Opportunity to learn in reading comprehension: insights from PIRLS 2021 results.

pdf (English)
Δημοσιευμένα: Mar 1, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/ppej.40304
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
ευκαιρία μάθησης διδακτικές πρακτικές δικαιοσύνη μελέτες μεγάλης κλίμακας
Virginie Dupont
University of Liège
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2607-2465
Schillings Patricia
University of Liège
Pressia Fabian
University of Liège
André Marine
University of Liège
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-5334
Περίληψη

For several years, the question of equity within education systems has been the subject of debate. From this perspective, it is essential to question how all students, regardless of their personal characteristics or level of competence, receive (or do not receive) the same chances to develop their skills. This refers directly to the concept of opportunities to learn (OTL), defined in terms of curricular coverage, but also of teaching practices. This article focuses on the content emphasis dimension of the OTL concept as measured through the PIRLS 2021 survey in the Wallonia-Brussels Federation. Through 9 items of this survey, we investigated whether teaching practices differ according to the average level of students within classes. The analyses carried out show that, in lower-level classes, teachers modify their teaching practices, exposing students less frequently to long, resistant texts and inviting them less often to engage in complex tasks or tasks that work on high-level cognitive processes. These differences in terms of OTL according to the level of the pupils do not enable the weakest among them to develop their reading skills in the best possible way, and run counter to the compensatory justice perspective that is so popular in education systems (as provided).

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Creative Commons License

Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το CC Αναφορά Δημιουργού – Μη Εμπορική Χρήση – Παρόμοια Διανομή 4.0.

Οι συγγραφείς των άρθρων που δημοσιεύονται στο ΠΡΟΣΧΟΛΙΚΗ & ΣΧΟΛΙΚΗ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ διατηρούν τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας επί των άρθρων τους, δίνοντας στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης. Άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στο ΠΡΟΣΧΟΛΙΚΗ & ΣΧΟΛΙΚΗ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ διατίθενται με άδεια Creative Commons 3.0 και σύμφωνα με την άδεια μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται ελεύθερα, με αναφορά στο/στη συγγραφέα και στην πρώτη δημοσίευση για μη κερδοσκοπικούς σκοπούς και με δικαίωμα τροποποίησης μόνον με παρόμοια διανομή (αν αναμείξετε, τροποποιήσετε, ή δημιουργήσετε πάνω στο υλικό, πρέπει να διανείμετε τις δικές σας συνεισφορές υπό την ίδια άδεια όπως και το πρωτότυπο). To Εργαστήριο Παιδαγωγικών Ερευνών και Εφαρμογών του Παιδαγωγικού Τμήματος Προσχολικής Εκπαίδευσης του Πανεπιστημίου Κρήτης και το Εθνικό Κέντρο Τεκμηρίωσης διατηρούν το δικαίωμα να δημοσιεύουν, να αναπαραγάγουν, να παρουσιάζουν στο κοινό, να διανέμουν και χρησιμοποιούν άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στο ΠΡΟΣΧΟΛΙΚΗ & ΣΧΟΛΙΚΗ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ σε οποιοδήποτε μέσο και μορφή είτε μεμονωμένα είτε ως μέρη συλλογικών  έργων, για όλο το χρόνο διάρκειας προστασίας της πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας και για όλες τις χώρες του κόσμου. Αυτό περιλαμβάνει ενδεικτικά και όχι αποκλειστικά, το δικαίωμα δημοσίευσης των άρθρων σε τεύχη του περιοδικού ΠΡΟΣΧΟΛΙΚΗ & ΣΧΟΛΙΚΗ ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ, αναπαραγωγής και διανομής μεμονωμένων αντιγράφων των άρθρων, αναπαραγωγής ολόκληρων των άρθρων σε άλλη έκδοση του Εργαστηρίου Παιδαγωγικών Ερευνών και Εφαρμογών του Παιδαγωγικού Τμήματος Προσχολικής Εκπαίδευσης του Πανεπιστημίου Κρήτης και του Εθνικού Κέντρου Τεκμηρίωσης και αναπαραγωγής και διανομής των άρθρων ή περίληψης αυτών με χρήση πληροφορικού συστήματος αποθετηρίου.

Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Bautier E., & Rayou, P. (2009). Learning inequalities. Programmes, pratiques et malentendus scolaires. Presses Universitaires de France.
Bautier, E., & Goigoux, R. (2004). Difficultés d'apprentissage, processus de secondarisation et pratiques enseignantes : une hypothèse relationnelle. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 148, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.2004.3252
Baye, A., Fagnant, A., Hindryckx, G., Lafontaine, D., Matoul, A., & Quittre, V. (2009). Les compétences des jeunes de 15 ans en Communauté française en sciences, en mathématiques et en lecture. Results from the PISA 2006 survey. Cahiers des Sciences de l'Education, 29-30, 3-245.
Berardo, S. A. (2006). The use of authentic materials in the teaching of reading. The reading matrix, 6(2), 60-69. https://readingmatrix.com/articles/berardo/article.pdf
Bianco, M. (2023). La compréhension de l’écrit et son développement : de multiples habiletés en interaction. A.N.A.E., 182, 75-84.
Bilton, C., & Duff, A. (2021). Improving literacy in key stage 2 : Guidance report. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/literacy-ks2
Bonnéry, S. (2007). Comprendre l'échec scolaire : Élèves en difficultés et dispositifs pédagogiques. La Dispute.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). The three states of cultural capital. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 30(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.3406/arss.1979.2654
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1964). Les héritiers. Les étudiants et la culture. Éditions de Minuit.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction. Éditions De Minuit.
Capin, P., Cho, E., Miciak, J., Roberts, G., & Vaughn, S. (2021). Examining the reading and cognitive profiles of students with significant reading comprehension difficulties. Learn Disabil Q, 44(3), 183 196. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0731948721989973
Caro, D. H., & Mirazchiyski, P. (2012). Socioeconomic gradients in eastern european countries: evidence from PIRLS 2006. European Educational Research Journal, 11, (1), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.96
Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning, Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816306400801
CNESCO (2016). Lire, Comprendre, Apprendre : comment soutenir le développement de compétences en lecture ? Recommandations du jury. https://www.cnesco.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/CCLecture_recommandations_jury.pdf
Coleman, J. S, Campbell, E.Q., Hobson, C.J., McPartland, J., Mood, A.M., Weinfeld, F.D., & York, R.L. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Printing Office.
Creswell, J.W., & Guetterman, D. (2024). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Seventh Edition). Global Edition.
De Coster, S., & Hotyat, F. (1970). La sociologie de l’éducation ? Éditions de l’Institut de Sociologie.
Delarue-Breton, C., & Bautier, É. (2019). Littératie scolaire : ambitions exigeantes, difficultés de mise en œuvre. Pratiques, 183-184. 1-13. Doi : https://doi.org/10.4000/ pratiques.7011
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of Education, 189(1 2), 107 122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-208
Felouzis, G. (2014). Les inégalités scolaires. Presses Universitaires de France.
Filderman, M. J., Austin, C. R., Boucher, A. N., O’Donnell, K., & Swanson, E. A. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of reading comprehension interventions on the reading comprehension outcomes of struggling readers in third through 12th grades. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 163 184. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050860
Floden, R. E. (2002). The measurement of opportunity-to-learn. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement. (pp.231-266). National Academies Press.
Fotheringham, J. B. & Creal, D. (1980). Family socioeconomic and educational-emotional characteristics as predictors of school achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 73, (6), 311-317. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00220671.1980.10885258
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to RTI: What, why and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
Gau, S. (1997, March). The distribution and the effects of opportunity to learn on mathematics achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Giasson, J. (2013). La Lecture. De la théorie à la pratique. De Boeck.
Goigoux, R. (1998, January 28). Sept malentendus capitaux [Conference Session]. Forum pour l’école maternelle, Paris, France.
Gustafsson, J.-E, Nilsen, T., & Hansen, K.Y. (2018). School characteristics moderating the relation between student socio-economic status and mathematics achievement in grade 8. Evidence from 50 countries in TIMSS 2011. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 57, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.09.004.
Guthrie, J., & Anderson, E. (1999). Engagement in reading: Processes of motivated strategic, knowledgeable, social readers. In J. Guthrie & D. Alvermann (Éds.), Engaged reading : Processes, practices and policy implications (pp. 17‑45). Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Husen, T. (1967). International Study of Achievement in Mathematics, Volume II. Almqvist & Wiksell.
Kintsch, W. (2013). Revisiting the construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In D.E. Alvermann, N.J. Unrau, & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 807–839). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B.P.M. (2018). Investigating the quality and equity dimensions of educational effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 57, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.005
