Children’s spontaneous production of phrasemes: evidence from Greek‐speaking children (ages 5 to 7).
Published:
Jul 1, 2015
Keywords:
production of phrasemes semantic analysis development of non‐literal competence
Abstract
This study explored the production of phrasemes (idioms, restricted collocations, conventionalized similes and the like) collected from the spontaneous speech of Greek‐speaking children aged 5 – 7. Τhe classification and analysis of phrasemes in children’s speech imply that even young children can use many idiomatic expressions as such, since there are indications that the internal semantics are used, even if the meanings or forms are not always coincide with the adult ones. The findings, consistent with a body of relevant research, are also discussed with respect to the early development of a non‐literal competence in general.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Μότσιου (Eleni Motsiou) Ε. (2015). Children’s spontaneous production of phrasemes: evidence from Greek‐speaking children (ages 5 to 7). Investigating the child’s World, 14, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.12681/icw.17942
- Issue
- Vol. 14 (2015)
- Section
- Scientific articles & educational projects
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abkarian, B.B., Jones, A. & West, G. (1992). Young children’s idiom comprehension: trying to get the picture. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35: 580‐587.
Ackerman, B.P. (1982). On Comprehending Idioms: Do Children Get the Picture? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 33 (3): 439‐454.
Billow, M.R. (1988). Observing Spontaneous Metaphor in Children. Στο Child's Language: A Reader, (ed. M.B. Franklin & S.S. Barten) 314‐326. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gentner, D. (1989). “The Mechanisms of Analogical Reasoning”. Στο S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning: 200‐241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–683.
Caillies, S., & Le Sourn‐Bissaoui, S. (2006). Idiom comprehension in French children: A cock‐and‐bull story. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 189–206.
Cain, K., Towse, A.S. & Knight, R.S. (2009). The Development of Idiom Comprehension: An Investigation of Semantic and Contextual Processing Skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102 (3): 280‐298.
Chukovskij, K. (1963 [1933]). От двух до пяти [From 2 to 5]. (17 edition). Москва: Детгиз.
Epstein, R. & Gamlin, R. (1994). Young children’s comprehension of simple and complex metaphors presented in pictures and words. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9 (3): 179‐191.
Gibbs, R.W. (1991). Semantic Analyzability in Children’s Understanding of Idioms. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34 (3): 613‐620.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Levorato, M.C. & Cacciari, C. (1999). Idiom Comprehension in Children: Are the Effects of Semantic Analyzability and Context Separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 11 (1): 51‐66.
Levorato, M.C., & Cacciari, C. (1995). The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 261‐283.
Motsiou, E. (2012). Lexical innovations (neologisms) in children’s speech: evidence from Greek. Contrastive Linguistics 2: 22‐31, St. Kliment Ochridski University Press.
Nippold, M.A. & Rudzinski, M. (1993). Familiarity and Transparency in Idiom Explanation: A Developmental Study of Children and Adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36 (4): 728‐737.
Nunberg, G. (1979). The Non‐Uniqueness of Semantic Solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (2): 143‐184.
Özçalişkan, S. (2007). Metaphors We Move By: Children's Developing Understanding of Metaphorical Motion in Typologically Distinct Languages. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (2): 147‐168.
Swinney, D. & Cutler, A. (1979). The Access and Processing of Idiomatic Expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 (5): 523‐534.
Titone, D.A. & Connine, C.M. (1999). On the Compositional and Noncompositional Nature of Idiomatic Expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 31 (12): 1655‐1674.
Tseytlin, S. N. (2000). Язык и ребенок: Лингвистика детской речи. [Language and Child: the linguistics of children’s speech]. Мοсква: ВЛАДОС.
Vosniadou, S. (1987). Children and Metaphors. Child Development 58: 870‐885.
Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A.K., Gardner, H. (1976). The Development of Metaphoric Understanding.Child's Language: A Reader (M.B. Franklin & S.S. Barten (eds)): 303‐313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
