Ο Μεσολαβητικός Ρόλος της Εχθρικής Απόδοσης Αιτιότητας στη Σχέση της Προσωπικότητας με τον Κυβερνο-Εκφοβισμό
Δημοσιευμένα:
Ιουν 15, 2019
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
κυβερνο-εκφοβισμός προσωπικότητα εχθρική απόδοση αιτιότητας μεσολάβηση παρέμβαση
Περίληψη
Στόχος της παρούσας έρευνας ήταν η διερεύνηση της σχέσης των πέντε μεγάλων παραγόντων προσωπικότητας, της Εχθρικής Απόδοσης Αιτιότητας και του κυβερνο-εκφοβισμού σε 347 Έλληνες μαθητές Δημοτικού (ΣΤ’) και Γυμνασίου. Με σκοπό να διερευνηθεί εάν η επίδραση των χαρακτηριστικών προσωπικότητας στον κυβερνο-εκφοβισμό εξηγείται καλύτερα μέσω της Εχθρικής Απόδοσης Αιτιότητας, πραγματοποιήθηκε ανάλυση μεσολάβησης. Τα αποτελέσματα έδειξαν ότι η Εχθρική Απόδοση Αιτιότητας μεσολαβεί μεταξύ του υψηλού νευρωτισμού και της χαμηλής εξωστρέφειας και του κυβερνο-εκφοβισμού. Συνολικά, αναδεικνύεται ότι τα λιγότερο κοινωνικά άτομα με χαμηλή συναισθηματική σταθερότητα είναι πιθανότερο να εκδηλώσουν κυβερνο-εκφοβισμό εξαιτίας της τάσης τους να αποδίδουν εχθρική πρόθεση, συμπεριφορές που μπορεί να επιδεινωθούν κατά την ηλεκτρονικά διαμεσολαβούμενη επικοινωνία, η οποία συχνά παρέχει περιορισμένες κοινωνικές ενδείξεις στον χρήστη. Τα ευρήματα μπορούν να συμβάλλουν στην αντιμετώπιση του κυβερνο-εκφοβισμού, μέσω παρεμβάσεων που βοηθούν τους μαθητές να ερμηνεύουν τις διφορούμενες κοινωνικές αλληλεπιδράσεις.
Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
- Πώς να δημιουργήσετε Αναφορές
-
Κόκκινος Κ., Αντωνιάδου Ν., & Βουλγαρίδου Ι. (2019). Ο Μεσολαβητικός Ρόλος της Εχθρικής Απόδοσης Αιτιότητας στη Σχέση της Προσωπικότητας με τον Κυβερνο-Εκφοβισμό. Ψυχολογία: το περιοδικό της Ελληνικής Ψυχολογικής Εταιρείας, 24(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.22388
- Τεύχος
- Τόμ. 24 Αρ. 1 (2019)
- Ενότητα
- ΕΙΔΙΚΟ ΑΦΙΕΡΩΜΑ
Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Το περιοδικό ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑ έχει υιοθετήσει μία πολιτική Platinum open-access. Τα έξοδα υποβολής, επεξεργασίας ή δημοσίευσης των εργασιών καλύπτονται από την Ελληνική Ψυχολογική Εταιρεία. Τα πνευματικά δικαιώματα των δημοσιευμένων εργασιών προστατεύονται από την άδεια 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International'. Οι Συγγραφείς διατηρούν τα Πνευματικά Δικαιώματα και χορηγούν στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης. Η άδεια αυτή επιτρέπει σε τρίτους, να χρησιμοποιούν την εργασία σε οποιαδήποτε μορφή, με την προϋπόθεση της διατήρησης των διατυπώσεων που προβλέπονται στην άδεια σχετικά με την αναφορά στον αρχικό δημιουργό και την αρχική δημοσίευση στο περιοδικό ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑ. Επιπλέον, κάθε διανομή της εργασίας οφείλει να γίνεται με τους ίδιους όρους διανομής, δηλαδή με την ίδια άδεια Creative Commons.
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Psychology, 53, 27–51.
Anderson, J. C., &Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. PsychologicalBulletin, 103, 411-423.
