The education of gifted students: Global practices and relevant policy in Greece


Published: Jan 22, 2020
Keywords:
Giftedness Gifted/talented students Educative measures Teachers’ training
Βασιλική Ξυθάλη (Xithali Vassiliki)
Abstract
This paper initially describes the content of the concept of giftedness and the relevant approaches which are adopted globally and in Greece. It refers to the four dominant dimensions of the perception of "giftedness" (a) as a cognitive achievement, (b) as an aptitude, (c) as nature or nurture, and (d) as for its orientation towards individuality or collectivism. In addition to the above four dimensions, there is one approach that deliberately ignores giftedness for different reasons in every country in which it is adopted, while another one regards charismatic children as children with special educational needs. The paper also describes the criteria for integrating students into the category of charismatic children according to the Eurydice report (2006). It goes on with the practices and methods of different countries in identifying those students and the biased errors that appear during this process. Subsequently, the ways adopted in order to manage gifted students’ education are presented, which vary from country to country. In the European countries, the educational measures taken for charismatic children may be measures implemented outside or within the school, and within or alongside the formal school curriculum. In Greece, the development of evaluation standards and special educational programs for these pupils is entrusted to Schools or Departments of Universities, while no student can attend a class which is not for his/ her age. Afterwards, the issue of gifted children’s teachers’ training is examined, while those students’ school course and general evolvement is also investigated. Finally, regarding Greece, measures and strategies are proposed, in order for education tailored to the needs of each child –and not only the gifted ones- to be achieved.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Scientific articles & educational projects
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Βασιλική Ξυθάλη (Xithali Vassiliki), University of Ioannina
Δρ. Παν/μίου Ιωαννίνων, Δ/ντρια Δ/νσης Π.Ε. Αν. Αττικής
References
Aljughaiman, A. M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). Growing up under pressure: The cultural and religious context of the Saudi system of gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 307–322.
Aronson, J., & Juarez, L. (2012). Growth mindsets in the laboratory and the real world. In R. Subotnik, & L. Miller (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
Baum, S. M., Hébert, T. P., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 224-235.
Card, D., & Giuliano, L. (2015). Can universal screening increase the representation of low income and minority students in gifted education? (No. w21519). National Bureau of Economic Research.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2009). Gifted Learners: A Survey of Educational Policy and Provision. Odense/Denmark and Brussels/Belgium.
European Commission Eurydice (2006). Specific Educational Measures to Promote all Forms of Giftedness at School in Europe. Working Document, Brussels.
Gagné, F. (2011). Academic talent development and the equity issue in gifted education. Talent Development & Excellence, 3(1).
Gardner, H. (1984). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Goodnough, K. (2001). Changing teacher beliefs about giftedness and differentiation practices. Gifted and Talented International, 16(2), 115-121.
Hébert, T. H., & Reis, S. M. (1999). Culturally diverse high-achieving students in an urban high school. Urban Education, 34, 428-457.
Heuser B., Wang K., Shahid S. (υπό δημοσίευση). Global dimensions of gifted and talented education: The influence of national perceptions on policies and practices. Global Education Review.
Ibata-Arens, K. (2012). Race to the future: Innovations in gifted and enrichment education in Asia, and implications for the United States. Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 1–25.
Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102-116.
Lassig, C. (2009). Teachers' attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32.
Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 272-281.
Neihart, M., & Teo, C. T. (2013). Addressing the needs of the gifted in Singapore. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 290–306.
Petersen, J. (2013). Gender differences in identification of gifted youth and in gifted program participation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 342-348.
Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2008). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says. Prufrock Press.
Pomortseva, N. P., & Gabdrakhmanova, E. V. (2015). Gifted education in the Republic of Tatarstan: New challenges and innovative decisions. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(5), 218–224.
Reid, E., Boettger H. (2015). Gifted Education in Various Countries of Europe. Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal, 4(2): 158-171. DOI: 10.18355/PG.2015.4.2.158-171
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152-170.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and individual differences, 20(4), 308-317.
Renzulli, J. S., & Park, S. (2000). Gifted dropouts: The who and the why. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(4), 261-271.
Renzulli S. J and Reis, S. M., (2006). Culturally diverse students in Wallace B and Eriksson G (eds) Diversity in Gifted Education, International perspective on global issues. London and Νew York: Routledge.
Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. Handbook of gifted education, 3, 163-173.
Silverman, L. (2013). Why Does Denmark Need Gifted Education? Gifted Children‘s Symposioum. Danish Association for Gifted Children. Soro, Denmark. Available online: www.giftedchildren.dk/content.php?735-Linda-Silverman-Why-Does-Denmark-Need-Gifted-Education.
Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39-53.
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological science in the public interest, 12(1), 3-54.
Tirri, K., & Kuusisto, E. (2013). How Finland serves gifted and talented pupils. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 84–96.
Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., Harder, B. Balestrini, D.P. (2013). Gifted Education in German-Speaking Europe. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. Vol. 36. No. 3, pp. 384. ISSN 01623532.