The effects of morphophonological changes on the training of orthographic structure of compounds: an Intervention study


Published: Jun 7, 2021
Keywords:
Educational intervention compounds morphophonological transparency spelling typical spellers
Styliani N. Tsesmeli
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2689-9064
Eirini Tsellou
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4739-2270
Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the training of morphological awareness of spelling words by 27 students following 4th and 6th grades of a primary school. They were compared with a group of 26 classmates who did not take part in the intervention. All students were assessed via standardized tests of spelling and reading comprehension and non-standardized tests of analogy and meaning of compounds. The intervention included a pre-test, an educational program and a post-test. Experimental material entailed compound words categorized into two conditions of morphophonological transparency (transparent/ non-transparent) and two conditions of compositionality (Modern Greek/Ancient Greek morphemes). Results showed that the systematic exercise of the morphological structure of words improved students' spelling performance in every compound type. Considerably, non-transparent items entailing ancient morphemes received the highest gains, where students presented the lowest performance before intervention. These findings underline the importance of morphological awareness in the acquisition of spelling of morphologically complex vocabulary, whose teaching is important in the highest grades of primary school.

Article Details
  • Section
  • RESEARCH PAPERS
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
Styliani N. Tsesmeli, University of Patras
Department of Education and Social Work, School of Humanities & Social Sciences
Eirini Tsellou, University of Patras
Department of Education and Social Work, School of Humanities & Social Sciences
References
Apel, K., & Diehm, E. (2014). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarteners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: A small efficacy study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0022219413509964.
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141 – 163. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10936-0099130.
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: a systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144-179. https://doi.org/ 10.3102/00346543093 59353.
Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710390227369.
Carlisle, J. F., Stone, A., & Katz, L. A. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249-274. https://doi.org/0.1007/s11881-001-0013-2.
Casalis, S., Pacton, S., Lefevre, F. & Fayol, M. (2018). Morphological training in spelling: Immediate and long-term effects of an interventional study in French third graders. Learning and Instruction, 53, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.009.
Deacon, S. H., Campbell, E., Tamminga, M. & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Seeing the harm in harmed and harmful: Morphological processing by children in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 759-775. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000238.
Deacon, H., Cleave, P. L., Baylis, J., Fraser, J., Ingram, E., & Perlmutter, S. (2014). The representation of roots in the spelling of children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509965.
Dugard, P., & Todman, J. (1995). Analysis of pre-test- post-test control group designs in educational research. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 15, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341950150207.
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-0100041-x.
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257-285. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10888438.2012.689791.
Goodwin, A. P., Gilbert, J. K., Kearns, D. M., & Cho, S. J. (2014). Probing lexical representations: Simultaneous modeling of word and person contributions to multidimensional lexical representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 448-468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034754.
Grigorakis, I. & Manolitsis, G. (2020). Longitudinal effects of diferent aspects of morphological awareness skills on early spelling development. Reading and Writing, 34, 945-979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10098-2.
Kargl, R., & Landerl, (2018). Beyond phonology: The role of morphological and orthographic spelling skills in German. Topics in Language Disorders, 38, 272–285.
Κλαίρης, Χ., & Μπαμπινιώτης, Γ. (2011). Γραμματική της νέας ελληνικής. Κέντρο Λεξικολογίας.
Lieber, R., & Stěkauer, P. (2009) (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of compounding. University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.001.0001.
Manolitsis, G. (2017). How effective is morphological awareness instruction on early literacy skills? In MacLachlan, C. J. & Arrow, A. W. (Eds.), Literacy in the early years: Reflections on international research and practice (pp. 151–174). Springer.
McCutchen, D., Stull, S, Herrera, B. L., Lotas, S., & Evans, S. (2014). Putting words to work: Effects of morphological instruction on children’s writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 86-97. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0022219413509969.
Μουζάκη, Α., Πρωτόπαπας, Α., Σιδερίδης, Γ., & Σίμος, Π. (2007). Διερεύνηση των ψυχομετρικών χαρακτηριστικών μιας δοκιμασίας ορθογραφικής δεξιότητας μαθητών Β΄, Γ΄, Δ΄ και Ε΄ τάξης του δημοτικού σχολείου. Επιστήμες της Αγωγής, 1, 129-146.
Μπαμπινιώτης, Γ. (1998). Θεωρητική γλωσσολογία: Εισαγωγή στη σύγχρονη γλωσσολογία. Αθήνα.
Μπαμπινιώτης, Γ. (2016). Λεξικό των Παραγώγων και Συνθέτων της Νέας Ελληνικής. Κέντρο Λεξικολογίας.
Nagy, W. E., Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 91-108. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/RRQ.011.
Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 3-12. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 0022219413509967.
Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving Literacy by Teaching Morphemes. Routledge.
Ράλλη, Α. (2005). Μορφολογία. Εκδόσεις Πατάκη.
Ramirez, G., Walton, P., & Roberts, W. (2014). Morphological awareness and vocabulary development among kindergarteners with different ability levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 54-64. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0022219413509970.
Seymour, P. H. K., Arο, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174. https://doi.org/ 10.1348/000712603321661859.
Seymour, P. H. K., & Duncan, L. G. (2001). Learning to read in English. Ψυχολογία, 8, 281-299.
Smart Technologies ULC (2007). Smart Notebook software (Version 10.0) [Computer software]. Canada.
Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). LEA Publishers.
Τάφα, Ε. (1995). Τεστ ανίχνευσης της Αναγνωστικής Ικανότητας. Ελληνικά Γράμματα.
To, N. L., Tighe, E. L., &Binder, K. S. (2014). Investigating morphological awareness and the processing of transparent and opaque words in adults with low literacy skills and in skilled readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 1-18. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ 1467-9817.12036.
Tsesmeli, S. N. & Tsirozi, Th. (2015). Teaching compound words to a spelling-disabled child via Smart Notebook Technology: a case study approach. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 8, 33-45.
Τσεσμελή, Σ. Ν. & Κουτσελάκη, Δ. (2011). Μεταγλωσσικοί παράγοντες στην κατάκτηση της ορθογραφικής δεξιότητας σύνθετων λέξεων από μαθητές δημοτικού σχολείου. Στο: Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα, 31, 496-507.
Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19, 587-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9011-4.
Τσεσμελή, Σ. Ν., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2007). Μορφολογική δομή των παράγωγων λέξεων και ορθογραφική επίδοση δυσλεξικών μαθητών: μια μελέτη παρέμβασης, Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 4, 86-110.
Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2009). The effects of training of morphological structure on spelling derived words by dyslexic adolescents. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 565-592. https://doi.org/ 10.1348/000712608X371915.
Tsesmeli N. S. (2017). Spelling and meaning of compounds in the early school years through classroom games: An intervention study, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2071. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02071.
Wolter, J. A., & Dilworth, V. (2014). The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 76-85. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0022219413509972.