπεδο Τάξης η αποτελείται από εβδομήντα τέσσερα συνολικά στοιχεία αξιολογεί και αναδεικνύει τη στοχοθεσία των εκπαιδευτικών παρεμβάσεων στους εξής τομείς: α) Συμπεριφορές Απορρύθμισης/Προβλήματα Ακαδημαϊκής Επίδοσης, β) Διαταρακτικές/Επιθετικές Συμπεριφορές γ) Αγχώδη/Καταθλιπτική Συμπεριφορά/ες και δ) Συμπεριφορές Κοινωνικής Απόσυρσης: Αποφυγή άλλων ανθρώπων ή ομαδικών δραστηριοτήτων. Περιγράφονται η δομή, το περιεχόμενο, τα αποτελέσματα των συσχετίσεων αξιολόγησης-επαναξιολόγησης, το μέγεθος της ακρίβειας ταξινόμησης καθώς  και της παραγοντικής ανάλυσης της κλίμακας.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Creative Commons License

Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το CC Αναφορά Δημιουργού – Μη Εμπορική Χρήση – Παρόμοια Διανομή 4.0.

Οι συγγραφείς που δημοσιεύουν σε αυτό το περιοδικό συμφωνούν στους παρακάτω όρους :

1. Οι συγγραφείς διατηρούν τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας επί των άρθρων τους, χορηγώντας στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης. Άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό «Επιστημονική Επετηρίδα του Παιδαγωγικού Τμήματος Νηπιαγωγών της Σχολής Επιστημών Αγωγής του Πανεπιστημίου Ιωαννίνων»  διατίθενται με άδεια Creative Commons 4.0, σύμφωνα με την οποία μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται ελεύθερα, με αναφορά στο/στη συγγραφέα και στην πρώτη δημοσίευση για μη κερδοσκοπικούς σκοπούς.

2. Οι συγγραφείς μπορούν να συνάπτουν ξεχωριστές, πρόσθετες συμβάσεις και συμφωνίες για την μη αποκλειστική διανομή του δημοσιευμένου στο περιοδικό έργου (π.χ. κατάθεση σε ένα ιδρυματικό αποθετήριο ή δημοσίευση σε ένα βιβλίο), με την αναγνώριση της πρώτης δημοσίευσης σε αυτό περιοδικό.

3. Στους συγγραφείς επιτρέπεται να δημοσιεύσουν την εργασία τους online (κατά προτίμηση σε ιδρυματικά αποθετήρια ή στην ιστοσελίδα τους) πριν και κατά τη διάρκεια της διαδικασίας υποβολής, καθώς αυτό μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε παραγωγικές ανταλλαγές, όπως επίσης και παλαιότερες και ευρύτερες παραπομπές δημοσιευμένων εργασιών (The Effect of Open Access)

Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Βιογραφικά Συγγραφέων
Ελένη Διδασκάλου, Πανεπιστημίο Θεσσαλίας

Associate Professor, Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Greece.

Χριστίνα Ρούση- Βέργου, Πανεπιστημίο Θεσσαλίας

Assistant Professor, Department of Special Education, University of Thessaly, Greece