Lafontaine, D. (2017). Évaluations à large échelle : prendre la juste mesure des effets de contexte. In P. Detroz, M. Crahay, A., & Fagnant (Eds.), L'évaluation à la lumière des contextes et des disciplines (pp. 21-51). Louvain-La-Neuve, De Boeck. https://hdl.handle.net/2268/207443
Lafontaine, D., Baye, A., Vieluf, S., & Monseur, C. (2015). Equity in opportunity-to-learn and achievement in reading: A secondary analysis of PISA 2009 data. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 1 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.05.001
McDonnell, L. M. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164509
Mons, N., (2007). Les Nouvelles Politiques éducatives. Presses Universitaires de France.
Monseur, C., & Lafontaine, D. (2012). Structure des systèmes éducatifs et équité : un éclairage international. In M. Crahay (Eds.), L'école peut-elle être juste et efficace ? De l'égalité des chances à l'égalité des acquis (pp.185-219). De boeck.
Nachbauer, M., & Kyriakides, L. (2020). A review and evaluation of approaches to measure equity in educational outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31 (2), 306-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1672757
OECD (2023), Equity and Inclusion in Education: Finding Strength through Diversity. OECD Publishing https://doi.org/10.1787/e9072e21-en.
OECD, (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en
Rochex, J.-Y., & Crinon, J. (2011). La construction des inégalités scolaires. Au cœur des pratiques et des dispositifs d'enseignement. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The Transactional Theory of reading and writing. In R. Dans Ruddell, M. Ruddell, & H. Si Singer (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (4th ed., pp. 1057-1092). International Reading Association.
Rowan, B., & Correnti, R. (2009). Studying reading instruction with teacher logs: Lessons from the study of instructional improvement. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 120 131. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332375
Rubie-Davies, C.M. (2007). Classroom interactions: exploring the practices of high- and low-expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 289-306. doi: 10.1348/000709906X101601
Scherff, L., & Piazza, C. L. (2008). Why now, more than ever, we need to talk about opportunity to learn. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(4), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.4.7
Schillings, P., & André, M. (2019). S’essayer à l’enseignement explicite d’une démarche d’interprétation : Composer avec des conceptions acquises en formation initiale. Caractères, 59, 55‑71.
Schillings, P., André, M., & Dupont, V. (2023). Performances en lecture et pratiques de classe en Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles : L’urgence d’enseigner des stratégies de régulation, d’interprétation et d’évaluation. NEXUS, 3(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.14428/nexus.v3i1.79273
Schillings, P., André, M., Matoul., A., & Dupont, V. (2023a). PIRLS 2021: Note de synthèse. Service général du Pilotage du Système éducatif. https://www.pirls-fwb.uliege.be/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-05/note_de_synthese.pdf
Schillings, P., Géron, S., & Dupont, V. (2017). Étude comparative des pratiques d’enseignement de la lecture en 4e primaire : Des questions de didactique pointées par l’étude internationale PIRLS 2011. Forumlecture suisse, 3, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.58098/lffl/2017/3/613
Schmidt, W. H., & Maier, A. (2009). Opportunity to learn. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D.N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of Education Policy Research, (pp. 541-559). New York: Routledge.
Schmidt, W. H., & McKnight, C. C. (1995). Surveying educational opportunity in mathematics and science: An International Perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737017003337
Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide (NCEE 2010-4038). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/readingcomp_pg_092810.pdf
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
Stevens, F. I., Wiltz, L., & Bailey, M. (1998). Teachers’ evaluations of the sustainability of opportunity to learn (OTL) assessment strategies. A national survey of classroom teachers in large urban school districts. Temple University, Laboratory for Student Success/Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A meta- analytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K–12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420–456.
UNESCO-UIS, (2018). Handbook on measuring equity in education. UNESCO Institute for Statistics Publishing.
Van Damme, J., & Bellens, K. (2017). Countries strive towards more quality and equity in education: Do they show success or failure? Evidence from TIMSS 2003 and 2011, for Grade 4. In Rosén, M., Hansen, Y.K., Wolff, U. (Eds.) Cognitive Abilities and Educational Outcomes. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43473-5_7
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
von Davier, M., Mullis, I. V. S., Fishbein, B., & Foy, P. (Eds.). (2023). Methods and procedures: PIRLS 2021 Technical Report. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://pirls2021.org/methods
Ziegler, J., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2023). Apprendre à lire : du décodage à la compréhension écrite. A.N.A.E., 182, 45-54.