Αντωνιάδου, Ν., & Κόκκινος, Κ. Μ. (2013). Κυβερνοεκφοβισμός και κυβερνοθυματοποίηση σε παιδιά και εφήβους: Συχνότητα εμφάνισης και παράγοντες επικινδυνότητας. Προσχολική&ΣχολικήΕκπαίδευση, 1, 138-169.
Andreou, E. (2000). Bully/victim problems and their association with psychological constructs in 8- to 12-year-old Greek schoolchildren. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 49-56.
Andreou, E. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27, 339-351.
Andreou, E., Didaskalou, E., &Vlachou, A. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of a curriculum‐based anti‐bullying intervention program in Greek primary schools. Educational Psychology, 27, 693-711.
Antoniadou, N., Kokkinos, C. M., & Markos, A. (2016). Development, construct validation and measurement invariance of the Greek cyber-bullying/victimization experiences questionnaire (CBVEQ-G). Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 380-390.
Antoniadou, N., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2018). Empathy in Traditional and Cyber Bullying/Victimization Involvement from Early to Middle Adolescence: A Cross Sectional Study. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 8, 153-161.
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.
Belsey, B. (2005). Cyberbullying: An emerging threat to the «always on» generation. Retrieved from http://www.cyberbullying.ca/pdf/feature_dec2005.pdf
Bak, M. (2015). Social Information Processing Links to Cyber-bullying in Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective (Doctoral dissertation). https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/bitstream/handle/1828/6736/Bak_Michal_MA_2015.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
Barlett, C. P., & Anderson, C. A. (2012). Direct and indirect relations between the Big 5 personality traits and aggressive and violent behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 870-875.
Barlett, C., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). A meta‐analysis of sex differences in cyber‐bullying behavior: The moderating role of age. Aggressive behavior, 40, 474-488.
Barlinska, J., Szuster, A., &Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 37-51.
Bauman, S. (2013). Cyberbullying: What does research tell us? Theory into Practice, 52, 249-256.
Bollmer, J. M., Harris, M. J., &Milich, R. (2006). Reactions to bullying and peer victimization: Narratives, physiological arousal, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 803-828.
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary–developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and psychopathology, 17, 271-301.
Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1128-1135.
Cantone, E., Piras, A. P., Vellante, M., Preti, A., Daníelsdóttir, S., D’Aloja, E., ... &Bhugra, D. (2015). Interventions on bullying and cyberbullying in schools: A systematic review. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 11, 58-76.
Cavalcanti, J. G., & Pimentel, C. E. (2016). Personality and aggression: A contribution of the General Aggression Model. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 33, 443-451.
Çelik, S., Atak, H., &Erguzen, A. (2012). The Effect of Personality on Cyberbullying among University Students in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 129-150.
Chen, P., Coccaro, E. F., & Jacobson, K. C. (2012). Hostile attributional bias, negative emotional responding, and aggression in adults: Moderating effects of gender and impulsivity. Aggressive behavior, 38, 47-63.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Crick, N. R., Grotpeter, J. K., &Bigbee, M. A. (2002). Relationally and physically aggressive children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. Child Development, 73, 1134–1142.
Cross, D., Li, Q., Smith, P. K., & Monks, H. (2012). Understanding and preventing cyberbullying: Where have we been and where should we be going? In Q. Li, D. Cross, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 287-305). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
Della Cioppa, V., O' Neil, A., & Craig, W. (2015). Learning from traditional bullying interventions: Α review of research on cyberbullying and best practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 61-68.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.
Dodge, K. A., Malone, P. S., Lansford, J. E., Sorbring, E., Skinner, A. T., Tapanya, S., ... Pastorelli, C. (2015). Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 9310–9315.
Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018). Development of a measure of adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Journal of Children and Media, 1-17.
Festl, R., &Quandt, T. (2013). Social relations and cyberbullying: The influence of individual and structural attributes on victimization and perpetration via the internet. Human communication research, 39, 101-126.
Fite, J. E., Goodnight, J. A., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2008). Adolescent aggression and social cognition in the context of personality: Impulsivity as a moderator of predictions from social information processing. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 511–520.
Froeschle Hicks, J., Le Clair, B., & Berry, S. (2016). Using Solution-Focused Dramatic Empathy Training to Eliminate Cyber-Bullying. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 11, 378-390.
Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2016). Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC Social Competence Program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber‐victimization: Class and individual level moderators. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 181-193.