Αναφορές
Βιβλιογραφία
Briesch, A. M., Chafouleas, S. M., Dineen, J. N., McCoach, D. B., & Donaldson, A. (2021). School building administrator reports of screening practices across academic, behavioral, and physical health domains. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 24, 266-277.
Briesch, A., Chafouleas, S. M., & Chaffee, R. K. (2018). Analysis of state-level guidance regarding school-based universal screening for social, emotional, and behavioural risk. School Mental Health, 10, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-017-9232-5
Burns, J. R., & Rapee, R. M. (2021). Barriers to universal mental health screening in schools: The perspective of school psychologists. Journal of Applied School Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2021.1941470
Casale, G., Volpe, R. J., Daniels, B., Hennemann, T., Briesch, A. M., & Grosche, M. (2019). Measurement invariance of a universal behavioral screener across samples from the USA and Germany. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34, 87-100.
Catalano, R., Hawkins, D., Berglund, M., Pollard, J., & Arthur, A. (2002). Prevention science and positive youth development: Competitive or cooperative frameworks? Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(6), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00496-2
Caldarella, P., Young, E. L., Richardson, M. J., Young, B. J., & Young, K. R. (2008). Validation of the systematic screening for behavior disorders in middle and junior high schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426607313121
Chatzipanagiotou, P., & Katsarou, E. (2023). Crisis management, school leadership in disruptive times and the recovery of schools in the post COVID-19 era: A systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020118
Chin, J. C., Dowdy, E., & Quirk, M. P. (2013). Universal screening in middle school: Examining the behavioral and emotional screening system. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(1), 53-60. doi: 10.1177/0734282912448137
Cook, C. R., Volpe, R. J., & Livanis, A. (2010). Constructing a roadmap for future universal screening research beyond academics. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(4), 197–205.
Condliffe, B., Zhu, P., Doolittle, F., Van Dok, M., Power, H., & Denison, D. (2022). Study of training in Multi-tiered systems of support for behavior: impacts on elementary school students’ outcomes. Institute of Education Research. Evaluation Report. U.S. Department of Education. NCEE2022-008r.
Cook, C. R., Volpe, R. J., & Livanis, A. (2010). Constructing a roadmap for future universal screening research beyond academics. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(4), 197–205.
Cortés-Ramos A., & Landa-Blanco, M. (2021). Universal Screening in Positive School Mental Health Using the ASEBA Methodology for Teachers: A Pilot Epidemiological Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(22), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211807
Demissie, Z., & Brener, N. (2017). Mental health and social services in schools: Variations by school characteristics, United States, 2014. Mental Health and Prevention, 5, 5–11.
Didaskalou, E., Briesch, A., Volpe, R., & Roussi-Vergou, C. (in press). A preliminary investigation of the factor structure of the Greek language version of the Integrated Teacher Rating Form (ITRF-GR). Contemporary School Psychology.
Didaskalou, E., Briesch, A. M., Volpe, R. J., & Roussi-Vergou, C. (2023). A preliminary investigation of the psychometric properties of the Integrated Teacher Rating Form (ITRF) in Greek school children. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2023.2252374
Didaskalou, E., Briesch, A.,Volpe, R., & Roussi-Vergou, C. (2020). Psychometric properties of the classroom observation of engagement, disruptive, and disrespectful behavior (COEDD) in Greek school children. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1776180
Didaskalou, E., Volpe, R. J., Briesch, A. M., & Roussi-Vergou, C. (2021). Integrated Teacher Rating Form-Greek version (ITRF-GR).
Doll, B., & Cummings, J. (2008). Best practices in population-based school mental health services. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1333–1347). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Dowdy, E., Furlong, M., Raines, T. C., Bovery, B., Kauffman, B., Kamphaus, R. W., Dever, B., Price, M., & Murdock, J. (2015). Enhancing school-based mental health services with a preventive and promotive approach to universal screening for complete mental health. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25(2-3), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.929951
Dowdy, E., Dever, B. V., Raines, T. C., & Moffa, K. (2016). A preliminary investigation into the added value of multiple gates and informants in universal screening for behavioral and emotional risk. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 32(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15377903.2016.1165327
Dowdy, E., Ritchley, K., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2010). School-based screening: A population-based approach to inform and monitor children’s mental health. School Mental Health, 2, 166-176. doi10.1007/s12310-010-9036-3
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Eklund, K., Kilgus, S., Von der Embse, N., Beardmore, M., & Tanner, N. (2017). Use of universal screening scores to predict distal academic and behavioral outcomes: A multilevel approach. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000355
Eklund, K., Renshaw, T. L., Dowdy, E., Jimerson, S. R., Hart, S. R., Jones, C., N., & Earhart, J. (2009). Early identification of behavioural and emotional problems in youth: Universal screening versus teacher-referral identification. The California School Psychologists, 14, 89-95.
Eklund, K., Tanner, N., Stoll, K., & Anyway, L. (2015). Identifying emotional and behavioural risk among gifted and nongifted children: A multi-gate, multi-informant approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(2), 197-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000080
