Teachers' perspectives on the adoption of a Chatbot in the teaching and learning process
Resumen
Chatbots are programs that, with respect to the principles of Artificial Intelligence, have the ability to engage in a conversation either through the use of text messages or through oral speech and offer services such as assisting program users, guiding web visitors, customer service, product advertising, or even answering questions about a specific subject matter. Considering the usefulness and proven benefits of Chatbots in numerous areas of daily life, a careful study, regarding the utilization / adoption of Chatbots in the teaching/learning process, is necessary. The introduction of Chatbots in the field of education, attributing to them the role of a teacher assistant who, on the one hand, will be available 24/7 to the students, supporting the learning process and answering their questions and, on the other hand, improving the working conditions of teachers, offering them more free time and the opportunity to add more quality features to their teaching work, constitutes a great challenge. In that context, the results of a relative research are presented, where teachers in secondary education after having tested Chatbots at a pilot stage, express their opinions.
Article Details
- Cómo citar
-
Dimitriadis, G., & Koskinas, K. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on the adoption of a Chatbot in the teaching and learning process. Homo Virtualis, 6(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.35965
- Sección
- Articles
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Abbasi, S., & Kazi, H. (2014). Measuring effectiveness of learning chatbot systems on Student's learning outcome and memory retention. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 3(7), 57-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.15590/ajase/2014/v3i7/53576
Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R. A., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012). Student's Participation in Classroom:What Motivates them to Speak up? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 516-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.199
Amin, J. (2016). Redefining the Role of Teachers in the Digital Era. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.25215/0303.101
Ayas, A. (2009). The Importance of Teaching Profession and Current Problems in Teacher Training. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(3), 1-12. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/inuefd/issue/8704/108679
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954
Benotti, L., Martínez, M. C., & Schapachnik, F. (2014). Engaging high school students using chatbots. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education, Uppsala, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591728
Bhat, J. (2017, August 14). Attention Spans in the Age of Technology | NAMI: National Alliance on Mental Illness. Retrieved March 08, 2022, from National Alliance on Mental Illness. https://www.nami.org/Blogs/NAMI-Blog/August-2017/Attention-Spans-in-the-Age-ofTechnology
Brailas, A., Avani, S., Gkini, C., Deilogkou, M., Koskinas, K., & Alexias, G. (2017). Experiential Learning in Action: A Collaborative Inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 22(1), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2551
Brailas, A. (2019). Psychotherapy in the era of artificial intelligence: Therapist Panoptes. Homo Virtualis, 2(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.20197
Brailas, A. (2020). Rhizomatic Learning in Action: A Virtual Exposition for Demonstrating Learning Rhizomes. Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436565
Brailas, A. (2023). Rhizomes, nomads, and complexity. A new relational pedagogy for the era of networks, social media and artificial intelligence. In M. S. Khine, New Directions in Rhizomatic Learning (1st ed., pp. 98–116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376378-9
Casas, D. L., & Sierra, J. P. (2022). Technological Singularity and Ethical Issues of AI. In A. Landeta Echeberria (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence for Business: Innovation, Tools and Practices, 159-185, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88241-9_7
Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Teachable Agents and the Protégé Effect: Increasing the Effort Towards Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 334-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9180-4
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Clarizia, F., Colace, F., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., & Santaniello, D. (2018). Chatbot: An Education Support System for Student. In A. Castiglione, F. Pop, M. Ficco, F. Palmieri (Eds.), Cyberspace Safety and Security, 291-302. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01689-0_23
Commeyras, M. (1995). What can we learn from students’ questions? Theory Into Practice, 34(2), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543666
Cross, K. P. (1998). Why Learning Communities? Why Now? About Campus, 3(3), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/108648229800300303
Cunningham-Nelson, S., Boles, W., Trouton, L., & Margerison, E. (2019). A review of chatbots in education: Practical steps forward. In 30th Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2019): Educators Becoming Agents of Change: Innovate, Integrate, Motivate. Engineers Australia, Australia, 299-306.
Di Blas, N., Lodi, L., Paolini, P., Pernici, B., Raspa, N., Rooein, D., & Renzi, F. (2019). Sustainable Chatbots supporting Learning. Paper presented at the EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2019, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/210148
Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies, Learning to Teach in the Primary School, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. 71-89. https://ro.uow.edu.au/asdpapers/403/
Eristi, S. D. B., Kurt, A. A., & Dindar, M. (2012). Teachers' Views about Effective Use of Technology in Classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3(2), 30-41.
Francisco J. García-Peñalvo. (2023). The perception of Artificial Intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or Panic? Education in the Knowledge Society, 24, Article e31279. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279
Garcia Brustenga, G., Fuertes-Alpiste, M., & Molas-Castells, N. (2018). Briefing paper: chatbots in education. Barcelona: eLearn Center. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. https://doi.org/10.7238/elc.chatbots.2018
Garzón-Artacho, E., Sola-Martínez, T., Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., & Gómez-García, G. (2021). Teachers' perceptions of digital competence at the lifelong learning stage. Heliyon, 7(7), e07513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07513
Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and Learning with ICT Tools: Issues and Challenges from Teachers' Perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 38-57.
