Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) in the Greek Population
Published:
Oct 15, 2020
Keywords:
Cross-cultural adaptation PSWQ Factor structure Worry Confirmatory factor analysis
Abstract
The aim of this study was the adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) in the Greek language. Particularly, we were interested in investigating the factor structure of the scale, using a non-clinical sample (N = 184), aged 16-80 years old. In order to investigate the factorial structure of the measure we used confirmatory factor analysis. We tested three different models: the one-factor model (all items loading on one general worry factor), the two-factor model (two independent factors: Worry Engagement and Absence of Worry), and the three-factor model. The results showed that the three-factor model fitted the Greek data better, confirming the results from previous studies which suggested that PSWQ is a uni-dimensional worry instrument, in spite the fact that method effects appear to be associated with positively and negatively keyed items. Finally, the instrument demonstrated excellent internal consistency and mean inter-item correlations, which provide sound evidence regarding the consistency and homogeneity of the items in measuring the construct of worry.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Λιάλιου Δ., Μεσίρης Γ., Ραμαντάνη Α. .-. Α., & Τσαούσης Ι. (2020). Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) in the Greek Population. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 18(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.23721
- Issue
- Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011)
- Section
- RESEARCH PAPERS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.
Downloads
References
Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos 18 User’s Guide. Chica -
go, IL.: SPSS Inc.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th
ed.). American Psychiatric Association: Wash -
ington, DC.
Δ. Λιάλιου, Γ. Μεσίρης, Α.-Α. Ραμαντάνη και Ι. Τσαούσης
Bagozzi, R. P. (1993). An examination of the psy -
chometric properties of measures of negative af -
fect in the PANASX scales. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 65, 836-851.
Baumgartner, H. & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2001).
Response styles in marketing research: A crossnational
investigation. Journal of Marketing Re -
search, 38, 143-156.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A.
(1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxi -
ety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consult -
ing and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.
Beck, J. G., Stanley, M. A., & Zebb, B. J. (1995). Psy -
chometric properties of the Penn State Worry
Questionnaire in older adults. Journal of Clinical
Gerontology, 1, 33-42.
Borkovec, T. D., Ray,W. J., & Stöber, J. (1998). Wor -
ry: A cognitive phenomenon intimately linked to
affective, physiological, and interpersonal be -
havior processes. Cognitive Therapy and Re -
search, 22, 561-576.
Briggs, S. R. & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor
analysis in the development and evaluation of
personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54,
-148.
Brown T. A. (2003) Confirmatory factor analysis of the
Penn State Worry Questionnaire: multiple factors
or method effects? Behaviour Research and
Therapy. 41, 1411–1426.
Brown, T. A., Antony, M. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1992).
Psy chometric properties of the Penn State Wor ry
Questionnaire in a clinical anxiety disorders sam -
ple. Behavior Research and Therapy, 30, 33-37.
Carter, Μ. Μ., Sbrocco, Τ., Miller, Jr., Ο., Suchday,
S., Lewis, E. L., & Freedman, R. E. K. (2005).
Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the
Penn State Worry Questionnaire: differences be -
tween African-American and White-American col -
lege students. Anxiety Disorders, 19, 827-843.
Castillo, C., Macrini, L., Cheniaux. E., & Landeira-Fer -
nandez, J. (2010). Psychometric Properties and
Latent Structure of the Portuguese Version of the
Penn State Worry Questionnaire. The Spanish
Journal of Psychology , 13, 431-443.
Chelminski, I. & Zimmerman, M. (2003). Pathological
worry in depressed and anxious patients. Journal
of Anxiety Disorders. 17, 533-546.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the in -
ternal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 296-
Davey, G. C. L. (1993). A comparison of three worry
questionnaires. Behavior Research and Therapy,
, 51-56.
Davey, G. C., Hampton, J., Farrell, J., & Davidson, S.
(1992). Some characteristics of worrying: evi -
dence for worrying and anxiety as separate con -
structs. Personality and Individual Differences,
, 133-147.
DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of
kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307.
Fortune, D., Richards, H., Griffiths, C., & Main, C.
(2005).Worry and pathological worry in patients
with psoriasis: cross sectional and longitudinal
analyses of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
(PSWQ) in four samples of patients. Journal of
Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 12, 143-
Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Mennin, D. S., &
Turk, C. L. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of
the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour
Research and Therapy, 40, 313-323.
Gana, K., Martin, B., Canouet, M.D., Trouillet, R., Mel -
oni, F. (2002). Factorial Structure of a French
Version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
, 158-164.
Gelder, G. G., L pez- Ibor, J. J., & Andreasen N.
(2008). Σύγχρονη Ψυχιατρική (Τόμος 2). Αθήνα:
Ιατρικές Εκδόσεις Πασχαλίδης.