Ellis, W. E., Dumas, T. M., & Forbes, L. M. (2020). Physically isolated but socially connected: Psychological adjustment and stress among adolescents during the initial COVID-19 crisis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 52(3), 177.
Fabiano, G. A., & Evans, S. W. (2019). Introduction to the special issue of school mental health on best practices in effective multi-tiered intervention frameworks. School Mental Health, 11, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9283-2
Fazel, M. S., Hoagwood, K., Stephan, S., & Ford, T. (2014). Mental health interventions in schools in high-income countries. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(5), 377–387. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70312-8
Feeney-Kettler, K. A., Kratochwill, T. R., Kaizer, A. P., Hemmeter, M. L., & Kettler, R. (2010). Screening young children’s risk for mental health problems: A review of four measures. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(4), 218-230.
doi: 10.1177/1534508410380557
Fernandez, E., & Johnson, S. (2016). Anger in psychological disorders: Prevalence, presentation, etiology and prognostic implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 46, 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.012
Giannopoulou, I., Efstathiou, V., Triantafyllou, G., Korkoliakou, P., & Douzenis, A. (2021). Adding stress to the stressed: Senior high school students' mental health amidst the COVID-19 nationwide lockdown in Greece. Psychiatry Research, 295(113), 560.
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Child Psychology, Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38, 581-586.
Grosche, M., & Volpe, R. J. (2013). Response-to-intervention (RTI) as a model to facilitate inclusion for students with learning and behavior problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08856257.2013.768452
Harrison, J., Vannest, K., & Reynolds, C. (2013). Social acceptability of five screening instruments for social, emotional and behavioral challenges. Behavioral Disorders, 38(3), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303800305
Hoagwood, K.E., Gardner, W., & Kelleher, K. J. (2021). Promoting children’s mental, emotional, and behavioral (MEB) health in all public systems, post-COVID-19. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 48, 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-021-01125-7
Jamieson, K. H., & Robemer, D. (2005). A call to action on adolescent mental health. In D. L. Evans, E. B. Foa, R. E. Gur, H. Hendin, C. P. O’Brien, M. E. P. Seligman, & B. T. Walsh (Eds.), Treating and preventing adolescent mental health disorders: What we know and what we don’t know (pp. 598–615). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780195173642.003.0033
Johnson, S., Dalton Locke, C., Juan, N., Foye, U., Oram, S., Papamichail, A., Landau, S., Olive, R., Jeynes, T., Prisha, S., Rains, L., Lloyd Evans, B., Carr, S., Killaspy, H., Gillard, S., Simpson, A., (2021). Impact on mental health care and on mental health service users of the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods survey of UK mental health care staff. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 56, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01927-4
Kilgus, S. P., & Eklund, K. R. (2016). Consideration of base rates within universal screening for behavioural and emotional risk: A novel procedural framework. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 10(1), 120-30.
Kilgus, S. P., Kazmerski, J. S., Taylor, C. N., & von der Embse, N. P. (2017). Use of direct behavior ratings to collect functional assessment data. School Psychology Quarterly, 32, 240–253. doi:10.1037/spq0000156
Kilpatrick, K., Maras, M., Brann, K., & Kilgus, S. (2018). Universal screening for social, emotional, and behavioral risk in students: DESSA-mini risk stability over time and its implications for screening procedures. School Psychology Review, 47(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR- 2017-0069.V47-3
Koutrouba, K. (2012). A profile of the effective teacher: Greek secondary education teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 359-374. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2011.654332
Lane, K. L., Menzies, H. M., Oakes, W. P., & Kalberg, J. R. (Eds.). (2012). Systematic screening of behavior to support instruction: From preschool to high school. Guilford Press.
Mahoney, M. (2020). Implementing evidence-based practices within multi-tiered systems of support to promote inclusive secondary classroom settings. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 9(1), 1-13.
Magklara, K., Lazaratou, H., Barbouni, A., Poulas, K., & Farsalinos, K. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on children’s and adolescents’ mental health in Greece. Children & Society, 37, 469-484. doi: 10.1111/chso.12605
Marsh, R. J., & Marthur, S. R. (2020). Metal health in schools: An overview of multitiered systems of support. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(2), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451220914896
Nikolaidis, A., Paksarian, D., Alexander, L., Derosa, J., Dunn, J., Nielson, D. M., Droney, I., Kang, M., Douka, I., Bromet, E., Milham, M. P., Stringaris, A., & Merikangas, K. R. (2021). The Coronavirus Health and Impact Survey (CRISIS) reveals reproducible correlates of pandemic-related mood states across the Atlantic. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–13.
Oliver, E., Galand, B., Morin, A., & Hospel, V. (2021). Need-supportive teaching and student engagement in the classroom: Comparing the additive, synergistic and global contributions. Learning and Instruction, 71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101389
O’neill, R. E., Bundock, K., Kladis, K., & Hawken, L. S. (2015). Acceptability of Functional Behavioral Assessment Procedures to Special Educators and School Psychologists. Behavioral Disorders, 41(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-41.1.51
