Social values, environmental attitudes and environmental behavior among students in Greece, Cyprus and Switzerland
Published:
Oct 15, 2020
Keywords:
Social values Individualism – collectivism environmental values New ecological paradigm
Abstract
environmental behavior and the various parameters that determine it constitute a broad area in which research has penetrated in recent years utilizing a host of research approaches and theories from the field, mainly social, and environmental psychology and sociology. The present study focuses on the above subject area, positing individual and
comparative questions and monitoring the way in which specific research models stand up to samples from different cultural environments. Findings from an empirical – comparative study conducted by the authors in university departments from three countries are presented; Greece, Cyprus and Switzerland (N = 669), in which the role that social values and environmental attitudes play in shaping environmental behavior were studied in particular. The research highlighted the decisive influence of specific social values and particularly ‘environmental values’ and those of Individualism and Collectivism. Significant individual differences were revealed between participants from the three countries not only in terms of their environmental behavior but also regarding the weight of each factor that affects this, as well as their environmental attitudes and the mediating role they play between values and behavior.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Παπαστυλιανού Α., & Παπαδημητρίου Ε. (2020). Social values, environmental attitudes and environmental behavior among students in Greece, Cyprus and Switzerland. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 21(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.23279
- Issue
- Vol. 21 No. 3 (2014)
- Section
- SPECIAL SECTION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Amburgey, J.W. & Thoman, D.B. (2012). Dimensionality
of the New ecological Paradigm: Issues of
factor structure and measurement. Environment
and Behavior, 44, 235-256.
Axelrod, L.J. (1994). Balancing personal needs with
environmental preservation: identifying the values
that guide decisions in ecological dilemmas. Journal
of Social Issues, 50, 85-104.
Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). The effect
of Flemish eco-schools on student environmental
knowledge, attitudes and affect. International
Journal of Science Education, 33, 1513-1538.
Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). A
Cross-Cultural Study of environmental Values and
their effect on the environmental Behavior of Children.
Environment and Behavior, 33, 551-583.
Βond, M. H., Leung, K., & Schwartz, S.H. (1992). explaining
choises in procedural and distributive justice
across cultures. International Journal of Psychology.
, 211-2225.
Bookchin, M. (1992). Τι είναι Κοινωνική Οικολογία;.
Αθήνα: Βιβλιόπολις.
Bourdieu, P. (1972). Outline of a theory of practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cini, F., Leone, L. & Passafaro, P. (2012). Promoting
ecotourism among young people. A segmentation
strategy. Environment and Behavior, 44, 87-106.
Cordano, M., Welcomer, S., Scherer, F.R., Pradenas,
L. & Parada, V. (2011). A cross-Cultural assessment
of Three Theories of Pro-environmental Behavior:
A comparison between Business students
of Chile and the United States. Environment and
Behavior, 43, 634-657.
Corral-Vertugo, V. & Armendariz, L.I. (2000). The “New
environmental Paradigm” in a Mexican Community.
The Journal of Environmental Education, 31,
-31.
Corral-Vertugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M, Moser, G.
& Sinha, J.B.P. (2008). environmental Beliefs and
endorsement of sustainable development principles
in water conservation. Toward an New Human
Interdependence Paradigm Scale. Environment
and Behavior, 40, 703-725.
Dunlap, R. e. (2008). The New environmental
Paradigm Scale: From marginality to worldwide
use. Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 3-18.
Dunlap, R.e., & Van Liere, K.D. (1978). The “New environmental
Paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument
and preliminary results. The Journal of
Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
Dunlap, R.e., Grieneeks, J.K. & Rokeach, M. (1983),
“Human values and pro-environmental behavior”
in Conn, W.D. (ed.), energy and material resources:
Attitudes, values and public policy (pp.
-168). Bouldier, CO: Westview.
Dunlap, R.e., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G. & Jones,
R.e. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New
ecological Paradigm: A revised NeP scale. Journal
of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political
theory: towards an ecocentric approach. New
York: State University of New York Press.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention,
and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A. & Jakobsson, C.
(2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation
on determinants of proenvironmental behavior
intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
, 1-9.
Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D. & Smith, T. (2011).
The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs
and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy
Policy, 39, 7684-7694.
Garc
Volunteering, pro-environmental attitudes and
norms. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 455-
doi:10.1016/j.socec.2011.07.001
Georgas, J. (1989). Changing family values in Greece:
from collectivist to individualist. Journal of Cross
Cultural Psychology, 20, 80-91.
Gillham, P.F. (2008). Participation in the environmental
Movement: Analysis of the european Union. International
Sociology, 23, 67-93.
Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations:
Gender differences and similarities. Merril-
Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223-237.
Györkös, Ch., Becker, J., Massoudi, K., Antonietti, JP.,
Pocnet, C., De Bruin, G.P. & Rossier, J-P.
(2013). Comparing the Horizontal and the Vertical
Individualism an Collectivism Scale in Two Cultures:
Switzerland and South Africa. Cross-Cultural
Research, 47, 310-331.