Griffin, P. (2005). Developing a measure of wealth for
primary student families in a developing country:
Comparison of two methods of psychometric cal -
ibration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31,
-206.
Hu, L. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit in -
dexes in covariance structure analysis: Conven -
tional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural
Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Hunt, S., Wisocki, P., & Yanko, J. (2003). Worry and
use of coping strategies among older and
younger adults. Anxiety Disorders, 17, 547-560.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. G. (1993). Lisrel 8:
Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS
command language. Chicago: Scientific Software
International.
Lim, Y. J, Kim, Y. H, Lee, E. H., & Kwon, S. M. (2008).
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire Psychome -
tric Properties of the Korean Version. Depression
and Anxiety. 25: E97-E103.
Long, J. S. (1983). Covariance structure models: An
Προσαρμογή του PSWQ στην Ελλάδα 251
introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
MacCallum, R. C., Roznoswi, M., & Necowitz, L. B.
(1992). Model modifications in covariance struc -
ture analysis: The problem of capitalization on
chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504.
Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global
self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinc -
tion or artifactors? Journal of Personality and So -
cial Psychology, 70, 810–819.
Meloni, F, & Gana, K. (2001). Wording effects in the
Italian version of the Penn State Worry Ques -
tionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psycho the -
rapy, 8, 282-287.
Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec,
T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the
Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behavior Re -
search and Therapy, 28, 487–495.
Molina, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The Penn State
Worry Questionnaire: Psychometric properties
and associated characteristics. In G. Davey & F.
Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory,
assessment, and treatment (pp. 265-283). New
York: Wiley.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychomet -
ric Theory, (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Olatunji, B., O., Schottenbauer, M., A., Rodriguez, B.,
F., Glass, C., R., Arnkoff, D., B. (2007). The struc -
ture of worry: Relations between positive/nega -
tive personality characteristics and the Penn
State Worry Questionnaire. Journal of Anxiety
Disorders, 21, 540-553.
Pallesen, S, Nordhus, I. H., Carlstedt, B., Thayer, J. F.,
& Johnsen, T. B. (2006). A Norwegian adap tation
of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: factor
structure, reliability, validity and norms. Scandi -
navian Journal of Psychology, 47, 281-291.
Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally,
R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequen -
cy, and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour
Research and Therapy 24, pp. 1-8.
Roemer, L., Borkovec, M., Posa, S., & Borkovec, T.
D. (1995). A self-report diagnostic measure of
generalized anxiety disorders. Journal of Behav -
ior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 345-
Russell, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying di -
mensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis
in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28,
-1646.
Sand n, B., Chorot, P., Santed, M. A., Jiménez, P., &
Romero, M. (1994). Ansiedad cognitiva y som ti -
ca: relaci n con otras variables de ansiedad y
psicosom ticas. Revista de Psicolog a General y
Aplicada, 47, 313-320.
Spielberger C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. D.
(1970). STAI: manual for the State – Trait Anxiety
Invetory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists
Press.
Stöber, J. (1998). Reliability and validity of two wide -
ly-used worry questionnaires: Self-report and
self-peer convergence. Personality and Individual
Differences, 24, 887-890.
Stöber, J. (1995). Besorgnis: Ein Vergleich dreier In -
ventare zur Erfassung allgemeiner Sorgen.
Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische
Psychologie, 16, 50-63.
Tallis, F., Eysenck, M. W. & Mathews, A. (1992). A
questionnaire for the measurement of nonpatho -
logical worry . Personality for Individual Differ -
ences, 13, 161-168
van Rijsoort, S., Emmelkamp, P., & Vervaeke, G.
(1999). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire and
the Worry Domains Questionnaire: structure, re -
liability and validity. Clinical Psychology & Psy -
chotherapy, 6, 297-307.
Verkuil, B., Brosschot, J. F., & Thayer, J. F. (2007).
Capturing worry in daily life: Are trait question -
naires sufficient? Behaviour Research and Ther -
apy, 45, 1835-1844.
Wells, A. & Papageorgiou, C. (1998). Relationships
between worry, obsessive-compulsive symptoms
and meta-cognitive beliefs. Behavior Research
and Therapy, 36, 899-913.
William, K. (2002). No time to Worry: The relationship
between worry, time structure, and time man -
agement. Personality and Individual Differences,
, 1119-1126.
Wisocki, P., Handen, B., & Morse, C. (1986). The
worry scale as a measure of anxiety: anxiety
among the homebound and community active
elderly. Behavior Therapist, 5, 91-95.
Zhong, J., Wang, C., Li, J., & Liu, J. (2009). Penn
State Worry Questionnaire: structure and psy -
chometric properties of the Chinese version.
Journal of Zheijang University Science B, 10(3),
-218.