Guarino, L., Roger, D., &Olason, D. T. (2007). Reconstructing N: A new approach to measuring emotional sensitivity. Current Psychology, 26, 37–45.
Hawkins, K. A., &Cougle, J. R. (2013). Effects of interpretation training on hostile attribution bias and reactivity to interpersonal insult. Behavior Therapy, 44, 479-488.
Helfritz-Sinville, L. E., & Stanford, M. S. (2014). Hostile attribution bias in impulsive and premeditated aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 45–50.
Hessels, C., van den Hanenberg, D., de Castro, B. O., & van Aken, M. A. (2014). Relationships: Empirical contribution. Understanding personality pathology in adolescents: The five factor model of personality and social information processing. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 121–142.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
Jackson, L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Pure-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6-23.
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Adams, R., Perry, D. G., Workman, K. A., Furdella, J. Q., & Egan, S. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224-251.
Johnstone, L., & Cooke, D. J. (2004). Psychopathic‐like traits in childhood: Conceptual and measurement concerns. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 103-125.
Klimstra, T. A., Hale, W. W., Raaijmakers, Q. A., Branje, S. J., &Meeus, W. H. (2009). Maturation of personality in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 898–912
Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., Dalara, E., Koufogazou, A., & Papatziki, A. (2013). Cyber-bullying, personality traits and coping strategies in pre-adolescent students. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 3, 55-69.
Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., & Markos, A. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An Investigation of the psychological profile of University student participants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 204-214.
Kokkinos, C. M., Baltzidis, E., &Xynogala, D. (2016). Prevalence and personality correlates of Facebook bullying among university undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 840-850.
Kokkinos, C. M., Karagianni, K., &Voulgaridou, I. (2017). Relational aggression, big five and hostile attribution bias in Adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 52, 101-113.
Kokkinos, C. M., &Voulgaridou, I. (2017). Relational and cyber aggression among adolescents: Personality and emotion regulation as moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 528-537.
Koolen, S., Poorthuis, A., & van Aken, M. A. (2012). Cognitive distortions and self-regulatory personality traits associated with proactive and reactive aggression in early adolescence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 776–787.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 22-30.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., &Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073-1137.
Krueger, R. F., Hicks, B. M., &McGue, M. (2001). Altruism and antisocial behavior: Independent tendencies, unique personality correlates, distinct etiologies. Psychological Science, 12, 397-402.
Lazuras, L., &Ourda, D. (2012). Cyberbullying in adolescence: A social cognitive study. In H. Tsorbatzoudis, L. Lazuras, V. Barkoukis (Eds.), Cyberbullying in Greece: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 175-194). Thessaloniki: Copy City Press.
Lazuras, L., Pyżalski, J., Barkoukis, V., &Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2012). Empathy and moral disengagement in adolescent cyberbullying: Implications for educational intervention and pedagogical practice.StudiaEdukacyjne, 23, 57-69.
Makri-Botsari, E., &Paraskeva, F. (2010). Exploring the personality characteristics in information and digital age expertise. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1705-1716.
Markos, A., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2017). Development of a short form of the big five questionnaire for children: Validation in preadolescent samples. Personality andIndividual Differences, 112, 12–17.
Mathieson, L. C., Murray-Close, D., Crick, N. R., Woods, K. E., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., Geiger, T. C., & Morales, J. R. (2011). Hostile intent attributions and relational aggression: The moderating roles of emotional sensitivity, gender, and victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 977–987.
Meier, B. P., Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2008). Bringing out the agreeableness in everyone: Using a cognitive self-regulation model to reduce aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1383–1387.
Mendes, D. D., Mari, J. D. J., Singer, M., Barros, G. M., & Mello, A. F. (2009). Study review of biological, social and environmental factors associated with aggressive behavior. Revistabrasileira de psiquiatria, 31, 77-85.
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., & Jones, S. (2008). Externalizing behavior through the lens of the five-factor model: A focus on agreeableness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 158–164.
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D., &Leukefeld, C. (2003). Examining antisocial behavior through the lens of the five-factor model of personality. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 29, 497-514.
Mitsopoulou, E., &Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61-72.
Mullins-Sweat, N. S., &Widiger, A. T. (2006). The five-factor model of personality disorder: A translation across science and practice. In R. F. Krueger, & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 39–70).New York: Guilford Press.
