Epirus region teachers’ views on the contribution of the museum in science education


Athina - Christina Kornelaki
Professor of Science Education
Abstract

The paper is part of a broader research that aims at the synergy between formal and non-formal education in the field of science education and follows the phases of an expansive learning cycle. The present paper focuses on the analysis of the existing situation (second phase of the cycle) which precedes the design of a training seminar for the teachers (third phase of the cycle). The paper presents empirical research which follows the mixed method collecting and analysing quantitative as well as qualitative data. In particular, it employs a questionnaire (n=149) and some semi-structured interviews from a group of teachers (n=9). The research questions of the paper concern 1) in-service primary education teachers’ views on the contribution of the museums of general interest in science education and 2) the contradictions teachers deal with in the frame of the existing relation between school and museum under a cultural-historical perspective. Despite the difficulties presented by the teachers and manifested as contradictions, the involved teachers recognize the importance of non-formal education and express their intention to either participate or design themselves and implement science education programs in museums of general interest.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aaron Price, C., & Chiu, A. (2018): An experimental study of a museum-based, science PD programme’s impact on teachers and their students, International Journal of Science Education, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1457816
Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development programme. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653–80.
Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary. Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6, 4.
Astor-Jack, T., Balcerzak, P., & McCallie, E. (2006). Professional Development and the Historical Tradition of Informal Science Institutions: Views of Four Providers. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, & Technology Education, 6(1), 67-81.
Bevan, B., Dillon, J., Hein, G. E., Macdonald, M., Michalchik, V., Miller, D., & Yoon, S. (2010). Making science matter: Collaborations between informal science education organizations and schools. Washington, DC: Centre for Advancement of Informal Science Education.
Blank, R. K., de las Alas, N., & Smith, C. (2008). Does teacher professional development have effects on teaching and learning?: Analysis of evaluation findings from programmes for mathematics and science teachers in 14 states. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Blunden, A. (2013). Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Glossary of Terms. Retrieved from https://www.ethicalpolitics.org/ablunden/pdfs/Glossary_of_Cultural_Historical_Activity.pdf
Boeren, E., Nicaise, I., & Baert, H. (2012) Adult learners' satisfaction and its relation to characteristics of the individual and the educational institution, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(2), 132-149 DOI: 10.1080/1554480X.2012.655887.
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based professional development: What does it take to support teachers in learning about inquiry and nature of science? International Journal of Science Education, 35, 1947–1978.
Chatterji, M. (2005). Evidence on “What Works”: An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 14–24.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). London: Routledge.
Conforti, M. E., Chaparro, M. G., Degele, P. E., Díez Fernández Lomana, J. C. (2018). Visitor profiling at the Museum of Human Evolution of Burgos (Spain). Journal of Science Communication, 17(4), 1-21.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Daniels, H., & Johnson, P. (2014). Researching technologies for enhancing collective creativity. In Sannino, A. & Ellis, V (Eds.), Learning and collectivity creativity: Activity theoretical and sociocultural studies. (pp. 132 – 157). New York, NY: Routeledge.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R-L. Punamääki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2000). From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies (pp. 150–166). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
European Commission. (2007). Science education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Falk, J., Needham, M., Dierking, L., & Prendergast, L. (2014). International science centre impact study:Final report. Corvallis, OR: John H. Falk Research.
Georgopoulou, P., & Koliopoulos, D. (2017). Archaeological museums as environments of informal and non-formal science and technological education: The case of Educative Islets, Edmuse Conference, Rome, Italy: Research Gate, (100-103).
Hughes, C., & Cosbey, A. (2016). Exploring the Intersections of Science and History Learning. Journal of Museum Education, 41(3), 174-184. DOI:10.1080/10598650.2016.1193306
Isaac, G., Barma, S., & Romero, M. (2021). Cultural historical activity theory, double stimulation, and conflicts of motives in education science: Where have we been? (2012-2021). Revue internationale du CRIRES: innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 5(2), 86-94.
Kisiel, J. F. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 89(6), 936–955.
Κορνελακη, Α. Χ. (2018). Σχεδιασμός Εκπαιδευτικών Προγραμμάτων από τον κόσμο των Φυσικών Επιστημών για μη τυπικά περιβάλλοντα μάθησης, υπό το πρίσμα της Θεωρίας της Δραστηριότητας (Μη δημοσιευμένη διδακτορική διατριβή). Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων
Kornelaki, A. C., Plakitsi, K. (2018). Thunderbolt hunt. Educational Program for Students from 5 to 9 Years Old in the Archaeological Museum of Ioannina. World Journal of Education, 8(4), 87 – 101.
Κορνελάκη, Α. Χ., & Πλακίτση, Κ. (2022α). Γέφυρες μεταξύ θεμάτων Φυσικών Επιστημών και εκθεμάτων Μουσείων γενικού ενδιαφέροντος υπό το πρίσμα της θεωρίας της Δραστηριότητας και το πλαίσιο σχεδιασμού SCIEPIMGI. Διδασκαλία Φυσικών Επιστημών - Έρευνα & Πράξη, 2022(82-83), 37-65.
Κορνελάκη, Α. Χ., & Πλακίτση, Κ. (2022β). Στάσεις εκπαιδευτικών πρωτοβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης της περιφέρειας Ηπείρου για τη διδασκαλία φυσικών επιστημών. [υποβεβλημένο άρθρο για δημοσίευση].
Lavrakas, P.J. (2008). Encylopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programmes in science. Handbook of Research in Science Education, 2, 889–909.
Metcalfe, J. (2019). Comparing science communication theory with practice: An assessment and critique using Australian data. Public Understanding of Science, 28(4), 382-400.
Mujtaba, T., Lawrence, M., Oliver, M., & Reiss, M.J. (2018). Learning and engagement through natural history museums. Studies in Science Education, 54(1), 41-67. Doi: 10.1080/03057267.2018.1442820
Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A., Moll, A. J., & Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM summer institute: An integrated approach to teacher professional development in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13, 69.
Νάκου, Ει. (2009). Μουσεία, Ιστορίες και Ιστορία. Αθήνα: Νήσος.
Νικονάνου, N. (ed.) (2015). Μουσειακή μάθησηκαι εμπειρία στον 21ο αιώνα. Αθήνα: Kallipos, Open Academic Editions, ISBN: 978-960-603-082-6/ https://repository.kallipos.gr/handle/11419/712
Sannino, A. (2015a). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4 (2015), 1–3.
Sannino, A. (2015b). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6 (2015), 1-15.
Sannino, A., & Ellis, V. (2014). Activity-Theoretical and Sociocultural Approaches to Learning and Collective Creativity: An Introduction. In
Sannino, A. & Ellis, V. (Eds.), Learning and collectivity creativity: Activity theoretical and sociocultural studies. (pp. 1 – 15). New York, NY: Routeledge.
Tal, T., & Steiner, L. (2006). Patterns of teacher-museum staff relationships: School visits to the educational centre of a science museum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(1), 25–46.
Tran, L. U. (2007). Teaching science in museums: The pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91(2), 278–297.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum Press.