Σχέση της κινητικής ευχέρειας και της κινητικής ευελιξίας κατά την εκτέλεση δημιουργικής κίνησης

PDF (ελληνικά)
Published: Jul 1, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/icw.18125
Αγγελική Τσαπακίδου (Aggeliki Tsapakidou)
Παιδαγωγικό Τμήμα Νηπιαγωγών, Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης
Ε. Ζαχοπούλου (E. Zachopoulou)
Τμήμα Επιστήμης Φυσικής Αγωγής & Αθλητισμού, Δημοκρίτειο Παν/μιο Θράκης
Β. Αλεξίου (B. Alexiou)
Παιδαγωγικό Τμήμα Νηπιαγωγών Φλώρινας, Α.Π.Θ.
Θ. Τσομπανάκη (Th. Tsompanaki)
Abstract

The criterion measures of motor creativity are motor fluency and motor flexibility. The aim of this study was to examine the relation between these two criterion measures. 84 preschool children participated in the experimental procedure. The two parameters of motor creativity, during the execution of locomotor skills and manipulative skills, were assessed using the Divergent movement ability test and the data were correlated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The results revealed statistically significant correlation between motor fluency and flexibility in each movement task of the test, and for motor fluency between the two movement tasks. Children, who executed many different motor responses, had also the ability to produce motor solutions with different quality due to the activation of divergent and creative thinking. Physical education lesson can be a unique implement for development of creativity, through the application of an appropriate teaching procedure, with basic goal the learning activation of the children.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Scientific articles & educational projects
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Barron, F. & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.
Benack, S., Basseches, M. & Swan, T. (1989). Dialectical thinking and adult creaitivity. In Grover, J., Ronning, R. & Reynolds, C. (Eds) Handbook of creativity. New York : Plenum.
Berretta, S. & Privette, G. (1990). Influence of play on creative thinking. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 659-666.
Brown, R. (1989). Creativity: What are we measure?. In Grover, J., Ronning, R. & Reynolds, C. (Eds) Handbook of creativity. New York : Plenum.
Busse, T. & Mansfield, R. (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of creative behavior, 14(2), 91-132.
Cleland, F. & Gallahue, D. (1993). Young children's divergent movement ability. Perceptual and motor skills, 77, 535-544.
Cleland, F. (1994). Young children's divergent movement ability: Study II. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 228-241.
Δερβίσης, Σ. (1998). H ômiiovpyiKif σκέψη, και η δημιουργική διδακτική, διαδικασία. Θεσ/νίκη: Μαίανδρος.
Dodd, Η. & White, Μ. (1980). Cognition: Mental structures and processes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Ennis, P. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 410.
Fisher, R. (1990). Teaching children to think. Ed. R. Fisher, London.
Guilford, J. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
Katiyaa, C. & Jarial, S. (1985). Training programs for developing creativity in school children. Journal of creative behavior, 19(3), 219-220.
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and Innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629.
McBride, R. (1992). Critical thinking - An overview with implications for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 112-125.
Runco, M. & Okuda, S. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 211-220.
Runco, M. (1992). The evaluative, valuative and divergent thinking of children. Journal of creative behavior, 25, 311-319.
Schack, G. (1993). Effects of a creative problem-solving curriculum on students of varying ability levels. Gifted child quarterly, 37(1), 37-40.
Schank, R. (1988). Creativity as a mechanical process. In R. Sternberg (Eds) The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slabbert, J. (1994). Creativity in education revisited: reflection in aid of progression. The Journal of creative behavior, 28 (1), 6068.
Sternberg, R. (1988). The nature of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
Swartz, R. (1987). Teaching for thinking: A developmental model for the infusion of thinking skills into mainstream instruction. In J. Baron & R. Sternberg (Eds), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp, 106-126). New York: Freeman.
Ward, W. (1974). Creativity in young children. Journal of creative behavior, 8, 101-106.
Wyrick, W. (1968). The development of a test of motor creativity. Research Quarterly, 39(3), 756-765.
Most read articles by the same author(s)