Truths and Lies Regarding Nietzsche's Philosophical Stance
Abstract
Friedrich Nietzsche remains one of the most misunderstood figures of the 19th century, having been characterized both negatively and positively by various political and ideological factions. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the reality of these accusations and their logical consistency within his work. Using the methodology of historian Quentin Skinner, the study examines Nietzsche's relationship with several key areas: (a) ideas of social emancipation, (b) anarchism, individualism, and nihilism, and (c) fascism, racialism, and antisemitism. The author argues that while Nietzsche was not a "democrat" in the modern sense and favored a hierarchical society, he also cannot be simply categorized as a precursor to fascism or a reactionary. The analysis seeks to move beyond postwar "humanistic" interpretations to provide an objective, scientific look at what Nietzsche actually wrote.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Dritsas, G. (2022). Truths and Lies Regarding Nietzsche’s Philosophical Stance. Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (15), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.30733
- Issue
- No. 15 (2022)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).