Muris, P. E. H. M., Meesters, C. M. G., &Diederen, R. M. H. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Big Five Questionnaire for Children (BFQ-C) in a Dutch sample of young adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1757-1769.
Muthén, L. K., &Muthén, B. O (2015). MplusUser’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA:Muthén&Muthén.
Nelson, D. A., & Coyne, S. M. (2009). Children's intent attributions and feelings of distress: Associations with maternal and paternal parenting practices. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 223–237.
Nelson, D. A., Mitchell, C., & Yang, C. (2008). Intent attributions and aggression: A study of children and their parents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 793–806.
Olweus, D. (2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 520–538.
Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2010). The Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: Implementation and evaluation over two decades. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), The handbook of school bullying: An international perspective (pp. 277-402). New York: Routledge.
Paul, S., Smith, P. K., & Blumberg, H. H. (2010). Addressing cyberbullying in school using the quality circle approach. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 157-168.
Phillips-Shyrock, S. (2014). A Mixed Methods Study of Cyberbullying: Student, Educator, and Parent/Guardian Perspectives and Implications for Prevention and Intervention(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Pennsylvania.
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81–94.
Psycharis, S., Makri-Botsari, E., &Xynogalas, G. (2008, November). The use of educational robotics for the teaching of Physics and its relation to self-esteem. Paper presented in the International Conference on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots, Venice, Italy.
Pullmann, H., Raudsepp, L., &Allik, J. (2006). Stability and change in adolescents' personality: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 20, 447–459
Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564-575.
Runions, K. C., &Bak, M. (2015). Online moral disengagement, cyberbullying, and cyber-aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 400-405.
Runions, K. C. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42, 751-771.
Runions, K. C., & Keating, D. P. (2010). Anger and inhibitory control as moderators of children's hostile attributions and aggression. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 370–378.
Schacter, H. (2013). Cyberbullying in Elementary School: The Role of Hostile Attribution Bias in Children’s Social Information Processing. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/91e5/a764357e504a0f38cced9eac3f4c7bd24815.pdf
Scholte, R. H., van Lieshout, C. F., de Wit, C. A., & van Aken, M. A. (2005). Adolescent personality types and subtypes and their psychosocial adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1982, 258-286.
Schumann, L., Craig, W., &Rosu, A. (2013). Power differentials in bullying: Individuals in a community context. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 846-865.
Seibert, L. A., Miller, J. D., Pryor, L. R., Reidy, D. E., &Zeichner, A. (2010). Personality and laboratory-based aggression: Comparing the predictive power of the five-factor model, BIS/BAS, and impulsivity across context. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 13–21.
Semerci, A. (2017). Investigating the effects of personality traits on cyberbullying. Journal of Education and Instruction, 7, 211-230.
Slonje, S., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147-154.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M. &Tippett, N. (2006). An investigation into cyberbullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyberbullying. Research Brief No. RBX03-06. DfES, London
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., &Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, andAllied Disciplines, 49, 376-385.
Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of personality and social psychology, 100, 330.
Strom, P. S., & Strom, R. D. (2005). Cyberbullying by adolescents: A preliminary assessment. The Educational Forum, 70, 21-36.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology& Behavior, 7, 321-326.
Tsimtsiou, Z., Haidich, A. B., Drontsos, A., Dantsi, F., Sekeri, Z., Drosos, E., ... &Arvanitidou, M. (2017). Pathological Internet use, cyberbullying and mobile phone use in adolescence: a school-based study in Greece. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health.DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2016-0115.
van Geel, M., Goemans, A., Toprak, F., &Vedder, P. (2017). Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the Big Five, Dark Triad and sadism. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 231-235.
Varjas, K., Talley, J., Meyers, J., Parris, L. &Cutts, H. (2010). High school students’ perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11, 269-273.
Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Trait anger and cyberbullying among young adults: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and moral identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 519-526.
Weisberg, Y. J., DeYoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 178.
White, P. A. (1990). Ideas about causation in philosophy and psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 3-18.
Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). The anatomy of anger: An integrative cognitive model of trait anger and reactive aggression. Journal of Personality, 78, 9–38.
Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver-child relationships, internet use, and personal characteristics. JournalofAdolescence, 27, 319-336.
