The main aspects of the application of educational technologies in the study process


Δημοσιευμένα: Jan 1, 2015
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
Ίδρυμα τριτοβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης Καινοτόμος δραστηριότητα Εκπαιδευτική τεχνολογία
Leta Dromantienė
Valdonė Indrašienė
Τζένη Παγγέ
Erika Bielskytė-Simanavičienė
Περίληψη

Rapidly changing economic, social and political conditions, the penetration of new technologies also requires a completely different type of the university lecturers who are innovation-friendly. They must have relevant knowledge and combine didactic technologies and information and communication technologies in order that they would be able to give students an opportunity to study in an innovative and effective way. Taking into consideration that the study process is always based on a certain technology and paying attention to the shift of education paradigms, it can be established that, in the modern study process, it is extremely important to realise precisely today's educational objectives and principles which assist in implementing up-to-date educational technologies. The study is aimed at establishing what most important factors of the application of educational technologies in the process of modern studies are. The study is based on a quantitative research methodology the choice of which was determined by the newness of the analyzed problem. The study shows that the objectives of a subject of studies are always discussed with students, the latter also have an opportunity to set their own individual study objectives, they are continuously kept informed why they study concrete knowledge and what it will be needed for in the future. The creation of an environment favourable to studies is also proved by the fact that the opportunity is given to students to combine the content of their studies of a subject with their own personal experience, interests. The study process is dominated by the study process of the active creation and construction of knowledge.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
AECT Standards, 2012 version. [interactive], [accessed 2015-09-12] <http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/aect.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/AECT_Documents/AECT_Standards_adopted7_16_2.pdf>
Anderson, J. (2005) IT, e-learning and teacher development. International Education Journal. [interactive]. 5(5), 1-14. [accessed 2015-02-22] <http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ903883.pdf>.
Barnet, R., Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
Bastic, M., Leskovar-Spacapan, G. 2006. What do transition organizations lack to be innovative. Kybernetes. 35(7/8), 36-45.
Bitinas, B. (2010) Gyvenimas ugdymo verpetuose. Klaipėda: Klaipėdos universiteto leidykla.
Brown, D., Warschauer, M. (2006). From the university to the elementary classroom: Students’ experiences in learning to integrate technology in instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 599-621.
Butkevičienė, E. (2009) Social Innovations in Rural Communities: Methodological Framework and Empirical Evidence. Social Sciences. 1(63), 80-88.
Creswell J. W. (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications
Dromantienė, L., Indrašienė, V., Merfeldaitė, O., Prakapas, R. (2013) Teachers’ professional development : the case of Lithuania. // A journal of research in education and training University of Ioannina publications. Ioannina : University of Ioannina, 6, 202-216.
Fredriksson, U., Gajek, E., Jedeskog, G. (2009) Ways to use ICTin schools to optimize the impact on teaching and learning. Acta Didactica Napocensia. 2 (4), 21-32.
Flick, U. (2009) An introduction to Qualitative Research. Fourth edition. SAGE Publications Ltd
Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Wu, J. (2009). Developing a better understanding of technology-based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 714-730.
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246-259.
Havelock, R., Hamilton, J. L. (2004) Guiding Change in Special Education. How to Help Schools With New Ideas and Practices. Corwin Press.
Hayashi, E. C. S., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2013). Affectibility in Educational Technologies: A Socio-Technical Perspective for Design. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (1), 57–68.
Ilomäki, L. (2008) The effects of ICT on school: teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Turun Yliopisto : Turku.
Indrašienė, V., Merfeldaitė, O., Railienė, A., Jegelevičienė, V. (2015) Experience in using information communication technology during lessons in general education schools. // The new educational review. Toruń : Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. 40(2 97-108.
Indrašienė, V., Sadauskas, J. (2013 The key attitudes towards organization of Bachelor's level studies. // EIIC 2013: proceedings in electronic international interdisciplinary conference, 2-6 September 2013 Žilina: EDIS - Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina.. 2, 551-556.
Youssef, B. A., Mounir, D. (2008) The Impact of ICT on Student Performance in Higher Education: Direct Effects, Indirect Effects and Organizational Change. The Economics of E-learning [interactive].5(1), 45-56 [accessed 2015-11-01]. < http://www.uoc.edu/rusc/5/1/dt/eng/benyoussef_dahmani.pdf >
Longworth, N. (2000).Making Lifelong Learning Work: Learning Cities for a Learning Century. London: Kogan Page.
Luckin, R., Blight, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, Sh., Crook, Ch., Noss R.( 2012) Decoding Learning: The Proof, Promise and Potential of Digital Education. [interactive]. [accessed 2015-11-02]. http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/decoding-learning
Luppicini, R. (2005). A Systems Definition of Educational Technology in Society. Educational Technology & Society. [interactive]. 8 (3),103-109. [accessed 2015-11-02]. http://www.ifets.info/journals/8_3/10.pdf
Patankar, P., S., Jadhav, M., S (2013) Role of teachers’ in curriculum development for teacher education [interactive]. [accessed 2015-10-17] <http://www.researchgate.net/publication/258023165_ROLE_OF_TEACHERS_IN_CURRICULUM_DEVELOPMENT_FOR_TEACHER_EDUCATION>
Rastauskienė, G. J. and kt. (2008) Aš koncepcija: kognityviojo komponento raiška tarp Lietuvos aukštųjų mokyklų dėstytojų. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia. 20(3),,12-31.
Ross, S. M (2010). Educational Technology Research Past and Present: Balancing Rigor and Relevance to Impact School Learning. Contemporary Educational Technology [interactive]. 1 (1), 17-35 [accessed 2015-10-17] < http://www.cedtech.net/articles/11/112.pdf>
Sessoms, D.(2008) Interactive instruction: Creating interactive learning environments through tomorrow’s teachers. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4 (2), 86-96.
Shavinina, L. V., Seeratan K. L. (2003) On the nature of individual innovation. International Handbook on Innovation Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science. 31-43.
Spector, J.M., Merrill ,M.D. (2008) Special issue: Effective, efficient and engaging (E³) learning in a digital age. Distance Education. 29 (2), 123 -126.
Stoll L., Fink D. (1998) Keičiame mokyklą. Vilnius: Margi raštai.
Šiaučiukienė L., Čiužas R., Pedagogų didaktinės kompetencijos raiška Lietuvos mokyklose // Pedagogika. 2007, 86, 23-29
Zhu, Ch. (2010) Teacher roles and adoption of educational technology in the Chinese context. Journal for Educational Research Online. [interactive]. 2, 72–86 [accessed 2015-10-01] <http://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2011/4576/pdf/JERO_2010_2_Zhu_Teacher_roles_and_adoption_of_educational_S72_D_A.pdf >
Τα περισσότερο διαβασμένα άρθρα του ίδιου συγγραφέα(s)