Simultaneous Interpreting and AI Text-Mediated Output A Comparative Analysis of English–Greek Institutional Discourse
Published:
Feb 20, 2026
Keywords:
artificial intelligence simultaneous interpreting speech translation communicative adequacy
Abstract
This study investigates how closely AI-based text-mediated output approximates professional human simultaneous interpreting with respect to target-language output characteristics in a high-stakes institutional context. Using three plenary speeches from the European Parliament, it compares official Greek simultaneous interpretation with AI-generated Greek output produced via a neural machine translation system. The analysis combines proposition-level error annotation with qualitative discourse-oriented analysis. While the AI output displays fewer overall errors, it shows systematic limitations in pragmatic appropriateness, evaluative intensity, terminology, and stylistic naturalness. Human interpreting, by contrast, demonstrates greater sensitivity to contextual cues and audience-oriented reformulation, despite strategic information compression.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Ioannidis, A. (2026). Simultaneous Interpreting and AI Text-Mediated Output: A Comparative Analysis of English–Greek Institutional Discourse. International Journal of Language, Translation and Intercultural Communication, 11, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.12681/ijltic.44104
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., Russo, M., Collard, C. & Defrancq, B. (2018). Building interpreting and intermodal corpora: a how-to for a formidable task. In M. Russo, C. Bendazzoli & B. Defrancq (eds) Making way in corpus-based interpreting studies (pp. 21-42). Singapore: Springer.
Cao, Y. (2024). Comparative analysis of machine interpreting and human interpreting: Insights into consecutive interpreting teaching. In M. F. b. Sedon, I. A. Khan, M. C. Birkök & K. S. Chan (eds), Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (pp. 730-741). Paris: Atlantis Press.
Cela Gutiérrez, C. (2025). AI-assisted Interpreting: Valuable Tool for Professional Interpreters or Job Displacement? Traduction et Langues, 24 (1), 263-281.
Fantinuoli C. (2022). Conference interpreting and new technologies. In Michaela Albl-Mikasa and Elisabet Tiselius (eds), Routledge Handbook of Conference Interpreting (pp. 508-522). New York: Routledge.
Fantinuoli, C. (2019). The technological turn in interpreting: The challenges that lie ahead. In W. Baur & F. Mayer (eds) Proceedings of the Conference Übersetzen und Dolmetschen 4.0 – Neue Wege im digitalen Zeitalter. (pp. 334-354). Berlin: BDÜ Fachverlag.
Fantinuoli, C. and Prandi, B. (2021). Towards the evaluation of automatic simultaneous speech translation from a communicative perspective. In M. Federico, A. Waibel, M. R. Costa-jussà, J. Niehues, S. Stuker, & E. Salesky (eds), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Spoken Language Translation (pp. 245-254). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Horváth, I. (2021). Speech translation vs. Interpreting. Language Studies and Modern Humanities, 3(2), 174–187. Berlin: Russian State Pedagogical University Herzen.
Lee, J.-H. & Cha, K.-W. (2023). Human interpretation and machine translations based upon interviews with director Joon-ho Bong. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 23, 204-219.
Liu, Y. & Liang, J. (2024). Multidimensional comparison of Chinese–English interpreting outputs from human and machine: Implications for interpreting education in the machine-translation age. Linguistics and Education, 80, 101273, 1-13.
Lu, X.-L. & Han, C. (2023). Automatic assessment of spoken-language interpreting based on machine-translation evaluation metrics: A multi-scenario exploratory study. Interpreting: International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 25(1), 109-143. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nimdzi (2019). The Nimdzi Interpreting Index. [Online]. Available at: https://www.nimdzi.com/the-2019-nimdzi-interpreting-index/ (accessed 02.01.2026).
Peeters, K., Daems, J., Plieseis, C., Rivas Ginel, M. I., Şahin, M. (2025). AI for Translation and Interpreting. A Roadmap for Users and Policy Makers. Conseil Européen pour les Langues / European Language Council.
Russo, M. (2019). Corpus-based studies in conference interpreting. Slovo.ru: Baltijskij accent, 10(1), 87-100.
Sperber, M., de Seyssel, M., Bao, J., & Paulik, M. (2025). Toward Machine Interpreting: Lessons from Human Interpreting Studies. In C. Christodoulopoulos, T. Chakraborty, C. Rose & V. Peng (eds), Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 23349–23364). Suzhou, China: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Tan, Y. L. & Gao, L. (2025). Pointing to context from a Relevance Theory perspective: A comparative study of human and machine interpreting. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 16(3), 1-14.
Tiselius, E. (2009). Revisiting Carroll’s scales. In C. V. Angelelli & H. E. Jacobson (eds), Testing and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies (pp. 95-121). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
