Μια Διδακτική Παρέμβαση για την Ενίσχυση της Συμμετοχής των Μαθητών στη Μάθηση της Έννοιας της Ενέργειας

¨Έρευνα για την Εκπαίδευση στις Φυσικές Επιστήμες και την Τεχνολογία, Τόμος 4, Αρ. 1 (2024)
PDF
Δημοσιευμένα: dic 29, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/riste.37364
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
διδασκαλία της ενέργειας, ενίσχυση της συμμετοχής στη μάθηση, συμμετοχή και μάθηση στη φυσική, φυσική γυμνασίου
Γεωργία Τόλη
Μαρία Καλλέρη
Περίληψη

Η παρούσα εργασία παρουσιάζει μια παρέμβαση που είχε στόχο την ενίσχυση της συμμετοχής των μαθητών στη μάθηση της έννοιας της ενέργειας και την επίτευξη επιθυμητών μαθησιακών αποτελεσμάτων. Η παρέμβαση περιλάμβανε ειδικά σχεδιασμένες δραστηριότητες και στρατηγικές διδασκαλίας και εφαρμόστηκε σε 110 μαθητές γυμνασίου (πειραματική ομάδα) έναντι μιας ομάδας ελέγχου 96 μαθητών. Μετά την εφαρμογή, στους μαθητές και των δύο ομάδων δόθηκε ένα ερωτηματολόγιο αυτοαναφοράς για τη μέτρηση της συμμετοχής. Για την αξιολόγηση των μαθησιακών αποτελεσμάτων των μαθητών χορηγήθηκε και στις δύο ομάδες ένα γραπτό ερωτηματολόγιο αποτελούμενο από ερωτήσεις ανοιχτού τύπου. Οι αναλύσεις δεδομένων έδειξαν σημαντικά υψηλότερα επίπεδα συμμετοχής και καλύτερα μαθησιακά αποτελέσματα μεταξύ των μαθητών της πειραματικής ομάδας σε σύγκριση με αυτούς της ομάδας ελέγχου. Επιπλέον, βρέθηκε μια σημαντική θετική συσχέτιση μεταξύ της συμμετοχής και της ακαδημαϊκής επιτυχίας. Αυτή η μελέτη επιβεβαιώνει τις απόψεις άλλων ερευνητών όπου τα υψηλά επίπεδα συμμετοχής συνδέονται με την απόκτηση γνώσεων και δεξιοτήτων, που με τη σειρά τους οδηγούν σε θετικά ακαδημαϊκά αποτελέσματα.


 

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρο Ερευνητικό

Οι συγγραφείς διατηρούν τα πνευματικά δικαιώματα και παρέχουν στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης μαζί με την αδειοδότηση της εργασίας με CC-BY-NC-SA, που επιτρέπει σε άλλους να μοιράζονται αυτή την εργασία με αναγνώριση του συγγραφικού δικαιώματος και την αρχική δημοσίευση σε αυτό το περιοδικό.

Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Βιογραφικό Συγγραφέα
Μαρία Καλλέρη
Αναφορές
Αντωνίου, Ν., Δημητριάδης, Π., Καμπούρης, Κ., Παπαμιχαήλ, Κ., & Παπατσίμπα, Λ. (2012). Φυσική Β’ Γυμνασίου. Διόφαντος.
Adodo, S.O. & Gbore, L.O. (2012). Prediction of attitude and interest of science students of different ability on their academic performance in basic science. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 4, 68-72. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPC10.049
Agra, G., Formiga, N.S., Oliveira, P.S., Costa, M.M.L., Fernandes, M.G.M., Nóbrega, M.M.L. (2019). Analysis of the concept of Meaningful Learning in light of the Ausubel’s Theory. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 72, 248-255. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0691
Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Kelley, K. (2012). Longitudinal Analysis of the Relations Between Opportunities to Learn About Science and the Development of Interests Related to Science. Science Education, 96 (5), 763-786. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21018
Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø, Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88(5), 683-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10141
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S.,L., Kim, D.,& Reschly A.,L. ( 2006). Measuring Cognitive and Psychological Engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44 (5), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S., & Furlong, M., J., (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools 45(5), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1975–1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802425581
Bergin, D.A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34, 87-98. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_2
Britner S. L. & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
Chen, J. A., & Usher, E. L. (2013). Profiles of the sources of science self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.11.002
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). The Paradox of Achievement. Στο J. Aronson (Επίμ.), Improving Academic Achievement, σ. 61-87. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012064455-1/50007-5
Djudin, T. (2018). How to Cultivate Students’ Interests in Physics: A Challenge for Senior High School Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains 6 (1), 16-22.
Dorfman, B. S., & Fortus, D. (2019). Students’ self-efficacy for science in different school systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(8), 1037-1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21542
Fasli, M. & Michalakopoulos, M. (2005). Supporting active learning through game-like exercises. Στο P. Goodyear, D.G. Sampson, D.J-T. Yang, Kinshuk, T. Okamoto, R. Hartley, & N-S. Chen, Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’05), σ. 730-734. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2005.247
Feldman, D. B., & Kubota, M. (2015). Hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and academic achievement: Distinguishing constructs and levels of specificity in predicting college grade-point average. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.022
Fencl, H., & Scheel, K. (2005). Engaging Students: An Examination of the Effects of Teaching Strategies on Self-Efficacy and Course Climate in a Nonmajors Physics Course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1), 20.
Folorunsho, A. I. (2016). Young Children’s Engagement and Interactions with Digital and Non-Digital Activities: A Case Study. https://repository.canterbury.ac.uk/item/88319/young-children-s-engagement-andinteractions-with-digital-and-non-digital-activities-a-case-study.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
Furlong, M. J., Whipple, A. D., Jean, G. St., Simental, J., Soliz, A., and Punthuna, S. (2003). Multiple Contexts of School Engagement: Moving Toward a Unifying Framework for Educational Research and Practice. The California School Psychologist, 8 (1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03340899
Guay, F. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulations types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211055355
Hatzikraniotis, E., Kallery, M., Molohidis, T. Psillos, D. (2011). Students’ design of experiments: an inquiry module on the conduction of heat. Physics Education, 45, (4), 336-344. http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/45/4/002
Hazari, Z., Cass, C., & Beattie, C. (2015). Obscuring power structures in the physics classroom: Linking teacher positioning, student engagement, and physics identity development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 735-762. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21214
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in science education, 40(5), 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
Jewett, J.W., Jr. (2008). Energy and the confused student I: Work. The Physics Teacher, 46(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2823999
Johnstone, A. H. & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory; some thoughts from the literature. University chemistry education, 5(2), 42-51.
Kallery, M., Sofianidis, A., Pationioti, P., Tsialma, K., & Katsiana, X. (2022): Cognitive style, motivation and learning in inquiry-based early-years science activities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 30(4), 907-924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2022.2052819.
Lam, S.-F., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. Στο S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Επιμ.), Handbook of research on student engagement, σ. 403-419. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_19.
Lavonen, J. (2008). Learning and the Use of ICT in Science Education. Στο P. Demkanin, B. Kibble, J. Lavonen, J. Guitart Mas, & J. Turlo (Επιμ.), Effective Use of ICT in Science Education, σ. 6-28. University of Edinburgh. ISBN: 978-0-9559665-0-7
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T., & Koskey, K. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001.
Martin, A. J., Way, J., Bobis, J., & Anderson, J. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of math engagement in the middle school years. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 199e244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529365
Millar, R. (2014). Teaching about Energy: From Every day to Scientific Understandings. School Science Review, 96(354), 45-50.
National Research Council (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-18523-3
Oon, P., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). On the declining interest in physics among students—From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 727-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.500338
Pavlin-Bernardić, N., Putarek, V., Rovan, D., Petričević, E. & Vlahović-Štetić, V. (2017). Students’ engagement in learning physics: A subject-specific approach. Στο I. Burić (Επιμ.), 20th Psychology days in Zadar: Book of selected proceedings, σ. 193-203. University of Zadar. ISBN: 978-953-331-175-3
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic Emotions and Student Engagement. Στο S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Επιμ.), Handbook of research on student engagement, σ. 259-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12
Petričević, E., Rovan D., & Pavlin-Bernardić N. (2022). Contextual and individual determinants of engagement in physics from the perspective of elementary school physics teachers, International Journal of Science Education, 44(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2078518
Reeve, J., & Lee W. (2014). Students’ Classroom Engagement Produces Longitudinal Changes in Classroom Motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 106(2), 527. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034934
Renninger, K.A. & Hidi, S. (2015). The Power of Interest for Motivation and Engagement. Routledge. ISBN: 9781138779792
Richardson, A. (2019, June). Developing self-efficacy in the physics classroom through hands-on projects. Στο G. Cohran, C. Singh, & N. Wilkin, AIP Conference Proceedings, σ. 120004-1-120004-3. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5110148
Salmela-Aro, K., & Upadyaya, K. (2014). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands–resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12018
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. Στο S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Επιμ.), Handbook of research on student engagement, σ. 21-44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Smetana, L.K.; Bell, R.L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370.
Toli, G. & Kallery, M. (2021). Enhancing Student Interest to Promote Learning in Science: The Case of the Concept of Energy. Education Sciences, 11, 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050220.
Tural, G. (2011). Amazing physics: Learning about work, energy, and projectile motion in a historical context. Physics Education, 48(3), 336. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/46/3/012
Wahyuningsih, S., Nurjanah, N.E., Rasmani, U.E.E., Hafidah, R., Pudyaningtyas, A.R., Syamsuddin, M.M. (2020). STEAM learning in early childhood education: A literature review. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 4(1), 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v4i1.39855
Wallace, T. L., Sung, H. C., & Williams, J. D. (2014). The defining features of teacher talk within autonomy-supportive classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 42(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.04.005
Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and individual differences, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004.
Wang, M., & Degol. J. (2014). Staying Engaged: Knowledge and Research Needs in Student Engagement. Child development perspectives, 8(3), 137-143. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/cdep.12073
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008
Zeyer, A., Bölsterli, K., Brovelli, D., & Odermatt, F. (2012). Brain Type or Sex Differences? A Structural Equation Model of the Relation Between Brain Type, Sex, and Motivation to Learn Science. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (5), 779-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.635165
Zeyer, A., Çetin-Dindar, A., Md Zain, A. N., Juriševič, M., Devetak, I., & Odermatt, F. (2013). Systemizing: A Cross-Cultural Constant for Motivation to Learn Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50 (9), 1047-1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21101