Patalay, P., Fitzsimons, E. (2018). Development and predictors of mental ill-health and wellbeing from childhood to adolescence. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology 53, 1311–1323 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1604-0
Raines, T. C., Dever, B. V., Kamphaus, R. W., & Roach, A. T. (2012). Universal screening for behavioral and emotional risk: A promising method for reducing disproportionate placement in special education. The Journal of Negro Education, 81(3), 283-296. http://www.jstor.com/stable/10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.3.0283
Reinke, W. M., & Herman, K. C. (2016). Using Brief Assessments of Important Indicators to Inform School-Based Interventions and Practice. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(1), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508416667691
Robinson, J., Pan Yuen, H., Martin, C., Hughes, A., Baksheev, G. N., Dodd, S., Bapat, S., Schwass, W., McGorry, P., & Yung, A. R. (2011). Does screening high school students for psychological distress, deliberate self-harm, or suicidal ideation cause distress-and is it acceptable? An Australian-based study. Crisis, 32(5), 254–263. doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000087
Roussi-Vergou, C., Andreou, E., & Didaskalou, E. (2020). Greece. In G. Skrzypiec, M. Wyra, & E. Didaskalou (Eds.), A global perspective of young adolescents’ peer aggression and wellbeing: Beyond bullying (pp.195-206). Routledge.
Severson, H. H., Walker, H. M., Hope-Doolittle, J., Kratochwill, T. R., & Gresham, F. M. (2007). Proactive, early screening to detect behaviorally at-risk students: Issues, approaches, emerging innovations, and professional practices. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 193–223. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.003
Simonsen, B., Robbie, K., Meyer, K., Freeman, J., Everett, S., & Feinberg, J. (2021). Multi-Tiered systems of support (MTSS) in the classroom. Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.
Strong, A., Wehby, J. H., & Falk, K. B. (2016). Reading fluency interventions for middle school students with academic and behavioral disabilities. Reading Improvement, 53(2), 53-64.
Splett, J. W., Trainor, K. M., Rabon, A., Halliday-Boykins, C. A., Garzona, M. E., Dongo, M. D., & Wesit, M. D. (2018). Comparison of universal mental health screening to students already receiving intervention in a multitiered system of support. Behavioral Disorders, 43(3), 344-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918761339
Stavroussi, P., Didaskalou, E., & Green, J. G. (2020). Are teachers’ democratic beliefs about classroom life associated with their perceptions of inclusive education? International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. https:// doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1716961
Tanner, N., Eklund, K., Kilgus, S. P., & Johnson, A. H. (2018). Generalizability of universal screening measures for behavioral and emotional risk. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0044.V47-1
Utley, A. A., & Obiakor, F. E. (2015). Special issue: Research perspectives on multi-tiered system of support. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 13(1), 1-3.
Verlenden, J., Naser, S., & Brown, J. (2021). Steps in the Implementation of Universal Screening for Behavioral and Emotional Risk to Support Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Two Case Studies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 37(1), 69-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2020.1780660
Vlachou, A., Didaskalou, E., & Kontofryou, M. (2015). Roles, duties and challenges of special/support teachers at secondary education: Implications for promoting inclusive practices. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(4), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1060073
Volpe, R. J., Yeung, T. S., Casale, G., Krull, J., Briesch, A. M., & Henneman, T. (2021). Evaluation of a German language school-based universal screening for student social, emotional, and behavioral risk. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9, 10-20.
Volpe, R. J., & Briesch, A. M. (2020). Integrated System Teacher Rating Form. Authors.
Volpe, R., & Briesch, A. (2018). Establishing evidence-based behavioral screening practices in U.S. schools. School Psychology Review, 47(4), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2018-0047.V47-4
Volpe, R. J., & Briesch, A. M. (2016). Dependability of two scaling approaches to direct behavior rating multi-item scales assessing disruptive classroom behavior. School Psychology Review, 45(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.17105/ SPR45-1.39-52
Von der Embse, N. P., Stephen P., Kilgus, K., Eklund, E. A., & Levi-Neilsen, S. (2018). Training teachers to facilitate early identification of mental and behavioral health risks. School Psychology Review, 47(4), 372-384.doi: 10.17105/ SPR-2017-0094.V47-4
Walker, H. M., Nishioka, V. M., Zeller, R., Severson, H. H., & Feil, E. G. (2014). Causal factors and potential solutions for the persistent under-identification of students having emotional or behavioral disorders in the context of schooling. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26, 29–40.
Whitley, S., & Cuenca-Carlino, Y. (2020). Examining the technical adequacy of the social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46 (1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508419857225
Witt, J. C., Elliot, S., & Martens, B. K. (2017). Republication of
“Acceptablility of behavioral interventions used in classrooms: The influence of amount of teacher time, severity of behavior problem, and type of intervention”. Behavioral Disorders, 43(1), 262-268. doi:10.1177/0198742917736794
Yeung, T. S., Volpe, R. J., & Briesch, A. M. (2019). Reliability and validity of a Chinese language universal behavioral screener. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 8, 80-9