Hawcroft, L. J., & Milfont, T. L. (2010). The use (and
Κοινωνικές αξίες, περιβαλλοντικές στάσεις και περιβαλλοντική συμπεριφορά φοιτητών u 257
abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale
over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of
Environmental
Psychology, 30, 143-158.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international
differences in work-related values. Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (2001 2nd edition). Culture’s consequences.
Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi:
Sage Publications.
Holt, D.B. (2012). Constructing Sustainable Consumption:
From ethical values to the cultural
transformation of unsustainable markets. The Annals
of the American Academy of Political and Social
Science. 644, 236-255
Hui, C. H. & Triandis, H. C. (1984). What does individualism-
collectivism mean : A study of social scientists.
Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois
Department of Psychology, Urbana.
Hui, C. H. & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in
cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison
of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
, 131-152.
Hurst, M., Dittmar, H., Bond, R. & Kasser, T. (2013).
The relationship between materialistic values and
environmental attitudes and behaviors: A metaanalysis.
Journal of environmental Psychology, 36,
-269.
Johnson C.Y., Bowker, J. M. & Cordell, H. K. (2004).
ethnic variation in environmental Belief and behavior:
An examination of the New ecological
Paradigm in a social psychological context. Environment
and Behavior, 36, 157-186.
Kaiser, F. G., & Byrka, K. (2011). environmentalism as
a trait: Gauging people’s prosocial personality in
terms of environmental engagement. International
Journal of Psychology, 46, 71-79.
Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental
behavior. Environment and Behavior,
, 111-133.
Kim, S., Jeong, S-H. & Hwang, Y. (2012). Predictors
for pro-environmental behaviors for American and
Korean Students: The application of the theory of
Reasoned Action and Protection Motivation Theory.
Science Communication, 35, 168-188.
Laidley, T.M. (2013). The influence of social class and
cultural variables on environmental behaviors:
Municipal-Level evidence from Massachusetts.
Environment and Behavior, 45, 170-197.
Lampridis, e. & Papastylianou, A. (2014). Prosocial
behavioural tendencies and orientation towards
individualism-collectivism of Greek young adults.
International Journal of Adolescence and Youth,
Lee, J.A., Soutar, G.N., Daly, T.M. & Louviere, J.J.
(2011). Schwartz Values Clusters in the United
States and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
, 234-252.
Leung, C. & Rice, J. (2002). Comparison of Chinese-
Australian and Anglo-Australian environmental attitudes
and behaviour. Social Behavior and Personality,
, 251-262.
Leung, K., Βond, M. H. & Schwartz, S.H., (1995). How
to explain cross-cultural differences: Values, valences
and expectancies? Asian Journal of Psychology,
, 70-75.
Maloney M.P. & Ward M. (1973). “ecology: Let’s hear
from the people”. American Psychologist, 28, 583-
Maréchal, K. (2009). An evolutionary perspective on
the economics of energy consumption: The crucial
role of habits. Journal of Economic Issues, 43,
-79.
Markus, H.R. & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear
of the collective: Implications for selves and theories
of selves. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 20, 568-579.
Mirosa, M., Lawson, L. & Gnoth, D. (2011). Linking
Personal Values to energy-efficient Behaviors in
the home. Environment and Behavior, 45, 455-475.
Mylonas, K., Gari, Ai., Giotsa, A., Pavlopoulos, V., &
Panayiotopoulou, P. (2006). Greece. Στο:, J.
Georgas, J. W. Berry, F. J. Van de Vijver, C. Kagitcibasi,
& Y. H. Poortinga (επιμ.), Families Across
Cultures. A 30-National Psychological Study. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Nilsson, A.,Von Borgstede, C. & Biel, A. (2004). Willingness
to accept climate change strategies: The
effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 24, 267-277.
Nooney, J.G., Woodrum, e.,Hoban, T.J. & Clifford,
W.B. (2003). environmental worldview and behavior:
Consequences of dimensionality in a survey
of North Carolinians. Environment and Behavior,
, 763-783.
Nordlund, A.M. & Garvil, J. (2002). Value structures
behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment
and Behavior, 34, 740-756.
Oreg, S. & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental
behavior cross-nationaly: Values and
u Αντωνία Παπαστυλιανού και Ευριπίδης Παπαδημητρίου
theory of Planned Behavior and Value-Belief-
Norm Theory. Environment and Behavior, 38, 462-
Παπαστυλιανού, Α. & Παπαδημητρίου, Ε. (2009). Κοι-
νωνικές αξίες, περιβαλλοντική ευαισθητοποίηση
και συμπεριφορά. Στο μ. Καϊλα & Ε. Θεοδωρο-
πούλου (Επιμ.) Περιβαλλοντική Ηθική. Αθήνα:
Ατραπός.
Παπαστυλιανού, Α. & τσαϊρίδης, Χ. (υπό προετοιμα-
σία. ΄Ελεγχος και στάθμιση της Κλίμακας
Κοινωνικών Αξιών «Εστία».
Pienaar, e.F., Lew, D.K. & Wallmo, K. (2013). Are environmental
attitudes influenced by survey context?
