DISCUSSION - Positive Psychology: Small steps towards renewing and expanding the sound tradition of subjectivity


Published: Nov 22, 2020
Keywords:
happiness Positive Psychology subjectivity objectivity well-being
Panos Kordoutis
Abstract

The basic tenets of Positive Psychology derive from the philosophical traditions of Utilitarianism, Virtues, and Eudaimonia theorizing, and Hedonism. However, its unique and original contribution to Psychology lies in empirically operationalizing the definition of well-being. Moreover, it has proposed a theoretical framework consisting of, also, operationally defined socio-psychological processes associated with well-being: (a) interacting within social relationships and contexts, (b) developing traits (e.g. personal strengths), (c) pursuing states of existence (happiness, pleasure) and (d) experiencing seamless functioning (e.g. meaning). These processes concern and render with theoretical cohesion most of the research and interventions within Positive Psychology. Nevertheless, and even though social and relational contexts have been an integral part of the cohesive model of Positive Psychology from the outset, rarely are they reflected in pertinent research in a way other than that of subjective representations. The six papers presented in this journal fall into the aforementioned fourfold cohesive theoretical approach of Positive Psychology and nearly all, respond to the above criticism by taking into account relational or social contextual factors and by employing different strategies for their representation or actual estimation..  All papers in this special issue are good examples of how evidence-based understanding can support and feed into effective intervention planning and applications, a goal that follows steadily Positive Psychology since its inception.

Article Details
  • Section
  • SPECIAL SECTION
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Biswas-Diener, R., Linley, P. A., Govindji, R., & Woolston, L. (2011). Positive psychology as a force for social change. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 410–418). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373585.003.0027
Brennan, R. (2003). History and Systems of Psychology. Prentice Hall.
Cabanas, E. & Illouz, E. (2019). Manufacturing happy citizens. How the Science and Industry of Happiness Control our Lives. Polity Press.
Carlisle, S., Henderson, G., & Hanlon, P. W. (2009). ‘Wellbeing’: A collateral casualty of modernity? Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1556– 1560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.029
Diener, E., & Diener, C. (2011). Monitoring psychosocial prosperity for social change. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology as social change (pp. 53–71). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9938-9_4
Kubokawa, A., & Ottaway, A. (2009). Positive psychology and cultural sensitivity: A review of the literature. Graduate Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1, 130–138.
Keyes, C. L. M., & Shapiro, A. D. (2004). Social Well-Being in the United States: A Descriptive Epidemiology. In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation series on mental health and development. Studies on successful midlife development. How healthy are we?: A national study of well-being at midlife (p. 350–372). The University of Chicago Press.
Lambert, L., Passmore H. & Holder, M. (2015). Foundational Frameworks of Positive Psychology: Mapping Well-Being Orientations. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 56, 3, 311–321
Linley, P., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., & Wood, A. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760500372796
Meyers, M. Ch., Woerkom, M. & Bakker A. (2013). The added value of the positive: A literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 5618-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.694689
Neff, K. D., & Costigan, A. P. (2014). Self-Compassion, Well-Being, and Happiness. Psychologie in Österreich, 2, 114-119.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev .psych.52.1.141
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Yen, J. (2010). Authorizing happiness: Rhetorical demarcation of science and society in historical narratives of positive psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 30, 67–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019103
Most read articles by the same author(s)