Griol, D., López, J. M. M., & Sanchis, A. (2014). The Geranium System: Multimodal Conversational Agents for E-learning. In: Omatu S., Bersini H., Corchado J., Rodríguez S., Pawlewski P., Bucciarelli E. (eds). Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 11th International Conference. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 290, 219-226, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07593-8_26
Guri-Rosenblit, S., & Gros, B. (2011). E-Learning: Confusing Terminology, Research Gaps and Inherent Challenges. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 25(1). https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/729
Han, D.-E. (2020). The Effects of Voice-based AI Chatbots on Korean EFL Middle School Students’ Speaking Competence and Affective Domains. Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange, 6, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.47116/apjcri.2020.07.07
Hien, H. T., Cuong, P.-N., Nam, L. N. H., Nhung, H. L. T. K., & Thang, L. D. (2018). Intelligent Assistants in Higher-Education Environments: The FIT-EBot, a Chatbot for Administrative and Learning Support. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287921.3287937
Ho, C. C., Lee, H. L., Lo, W. K., & Lui, K. F. A. (2018, 31 July-2 Aug. 2018). Developing a Chatbot for College Student Programme Advisement. Paper presented at the 2018 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2018.00021
Hone, K., & El Said, G. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
Kehrer, P., Kelly, K., & Heffernan, N. (2013). Does immediate feedback while doing homework improve learning? FLAIRS 2013 - Proceedings of the 26th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, 542-545.
Kerly, A., Hall, P., & Bull, S. (2007). Bringing chatbots into education: Towards natural language negotiation of open learner models. Knowledge-Based Systems, 20(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2006.11.014
Kim, K.-N. (2019). Teachers’ administrative workload crowding out instructional activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1572592
Kim, T. W., & Mejia, S. (2019). From Artificial Intelligence to Artificial Wisdom: What Socrates Teaches Us. Computer (IEEE Computer Society), 52(10), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2019.2929723
Kiptonui, B. (2013). Chatbot technology: A possible means of unlocking student potential to learn how to learn. Educational Research, 4(2), 218-221.
Knill, O., Carlsson, J., Chi, A., & Lezama, M. (2004). An artificial intelligence experiment in college math education. Preprint available at https://people.math.harvard.edu/~knill/preprints/sofia.pdf
Koskinas, K. (2018). Editorial: Homo Virtualis Inaugural Issue. Homo Virtualis, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.18621
Kreuzfeld, S., Felsing, C., & Seibt, R. (2022). Teachers’ working time as a risk factor for their mental health - findings from a cross-sectional study at German upper-level secondary schools. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12680-5
Le, N.-T., & Huse, N. (2016). Evaluation of the Formal Models for the Socratic Method. In: Micarelli A., Stamper J., Panourgia K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9684, 69-78. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_7
Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., & Bhogal, R. S. (1997). The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258797
López, J., Pozo, S., Morales, M., & López, E. (2019b). Digital competence of future teachers to carry out a process of teaching and learning through virtual reality. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 67, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.67.1327
Nalyvaiko, O., & Maliutina, A. (2021). Use of chat boots in the educational process of a higher education institution. Scientific notes of the pedagogical department, 48, 117-122. https://doi.org/10.26565/2074-8167-2021-48-14
Ndukwe, I. G., Daniel, B. K., & Amadi, C. E. (2019). A Machine Learning Grading System Using Chatbots. In: Isotani S., Millán E., Ogan A., Hastings P., McLaren B., Luckin R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11626, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_67
Nika, S., & Brailas, A. (2022). Interaction in the Mathematics Class: The Shaping Process of Inquiry-based Learning. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.3.249
Nykvist, S., & Mukherjee, M. (2016). Who am I? Developing Pre-service Teacher Identity in a Digital World. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 851-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.012
Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033
Ondáš, S., Pleva, M., & Hládek, D. (2019). How chatbots can be involved in the education process. 17th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), 575-580. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA48886.2019.9040095
Pérez-Marín, D. (2021). A Review of the Practical Applications of Pedagogic Conversational Agents to Be Used in School and University Classrooms. Digital, 1(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital1010002
Pérez, J. Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J. M. M. (2020). Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1549-1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22326
Reid, P. (2020, August 31). Identifying, Evaluating, and Adopting New Teaching and Learning Technologies. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/8/identifying-evaluating-and-adopting-new-teaching-and-learning-technologies
Reinsfield, E., & Williams, P. J. (2018). New Zealand secondary technology teachers’ perceptions: “technological” or “technical” thinking? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 739-751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9418-z
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
Sandu, N., & Gide, E. (2019). Adoption of AI-Chatbots to Enhance Student Learning Experience in Higher Education in India. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET46829.2019.8937382
Shawar, B. A., & Atwell, E. (2007). Chatbots: Are they Really Useful? LDV Forum, 22(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.22.2007.88
Studente, S., & Ellis, S. (2020). Enhancing the Online Student Experience Through Creating Learning Communities—The Benefits of Chatbots in Higher Education. In S. McKenzie, F. Garivaldis & K. R. Dyer (Eds.), Tertiary Online Teaching and Learning, 25-33, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8928-7_3
Vakali, E., & Brailas, A. (2018). “Me and my students’ smartphones in the classroom”: A case study using arts-based methods. Homo Virtualis, 1(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.19070
Waal, P., & Galliani, L. (2009). Handling the Effects of Digital Abundance: How to Train Teachers for the Future? 7th International Conference on Education and Information Systems, Technologies and Applications: EISTA. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4632.5205
Wikispaces. (2022). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikispaces
Yayuk Hayulina, M., & Fatimah Sari, S. (2018, 2018/12). Developing Students Critical Thinking on Speaking Through Socratic Questioning Method. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/iclle-18.2018.35
Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
