The contribution of action research to the implementation of cooperative learning in a preschool classroom


Published: Dec 20, 2024
Keywords:
cooperative learning preschool education action research reflective educator
Eleni Nikoloudaki
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6223-1416
Dimitris Alexakis
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5080-3526
Abstract

This article presents the contribution of action research to the implementation of cooperative learning in a preschool classroom. More specifically, the paper presents the process and results of an action research carried out in a public Kindergarten in Rethimno-Greece during the school year 2022-2023. The sample consisted of 15 children, at the beginning of the school year, while after March the class group was enriched and consisted of 20 children. 


In the context of the new curriculum for preschool education in Greece, cooperative learning is a key element of teaching.  Despite the significant benefits of cooperative learning, research shows that teachers encounter significant difficulties in preparing children for cooperative interactions. In cooperative learning, the teacher must make important decisions and also answer pressing dilemmas regarding the organization of the learning process. As the new curriculum for preschool education also acknowledges, these decisions concern a) the way the teams are formed, b) the determination of the nature of collaborative activities, c) the support of the division and the assumption of specific roles, d) the development of interactions and relationships both within the groups as well as between the groups and finally e) the presentation, evaluation and feedback of the groups (Penderi, et al., 2022).


In the present study, the teacher-researcher and the facilitator participated in action research. The participants met regularly in order to plan, implement and evaluate the implementation of cooperative learning and teaching. A total of 13 meetings were held during the school year.


The teacher-researcher considered that cooperative learning is an important element in the organization of the learning process in preschool education, while she expressed the need to improve her pedagogical practice in this particular field. The teacher-researcher implemented eight didactic scenarios of cooperative learning and collected data both regarding the implementation of cooperative learning and its effect on the children.


To collect research data, the teacher-researcher kept a research journal following specific observation axes concerning children’s; interactions, but also teacher’s reactions when children were working in groups.  At the end of the school year, the teacher-researcher also wrote a reflection report. The facilitator kept a research journal from his meetings with the teacher-researcher in order to support the implementation of cooperative learning and also to reflect on the research process itself. Also, a total of three sociometric measures were conducted to detect the children's social relationships before and after the implementation of cooperative learning. Self-assessment rubrics were used by the children themselves, usually after the completion of group activities.  Rubrics were formulated by the teacher-researcher, and aimed at assessing indicators of children's engagement, cooperation and well-being.


Data analysis regarding the implementation of cooperative learning indicated on the one hand the difficulties and dilemmas of the teacher-researcher during the implementation of the teaching scenarios, and on the other hand the enrichment of her personal theory. These difficulties concern the separation of the groups, the type and level of cooperation, the role of the teacher during the implementation of cooperative learning and finally the relationship between the individual development of the children and cooperative learning.  Regarding the effect of cooperative learning on children, the data analysis showed the development of children's cooperative skills and the enrichment of their social interactions. According to the teacher's diary there were obvious differences in the way the children worked together within the group. They could support weaker students, discuss a topic and share responsibilities. Additionally, children preferred to play in groups in their free play, they made group constructions and asked the teacher to present them to their classmates.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Scientific columns
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abramcsyk, A., & Jurkowski, S. (2020). Cooperative learning as an evidence-based teaching strategy: what teachers know, believe, and how they use it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1733402
Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C., & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24 (2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000160146
Aikins, J. W., & Litwack, S. D. (2011). Prosocial skills, social competence, and popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 140–164). The Guilford Press.
Altrichter, H., Posch, P. & Somekh, B. (2001). Οι εκπαιδευτικοί ερευνούν το έργο τους. Μια εισαγωγή στις μεθόδους της έρευνας δράσης (Μ. Δεληγιάννη, Μετ.). Μεταίχμιο.
Andrade, B. F., Waschbusch, D. A., King, S., Thurston, C., McNutt, L., & Terrio, B. (2005). Teacher-classified peer social status: Preliminary validation and associations with behavior ratings. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300306
Αυγητίδου, Σ. (2014). Οι εκπαιδευτικοί ως ερευνητές και ως στοχαζόμενοι εκπαιδευτικοί. Gutenberg.
Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfrey, C., & Volpé Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673
Ferreira, M., Aguiar, C., Correia, N., Fialho, A., & Pimentel, J. (2017). Social experiences of children with disabilities in inclusive Portuguese preschool settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116679414
Θεοδοσιάδου, Κ. (2015). Κοινωνική δικαιοσύνη και κριτικός αναστοχασμός εκπαιδευτικών της Πρωτοβάθμιας και Δευτεροβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης. Επιστήμες Αγωγής, 3, 6-19.
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110
Johnson, D., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47-62. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47
Καζέλα, Κ. (2009). Ομαδοσυνεργατική διδασκαλία και μάθηση στην προσχολική εκπαίδευση. Θεωρία και πρακτικές εφαρμογές. Οδυσσέας.
Κατσαρού, Ελ. (2016). Εκπαιδευτική έρευνα-δράση. Πολυπαραδειγματική διερεύνηση για την αναμόρφωση της εκπαιδευτικής πράξης. Κριτική.
Kiuru, N., Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., Pakarinen, E., Poskiparta, E., Ahonen, T., & Nurmi, J. E. (2015). Positive teacher and peer relations combine to predict primary school students’ academic skill development. Developmental Psychology, 51(4), 434–446. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0038911
Κουτρούμπα, Κ., Βούλγαρη, Ρ. & Αντωνοπούλου, Α. (2020). Εκπαιδευτικός Αναστοχασμός. Η μεταγνωστική ανατροφοδότηση στη διδακτική πράξη. Επιστήμες Αγωγής, 1, 112-128. https://doi.org/10.26248/.v2020i1.772
Koutselini, M. (2008/2009). Teacher misconceptions and understanding of cooperative learning: An intervention study. Journal of Classroom Interaction 43(2), 34–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23869676
Kyndt, E., Raes, E. Bart, L., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
Μπίκος, Κ. (2011). Αλληλεπίδραση και κοινωνικές σχέσεις στη σχολική τάξη. Ελληνικά Γράμματα.
Πεντέρη, Ε., Χλαπάνα, Ε., Μέλλιου, Κ., Φιλιππίδη, Α., & Μαρινάτου, Θ. (2022). Οδηγός νηπιαγωγού-Υποστηρικτικό υλικό. Πυξίδα: Θεωρητικό και Μεθοδολογικό Πλαίσιο-Πρακτικές Εφαρμογές και Διδακτικοί Σχεδιασμοί. Στο πλαίσιο της Πράξης «Αναβάθμιση των Προγραμμάτων Σπουδών και Δημιουργία Εκπαιδευτικού Υλικού Πρωτοβάθμιας και Δευτεροβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης» του ΙΕΠ με MIS 5035542
Öztürk, B. (2023). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Models on Learning Outcomes: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18 (3), 273-296. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.600.13
Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. (2007). Opportunities to learn in America’s elementary classrooms. Science, 315, 1795–1796. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139719
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
Roseth, C., Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223
Sharan, Y. 2010. Cooperative Learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01430.x
Wilt, F., Veen, C., Kruistum, C., & Oers. B. (2018). Popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, or average: Do young children of different sociometric groups differ in their level of oral communicative competence? Social Development, 27(4), 793–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12316
Zisopoulou, Ε. (2019). Collaborative learning in kindergarten: Challenge or reality? Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 3(2), 335-351. https://doi.org/10.24130/eccd-jecs.1967201932113