An investigation of the context dependency
of the New ecological Paradigm (NeP) Scale. Social
Science Research, 42, 1542-1554 http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.001
Poortinga, W., Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental
concern and environmental behavior:
A study into household energy use. Environment
and Behavior, 36, 70-93.
Price,S. & Pitt, M. (2012). The influence of facilities and
environmental values on recycling in an office environment.
Indoor and Built Environment, 21, 622-632.
Rauwald, K.S. & Moore, C.F. (2002). environmental attitudes
as predictors of policy support across
three countries. Environment and Behavior, 34,
-739.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values.
New York: Free Press.
Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal
versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological
Monographs, 80, (Whole No 609).
Sapci, O. & Considine, T. (2013). The link between environmental
attitudes and energu consumption
behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental
Economics, 52, 29-34.
Schwartz, S. H. (1968). Words, deeds, and the perception
of consequences and responsibility in action
situations. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 10, 232-242.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and
structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in
countries. In M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental
social psychology (Vol. 25) (pp. 1-65).
New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S.H. (1994α). Beyond individualism/collectivism:
new dimensions of values. Στο: U. Kim,
H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi, S.C. Choi & G. Yoon
(επιμ.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory application
and methods. Newbury Park, CA:
Schwartz, S.H. (1994β). Are there universal aspects in
the structure and content of human values? Journal
of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286-302.
Schwartz, S.H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and
some implications for work. Applied Psychology:
An international review, 48 (1), 23-47.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies
across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.
Schultz, P. W. (2001). «The structure of environmental
concern: Concern for self, other people, and the
biosphere», Journal of Environmental Psychology,
, 1-13.
Schultz, P.W. & Zelezny, L.C. (1998) Values and
proenvironmental behaviour: A five-country survey.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29,
-558.
Schulz, P.W. & Zelezny, L.C. (1999). Values as predictors
of environmental attitudes: evidence for
consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 19, 255-265.
Schulz, P.W., Ζelezny, L. & Dalrymple, N.J. (2000). A
multinational perspective on the relation between
Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of
environmental concern. Environment and Behavior,
, 576-591.
Schultz, P.W., Gouveia, V.V., Cameron, L.D., Tankha,
G., Schmuck, P. & Franek, M. (2005). Values and
their relationship to environmental concern and
conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural
Psychology, 36, 457-475.
Simmons, D. D., Binney, S. e., & Dodd, B. (1992).
Valuing “a clean environment.” Journal of Social
Behavior and Personality, 7, 649-658.
Smith, P.B. & Bond, M.H. (2012). Διαπολιτισμική Κοι-
νωνική Ψυχολογία (Επιστημ.επιμ. Α. Παπαστυλια-
νού). Αθήνα: eκδόσεις Gutenberg.
Smith, P.B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National
culture and managerial values: A dimensional
analysis across 43 nations. Journal of
Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231-264.
Smith, P.B. & Schwartz, S.H. (1997). Values. In, J.W.
Berry, M.H. Segall & C. Kagitçibasi (eds.), Handbook
of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2nd edition,
Volume 3. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Spini, D. (2003). Measurement equivalence of 10 value
types from the Schwartz Value Survey across
countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
, 3-23.
Steg, L., Drijerink, L. & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors
influencing the acceptability of energy policies:
Testing VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
, 415-425.
Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., van der Werff, e. & Lurvink,
J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for
environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences
and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46, 163-
Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change:
The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally
significant behavior. Journal of Social
Issues, 56 (3), 407-424.
Stern, P.C./Dietz, T. (1994). «The value basis of the environmental
concern». Journal of Social Issues,
, 65-84.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. &
Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support
for social movements: The case of environmentalism.
Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T. & Black. J.S. (1985). «Support for
environmental protection: The role of moral
norms». Population & Environment, 8, 204-222
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The
new ecological paradigm in social-psychological
context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T. & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations,
gender, and environmental concern. Environment
and Behavior, 25, 322-348
Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Snelgar, R., &
Furnham, A. (2010). egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric
environmental concerns: A path analytic
investigation of their determinants. Scandinavian
Journal of Psychology, 51, 139-145.
Tamayo, A., & Schwartz, S. (1993). Motivational structure
of human values. Psicologie: Teoria e
Pesquisa, 9, 329-348.
Toner-Raimi, K. & Leary, M.R. (2014). Belief superiority
in the environmental domain:
Attitude extremity and reactions to fracking. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 40, 76-85.
Triandis, H.C., Leung, K., Vallareal, M.J. & Clack, F.L.
(1985). Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies.
Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of
Research in Personality, 19, 395-415.
Vikan, A., Camino, C., Biaggio, A., & Nordvik, H.
(2007). endorsement of the New ecological
Paradigm: A Comparison of two Brazilian Samples
and One Norwegian Sample. Environment
and Behavior, 39, 217-228.
Vringer, K., Aalbers, T., & Blok, K. (2007). Household
energy requirement and value patterns. Energy
Policy, 35, 553-566.
Widegren, Ö. (1998). The New environmental
Paradigm and personal norms. Environment and
Behavior, 30, 75-100.
